Differences in total plaque burden between plaque rupture and plaque erosion: A combined computed tomography angiography and optical coherence tomography study
Takayuki Niida , Eisuke Usui , Keishi Suzuki , Daisuke Kinoshita , Haruhito Yuki , Daichi Fujimoto , Marco Covani , Damini Dey , Hang Lee , Iris McNulty , Maros Ferencik , Taishi Yonetsu , Tsunekazu Kakuta , Ik-Kyung Jang
{"title":"Differences in total plaque burden between plaque rupture and plaque erosion: A combined computed tomography angiography and optical coherence tomography study","authors":"Takayuki Niida , Eisuke Usui , Keishi Suzuki , Daisuke Kinoshita , Haruhito Yuki , Daichi Fujimoto , Marco Covani , Damini Dey , Hang Lee , Iris McNulty , Maros Ferencik , Taishi Yonetsu , Tsunekazu Kakuta , Ik-Kyung Jang","doi":"10.1016/j.jcct.2024.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Backgrounds</h3><div>Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) allows for the assessment of atherosclerotic plaque burden across the entire coronary vasculature. No studies have examined the relationship between the underlying pathology of the culprit lesion and total plaque burden in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The aim of this study was to compare the total plaque burden between patients with plaque rupture versus plaque erosion.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 232 patients who presented with their first non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome and underwent both CTA and optical coherence tomography imaging before intervention were selected. Quantitative analysis was performed using semi-automated software (Autoplaque version 3.0, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center). An attenuation of <30 Hounsfield units defined low-density non-calcified plaque (LDNCP). All 3 vessels were assessed using the modified 17-segment American Heart Association model for coronary segment classification.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 232 patients, 125 (53.9%) had plaque rupture and 107 (46.1%) had plaque erosion. Total plaque burden (48.2 [39.8–54.9] % vs. 44.1 [38.6–50.0] %, P = 0.006), total non-calcified plaque (NCP) burden (46.6 [39.1–53.3] % vs. 43.0 [37.6–49.2] %, P = 0.013), total LDNCP burden (2.3 [1.4–3.0] % vs. 1.7 [1.2–2.6] %, P = 0.016), and total calcified plaque (CP) burden (0.8 [0.1–1.6] % vs. 0.4 [0.0–1.4] %, P = 0.047) were significantly greater in patients with culprit plaque rupture than in those with culprit plaque erosion.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients with plaque rupture, compared with those with plaque erosion, had a greater total plaque burden, NCP burden, LDNCP burden, and CP burden.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration</h3><div>URL: <span><span>https://www.clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>; Unique identifier: NCT04523194.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49039,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography","volume":"18 6","pages":"Pages 568-574"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1934592524004416","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Backgrounds
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) allows for the assessment of atherosclerotic plaque burden across the entire coronary vasculature. No studies have examined the relationship between the underlying pathology of the culprit lesion and total plaque burden in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The aim of this study was to compare the total plaque burden between patients with plaque rupture versus plaque erosion.
Methods
A total of 232 patients who presented with their first non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome and underwent both CTA and optical coherence tomography imaging before intervention were selected. Quantitative analysis was performed using semi-automated software (Autoplaque version 3.0, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center). An attenuation of <30 Hounsfield units defined low-density non-calcified plaque (LDNCP). All 3 vessels were assessed using the modified 17-segment American Heart Association model for coronary segment classification.
Results
Among 232 patients, 125 (53.9%) had plaque rupture and 107 (46.1%) had plaque erosion. Total plaque burden (48.2 [39.8–54.9] % vs. 44.1 [38.6–50.0] %, P = 0.006), total non-calcified plaque (NCP) burden (46.6 [39.1–53.3] % vs. 43.0 [37.6–49.2] %, P = 0.013), total LDNCP burden (2.3 [1.4–3.0] % vs. 1.7 [1.2–2.6] %, P = 0.016), and total calcified plaque (CP) burden (0.8 [0.1–1.6] % vs. 0.4 [0.0–1.4] %, P = 0.047) were significantly greater in patients with culprit plaque rupture than in those with culprit plaque erosion.
Conclusion
Patients with plaque rupture, compared with those with plaque erosion, had a greater total plaque burden, NCP burden, LDNCP burden, and CP burden.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography is a unique peer-review journal that integrates the entire international cardiovascular CT community including cardiologist and radiologists, from basic to clinical academic researchers, to private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our cardiovascular imaging community across the world. The goal of the journal is to advance the field of cardiovascular CT as the leading cardiovascular CT journal, attracting seminal work in the field with rapid and timely dissemination in electronic and print media.