Describing resident physician productivity in a Canadian academic emergency department.

IF 2.4
CJEM Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1007/s43678-024-00781-6
Julien Turk, Scott Odorizzi, Sebastian Dewhirst, Jessica Maher, Jeffrey M Landreville
{"title":"Describing resident physician productivity in a Canadian academic emergency department.","authors":"Julien Turk, Scott Odorizzi, Sebastian Dewhirst, Jessica Maher, Jeffrey M Landreville","doi":"10.1007/s43678-024-00781-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This cohort study aimed to investigate resident physician productivity in an academic emergency department (ED) and assess the impact of longitudinal coaching relationships known as clinical coaching teams and co-learners (medical students) on resident productivity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from patient visits to two academic EDs in Ottawa, Canada between April 2022 and March 2023 were analyzed. The attending physician schedule, learner arrangements, and patient ED treatment team information were collected. The presence or absence of clinical coaching teams was also recorded. Mean productivity, measured as patients per hour, was calculated for different shifts and learner arrangements. Linear regression and paired t tests were performed for analysis across ambulatory and non-ambulatory settings, with a focus on productivity differences across residents' training programs and level of training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 142,386 ED visits were included in the analysis across 8161 attending physician shifts. Resident productivity increased with each year of training, with Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada emergency medicine residents being the most productive by year 5. There was no significant difference in productivity between residents on clinical coaching team shifts compared to non-clinical coaching team shifts. Productivity decreased slightly when residents worked with medical students as co-learners. There was no significant relationship between the difference in productivity on shifts with and without a medical student and year of training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study is the first of its kind to describe resident physician productivity in a Canadian emergency department. The results of this study demonstrate that resident physician productivity improves with seniority, and that co-learners and clinical coaching teams do not significantly impact productivity. This information will be useful to program directors and residents to help set realistic expectations around productivity and to ED physician leads in planning service delivery for patients in the context of a training program.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00781-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This cohort study aimed to investigate resident physician productivity in an academic emergency department (ED) and assess the impact of longitudinal coaching relationships known as clinical coaching teams and co-learners (medical students) on resident productivity.

Methods: Data from patient visits to two academic EDs in Ottawa, Canada between April 2022 and March 2023 were analyzed. The attending physician schedule, learner arrangements, and patient ED treatment team information were collected. The presence or absence of clinical coaching teams was also recorded. Mean productivity, measured as patients per hour, was calculated for different shifts and learner arrangements. Linear regression and paired t tests were performed for analysis across ambulatory and non-ambulatory settings, with a focus on productivity differences across residents' training programs and level of training.

Results: A total of 142,386 ED visits were included in the analysis across 8161 attending physician shifts. Resident productivity increased with each year of training, with Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada emergency medicine residents being the most productive by year 5. There was no significant difference in productivity between residents on clinical coaching team shifts compared to non-clinical coaching team shifts. Productivity decreased slightly when residents worked with medical students as co-learners. There was no significant relationship between the difference in productivity on shifts with and without a medical student and year of training.

Conclusions: This study is the first of its kind to describe resident physician productivity in a Canadian emergency department. The results of this study demonstrate that resident physician productivity improves with seniority, and that co-learners and clinical coaching teams do not significantly impact productivity. This information will be useful to program directors and residents to help set realistic expectations around productivity and to ED physician leads in planning service delivery for patients in the context of a training program.

描述加拿大学术急诊科住院医生的工作效率。
目的:这项队列研究旨在调查学术急诊科(ED)住院医师的工作效率,并评估被称为临床指导团队和共同学习者(医学生)的纵向指导关系对住院医师工作效率的影响:分析了 2022 年 4 月至 2023 年 3 月期间加拿大渥太华两家学术性急诊科的患者就诊数据。收集了主治医生的日程安排、学习者的安排以及患者急诊室治疗团队的信息。此外,还记录了临床指导团队的存在与否。计算了不同班次和学习者安排下的平均生产率(以每小时病人数计算)。对门诊和非门诊环境进行线性回归和配对 t 检验分析,重点关注住院医师培训项目和培训水平之间的生产率差异:在 8161 个主治医生班次中,共有 142386 次急诊就诊被纳入分析范围。住院医师的工作效率随着培训年限的增加而提高,加拿大皇家内外科医生学院急诊科住院医师的工作效率在第 5 年时最高。与非临床指导小组轮班的住院医师相比,临床指导小组轮班的住院医师在工作效率上没有明显差异。当住院医师与医科学生共同学习时,工作效率略有下降。有医科学生和无医科学生轮班时的工作效率差异与培训年限无明显关系:这项研究是首次对加拿大急诊科住院医生的工作效率进行描述。研究结果表明,住院医师的工作效率随着年资的增加而提高,共同学习者和临床指导团队对工作效率的影响不大。这些信息对项目主任和住院医师很有帮助,有助于他们围绕工作效率设定切合实际的期望值,并帮助住院医师在培训项目中规划为患者提供的服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信