Strategic Ethics: Physician Associations and Their Roles in Pursuing Racial Equity.

IF 2.3 3区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Sorcha A Brophy, Roma Shah
{"title":"Strategic Ethics: Physician Associations and Their Roles in Pursuing Racial Equity.","authors":"Sorcha A Brophy, Roma Shah","doi":"10.1002/hast.4912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since 2020, physician associations have become more vocal about confronting racism, initiating a wide range of advocacy efforts, making programming changes, and issuing public statements on the topic. However, associations have directed their enthusiasm about addressing racism toward an overly broad range of statements, initiatives, and legislative advocacy. In this essay, we provide some guidance regarding which race-based actions are best suited for physicians' professional associations. We describe traits of three types of physician associations in the United States-state, specialty, and affinity-highlighting characteristics of each and discussing their strengths and weaknesses regarding different types of action around racism. It is our hope that we might direct concerned physicians toward initiatives that draw upon association strengths and that can serve as the basis for association-specific advocacy niches-and away from initiatives that enable associations to signal that they are engaged in racial-equity work without accountability or efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":55073,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Center Report","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hastings Center Report","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.4912","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since 2020, physician associations have become more vocal about confronting racism, initiating a wide range of advocacy efforts, making programming changes, and issuing public statements on the topic. However, associations have directed their enthusiasm about addressing racism toward an overly broad range of statements, initiatives, and legislative advocacy. In this essay, we provide some guidance regarding which race-based actions are best suited for physicians' professional associations. We describe traits of three types of physician associations in the United States-state, specialty, and affinity-highlighting characteristics of each and discussing their strengths and weaknesses regarding different types of action around racism. It is our hope that we might direct concerned physicians toward initiatives that draw upon association strengths and that can serve as the basis for association-specific advocacy niches-and away from initiatives that enable associations to signal that they are engaged in racial-equity work without accountability or efficacy.

战略伦理:医生协会及其在追求种族平等中的作用。
自 2020 年以来,医生协会在对抗种族主义方面的声音越来越大,发起了广泛的宣传活动,对计划进行了调整,并就这一主题发表了公开声明。然而,各协会将应对种族主义的热情导向了过于广泛的声明、倡议和立法倡导。在本文中,我们将就哪些基于种族的行动最适合医生专业协会提供一些指导。我们描述了美国三类医生协会的特征--州立、专业和亲和--强调了每一类协会的特点,并讨论了它们在围绕种族主义采取不同类型行动方面的优缺点。我们希望,我们可以引导相关医生采取利用协会优势的措施,这些措施可以作为协会特定宣传领域的基础,而不是让协会发出信号,表明他们正在参与种族平等工作,但却不负责任或没有成效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hastings Center Report
Hastings Center Report 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hastings Center Report explores ethical, legal, and social issues in medicine, health care, public health, and the life sciences. Six issues per year offer articles, essays, case studies of bioethical problems, columns on law and policy, caregivers’ stories, peer-reviewed scholarly articles, and book reviews. Authors come from an assortment of professions and academic disciplines and express a range of perspectives and political opinions. The Report’s readership includes physicians, nurses, scholars, administrators, social workers, health lawyers, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信