Longitudinal Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Panoramic Radiography in Oral Pathology.

IF 0.7 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-31 DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_290_24
Suryakanta Nayak, Sanjay Sahoo, Mudita Chaturvedi, Aldrin Jerry, Ayoub R A Al-Ghaith, Surabhi S Ausare, Shivanand Bagewadi
{"title":"Longitudinal Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Panoramic Radiography in Oral Pathology.","authors":"Suryakanta Nayak, Sanjay Sahoo, Mudita Chaturvedi, Aldrin Jerry, Ayoub R A Al-Ghaith, Surabhi S Ausare, Shivanand Bagewadi","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_290_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this 5-year longitudinal study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography (PR) in identifying oral pathology at a tertiary care facility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patient files was done, encompassing those of patients who had PR for suspected oral lesions, followed by a biopsy. At various times, several diagnostic accuracy metrics were computed, such as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The research had 250 patients in total. In terms of identifying oral pathology, PR showed a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 90%. There were 80% and 92% PPV and NPV, respectively. With a computed DOR of 25, PR's total discriminating power was found to be high.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In summary, PR consistently demonstrates great diagnostic accuracy in identifying oral pathology at a tertiary care facility. These results confirm that PR is a useful screening technique for oral lesions in standard clinical practice. In order to overcome PR's shortcomings and investigate methods for enhancing its diagnostic effectiveness, more investigation is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":94339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","volume":"16 Suppl 3","pages":"S2378-S2380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11426881/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_290_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this 5-year longitudinal study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography (PR) in identifying oral pathology at a tertiary care facility.

Methods: A retrospective review of patient files was done, encompassing those of patients who had PR for suspected oral lesions, followed by a biopsy. At various times, several diagnostic accuracy metrics were computed, such as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR).

Results: The research had 250 patients in total. In terms of identifying oral pathology, PR showed a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 90%. There were 80% and 92% PPV and NPV, respectively. With a computed DOR of 25, PR's total discriminating power was found to be high.

Conclusion: In summary, PR consistently demonstrates great diagnostic accuracy in identifying oral pathology at a tertiary care facility. These results confirm that PR is a useful screening technique for oral lesions in standard clinical practice. In order to overcome PR's shortcomings and investigate methods for enhancing its diagnostic effectiveness, more investigation is necessary.

口腔病理学全景放射摄影诊断准确性的纵向分析。
目的这项为期 5 年的纵向研究旨在评估全景放射摄影术(PR)在确定一家三级医疗机构的口腔病变方面的诊断准确性:方法: 我们对患者档案进行了回顾性审查,其中包括因疑似口腔病变而接受全景放射摄影并随后进行活检的患者。在不同时期,计算了几种诊断准确性指标,如敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和诊断几率比(DOR):研究共有 250 名患者参与。在确定口腔病变方面,PR 的灵敏度为 85%,特异性为 90%。PPV和NPV分别为80%和92%。计算得出的 DOR 为 25,PR 的总鉴别力很高:总之,在一家三级医疗机构中,PR 在识别口腔病理学方面一直表现出很高的诊断准确性。这些结果证实,在标准临床实践中,PR 是一种有效的口腔病变筛查技术。为了克服 PR 的缺点并研究提高其诊断效果的方法,有必要进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信