Sex and gender specific pitfalls and challenges in cardiac rehabilitation: a working hypothesis towards better inclusivity in cardiac rehabilitation programmes.

European heart journal open Pub Date : 2024-09-06 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjopen/oeae071
Alberto M Marra, Federica Giardino, Andrea Salzano, Roberto Caruso, Vito Maurizio Parato, Giuseppe Diaferia, Leopoldo Pagliani, Bruna Miserrafiti, Michele Gabriele, Mario Mallardo, Giuseppe Bifulco, Angela Zampella, Anna Franzone, Giovanni Esposito, Eduardo Bossone, Valeria Raparelli, Antonio Cittadini
{"title":"Sex and gender specific pitfalls and challenges in cardiac rehabilitation: a working hypothesis towards better inclusivity in cardiac rehabilitation programmes.","authors":"Alberto M Marra, Federica Giardino, Andrea Salzano, Roberto Caruso, Vito Maurizio Parato, Giuseppe Diaferia, Leopoldo Pagliani, Bruna Miserrafiti, Michele Gabriele, Mario Mallardo, Giuseppe Bifulco, Angela Zampella, Anna Franzone, Giovanni Esposito, Eduardo Bossone, Valeria Raparelli, Antonio Cittadini","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeae071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Notwithstanding its acknowledged pivotal role for cardiovascular prevention, cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is still largely under prescribed, in almost 25% of patients owing an indication for. In addition, when considering differences concerning the two sexes, female individuals are underrepresented in CR programmes with lower referral rates, participation, and completion as compared to male counterpart. This picture becomes even more tangled with reference to gender, a complex socio-cultural construct characterized by four domains (gender identity, relation, role, and institutionalized gender). Indeed, each of them reveals several obstacles that considerably penalize CR adherence for different categories of people, especially those who are not identifiable with a non-binary gender. Aim of the present review is to identify the sex- (i.e. biological) and gender- (i.e. socio-cultural) specific obstacles to CR related to biological sex and sociocultural gender and then envision a likely viable solution through tailored treatments towards patients' well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"4 5","pages":"oeae071"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11430269/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeae071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Notwithstanding its acknowledged pivotal role for cardiovascular prevention, cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is still largely under prescribed, in almost 25% of patients owing an indication for. In addition, when considering differences concerning the two sexes, female individuals are underrepresented in CR programmes with lower referral rates, participation, and completion as compared to male counterpart. This picture becomes even more tangled with reference to gender, a complex socio-cultural construct characterized by four domains (gender identity, relation, role, and institutionalized gender). Indeed, each of them reveals several obstacles that considerably penalize CR adherence for different categories of people, especially those who are not identifiable with a non-binary gender. Aim of the present review is to identify the sex- (i.e. biological) and gender- (i.e. socio-cultural) specific obstacles to CR related to biological sex and sociocultural gender and then envision a likely viable solution through tailored treatments towards patients' well-being.

心脏康复中与性别相关的陷阱和挑战:为实现心脏康复计划更好的包容性而提出的工作假设。
尽管心脏康复(CR)在预防心血管疾病方面发挥着举足轻重的作用,但它在很大程度上仍未得到充分应用。此外,考虑到两性之间的差异,女性在心脏康复计划中的代表性不足,转诊率、参与率和完成率均低于男性。性别是一个复杂的社会文化概念,其特征包括四个方面(性别认同、关系、角色和制度化的性别)。事实上,每一个领域都揭示了一些障碍,这些障碍极大地影响了不同类别的人,尤其是那些无法识别为非二元性别的人遵守 CR 的情况。本综述旨在找出与生理性别和社会文化性别有关的、妨碍坚持 CR 的特定性别(即生理性别)和性别(即社会文化性别)障碍,然后通过量身定制的治疗方法,为患者的福祉设想可行的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信