Prashant A Karni, Himaja Kasarla, Annesha Koinyaki Konwar, Irfa Junaid, Manawar Ahmad Mansoor, Sumedh Lone, Pooja Kadam
{"title":"Assessment of Peri-Implant Tissue Health and Marginal Bone Loss in Immediate Versus Delayed Implant Placement.","authors":"Prashant A Karni, Himaja Kasarla, Annesha Koinyaki Konwar, Irfa Junaid, Manawar Ahmad Mansoor, Sumedh Lone, Pooja Kadam","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_306_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The ambition of this research is to gauge marginal bone loss (MBL) and peri-implant tissue health by comparing immediate and delayed implant implantation in a tertiary care setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects who had immediate and delayed implants were assessed. Clinical indicators such as bleeding on probing (BOP), peri-implant probing depth, and MBL were assessed at baseline and six months postimplantation. A result was considered statistically significant if it was <i>P</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>At first, there was no discernible variance between the demographic traits of the two groups. Regarding MBL and peri-implant probing depth, there were statistically significant (<i>P</i> < 0.05) deviations between groups at the six-month mark following implant installation. There were no appreciable variations in bleeding between the two groups, according to probing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In summary, compared to delayed implant placement, rapid implant placement was associated with MBL and increased peri-implant probing depth throughout a six-month follow-up period. These results emphasize the need for careful patient selection and treatment planning in implant dentistry.</p>","PeriodicalId":94339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","volume":"16 Suppl 3","pages":"S2582-S2584"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11426565/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_306_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The ambition of this research is to gauge marginal bone loss (MBL) and peri-implant tissue health by comparing immediate and delayed implant implantation in a tertiary care setting.
Methods: Subjects who had immediate and delayed implants were assessed. Clinical indicators such as bleeding on probing (BOP), peri-implant probing depth, and MBL were assessed at baseline and six months postimplantation. A result was considered statistically significant if it was P < 0.05.
Findings: At first, there was no discernible variance between the demographic traits of the two groups. Regarding MBL and peri-implant probing depth, there were statistically significant (P < 0.05) deviations between groups at the six-month mark following implant installation. There were no appreciable variations in bleeding between the two groups, according to probing.
Conclusion: In summary, compared to delayed implant placement, rapid implant placement was associated with MBL and increased peri-implant probing depth throughout a six-month follow-up period. These results emphasize the need for careful patient selection and treatment planning in implant dentistry.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
