Clinical effect of rehabilitation after distal radius fracture surgery using a wearable device: A comparative prospective cohort study.

Hand surgery & rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-28 DOI:10.1016/j.hansur.2024.101779
SeongJu Choi, Joonha Lee, Kee Jeong Bae, Dong Kyun Kim, Young Ho Lee, Yohan Lee
{"title":"Clinical effect of rehabilitation after distal radius fracture surgery using a wearable device: A comparative prospective cohort study.","authors":"SeongJu Choi, Joonha Lee, Kee Jeong Bae, Dong Kyun Kim, Young Ho Lee, Yohan Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.hansur.2024.101779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Appropriate postoperative rehabilitation of distal radius fractures is essential for early recovery and pain management, but may be limited by medical staff and equipment availability and costs. Home-based training or wearable devices provide an alternative.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess use of a wearable device and home-based training for rehabilitation after distal radius fracture surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective comparative cohort study.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Between April and November 2021, patients aged > 20 years with distal radius fracture who could understand and use wearable devices and their application were recruited. Patients with polytrauma, neurological disorder or musculoskeletal disorder were excluded. The control group underwent a regimen of passive and active finger and wrist exercises after surgery, while the experimental group performed equivalent rehabilitation using a wearable device (smart glove). Outcomes comprised pain on visual analog scale, wrist range of motion, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, Modified Mayo Wrist Score, and radiographic parameters (radial inclination, radial height, ulnar variance and volar tilt) at 6 and 12 weeks after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fracture type, age and gender did not differ between the control (n = 7) and experimental (n = 7) groups. All participants achieved bone union and exhibited equivalent radiographic parameters at follow-up. The experimental group showed significantly improved Mayo scores (65.7 vs. 56.4, p = 0.044), wrist range of motion (259.3 vs. 179.3, p = 0.021), and pain (1.43 vs. 3.29, p = 0.011) at 6 but not 12 weeks' follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rehabilitation using a smart glove showed better short-term clinical outcomes after surgery than conventional rehabilitation. Rehabilitation using a wearable device may be beneficial for early recovery after distal radius fracture surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":94023,"journal":{"name":"Hand surgery & rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"101779"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand surgery & rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2024.101779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Appropriate postoperative rehabilitation of distal radius fractures is essential for early recovery and pain management, but may be limited by medical staff and equipment availability and costs. Home-based training or wearable devices provide an alternative.

Objectives: To assess use of a wearable device and home-based training for rehabilitation after distal radius fracture surgery.

Design: Prospective comparative cohort study.

Method: Between April and November 2021, patients aged > 20 years with distal radius fracture who could understand and use wearable devices and their application were recruited. Patients with polytrauma, neurological disorder or musculoskeletal disorder were excluded. The control group underwent a regimen of passive and active finger and wrist exercises after surgery, while the experimental group performed equivalent rehabilitation using a wearable device (smart glove). Outcomes comprised pain on visual analog scale, wrist range of motion, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, Modified Mayo Wrist Score, and radiographic parameters (radial inclination, radial height, ulnar variance and volar tilt) at 6 and 12 weeks after surgery.

Results: Fracture type, age and gender did not differ between the control (n = 7) and experimental (n = 7) groups. All participants achieved bone union and exhibited equivalent radiographic parameters at follow-up. The experimental group showed significantly improved Mayo scores (65.7 vs. 56.4, p = 0.044), wrist range of motion (259.3 vs. 179.3, p = 0.021), and pain (1.43 vs. 3.29, p = 0.011) at 6 but not 12 weeks' follow-up.

Conclusions: Rehabilitation using a smart glove showed better short-term clinical outcomes after surgery than conventional rehabilitation. Rehabilitation using a wearable device may be beneficial for early recovery after distal radius fracture surgery.

使用可穿戴设备进行桡骨远端骨折术后康复的临床效果:前瞻性队列比较研究
背景:桡骨远端骨折术后适当的康复治疗对早期恢复和疼痛控制至关重要,但可能会受到医务人员、设备可用性和成本的限制。家庭训练或可穿戴设备提供了另一种选择:评估桡骨远端骨折术后使用可穿戴设备和家庭训练进行康复的情况:设计:前瞻性队列比较研究:方法:2021 年 4 月至 11 月间,招募年龄大于 20 岁、能够理解和使用可穿戴设备及其应用的桡骨远端骨折患者。排除多发性创伤、神经系统疾病或肌肉骨骼疾病患者。对照组在术后进行手指和手腕的被动和主动锻炼,而实验组则使用可穿戴设备(智能手套)进行同等的康复训练。结果包括术后6周和12周的疼痛视觉模拟量表、腕关节活动范围、手臂、肩部和手部快速残疾评分、改良梅奥腕关节评分以及放射学参数(桡侧倾斜、桡侧高度、尺侧偏差和外侧倾斜):对照组(7 人)和实验组(7 人)的骨折类型、年龄和性别没有差异。所有参与者都实现了骨结合,并在随访时显示出相同的放射学参数。实验组的梅奥评分(65.7 vs. 56.4,p = 0.044)、腕关节活动范围(259.3 vs. 179.3,p = 0.021)和疼痛(1.43 vs. 3.29,p = 0.011)在随访 6 周(而非 12 周)时均有明显改善:结论:与传统康复训练相比,使用智能手套进行术后康复训练可获得更好的短期临床效果。使用可穿戴设备进行康复治疗可能有利于桡骨远端骨折术后的早期恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信