CDC Program Evaluation Framework, 2024.

IF 33.7 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Daniel P Kidder, Leslie A Fierro, Elena Luna, Heather Salvaggio, Amanda McWhorter, Shelly-Ann Bowen, Rebecca Murphy-Hoefer, Sally Thigpen, Dayna Alexander, Theresa L Armstead, Euna August, Destiny Bruce, Seseni Nu Clarke, Cassandra Davis, Amia Downes, Sarah Gill, L Duane House, Michael Kerzner, Karen Kun, Karen Mumford, Leah Robin, Dara Schlueter, Michael Schooley, Eduardo Valverde, Linda Vo, Donjanea Williams, Kai Young
{"title":"CDC Program Evaluation Framework, 2024.","authors":"Daniel P Kidder, Leslie A Fierro, Elena Luna, Heather Salvaggio, Amanda McWhorter, Shelly-Ann Bowen, Rebecca Murphy-Hoefer, Sally Thigpen, Dayna Alexander, Theresa L Armstead, Euna August, Destiny Bruce, Seseni Nu Clarke, Cassandra Davis, Amia Downes, Sarah Gill, L Duane House, Michael Kerzner, Karen Kun, Karen Mumford, Leah Robin, Dara Schlueter, Michael Schooley, Eduardo Valverde, Linda Vo, Donjanea Williams, Kai Young","doi":"10.15585/mmwr.rr7306a1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Program evaluation is a critical tool for understanding and improving organizational activities and systems. This report updates the 1999 CDC Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health (CDC. Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR Recomm Rep 1999;48[No. RR-11];1-40) by integrating major advancements in the fields of evaluation and public health, lessons learned from practical applications of the original framework, and current Federal agency policies and practices. A practical, nonprescriptive tool, the updated 2024 framework is designed to summarize and organize essential elements of program evaluation, and can be applied at any level from individual programs to broader systems by novices and experts for planning and implementing an evaluation. Although many of the key aspects from the 1999 framework remain, certain key differences exist. For example, this updated framework also includes six steps that describe the general process of evaluation planning and implementation, but some content and step names have changed (e.g., the first step has been renamed Assess context). The standards for high-quality evaluation remain central to the framework, although they have been updated to the five Federal evaluation standards. The most substantial change from the 1999 framework is the addition of three cross-cutting actions that are core tenets to incorporate within each evaluation step: engage collaboratively, advance equity, and learn from and use insights. The 2024 framework provides a guide for designing and conducting evaluation across many topics within and outside of public health that anyone involved in program evaluation efforts can use alone or in conjunction with other evaluation approaches, tools, or methods to build evidence, understand programs, and refine evidence-based decision-making to improve all program outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51328,"journal":{"name":"Mmwr Recommendations and Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":33.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11444645/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mmwr Recommendations and Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.rr7306a1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Program evaluation is a critical tool for understanding and improving organizational activities and systems. This report updates the 1999 CDC Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health (CDC. Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR Recomm Rep 1999;48[No. RR-11];1-40) by integrating major advancements in the fields of evaluation and public health, lessons learned from practical applications of the original framework, and current Federal agency policies and practices. A practical, nonprescriptive tool, the updated 2024 framework is designed to summarize and organize essential elements of program evaluation, and can be applied at any level from individual programs to broader systems by novices and experts for planning and implementing an evaluation. Although many of the key aspects from the 1999 framework remain, certain key differences exist. For example, this updated framework also includes six steps that describe the general process of evaluation planning and implementation, but some content and step names have changed (e.g., the first step has been renamed Assess context). The standards for high-quality evaluation remain central to the framework, although they have been updated to the five Federal evaluation standards. The most substantial change from the 1999 framework is the addition of three cross-cutting actions that are core tenets to incorporate within each evaluation step: engage collaboratively, advance equity, and learn from and use insights. The 2024 framework provides a guide for designing and conducting evaluation across many topics within and outside of public health that anyone involved in program evaluation efforts can use alone or in conjunction with other evaluation approaches, tools, or methods to build evidence, understand programs, and refine evidence-based decision-making to improve all program outcomes.

疾病预防控制中心计划评估框架,2024 年。
项目评估是了解和改进组织活动和系统的重要工具。本报告更新了 1999 年疾病预防控制中心的公共卫生项目评估框架(CDC.公共卫生项目评估框架。MMWR Recomm Rep 1999;48[No.RR-11];1-40),整合了评估和公共卫生领域的主要进展、从原始框架的实际应用中吸取的经验教训以及当前联邦机构的政策和实践。作为一个实用的、非指令性的工具,更新后的 2024 框架旨在总结和组织项目评估的基本要素,可被新手和专家应用于从单个项目到更广泛系统的任何层面,以规划和实施评估。尽管仍保留了 1999 年框架中的许多关键内容,但仍存在某些关键差异。例如,更新后的框架还包括描述评估规划和实施的一般过程的六个步骤,但一些内容和步骤名称有所改变(例如,第一步被重新命名为评估背景)。高质量评估的标准仍然是该框架的核心,但已更新为五项联邦评估标准。与 1999 年的框架相比,最实质性的变化是增加了三个贯穿各领域的行动,这三个行 动是纳入每个评估步骤的核心原则:合作参与、促进公平以及学习和利用洞察力。2024 年框架为设计和开展公共卫生内外许多主题的评估提供了指南,任何参与计划评估工作的人都可以单独使用或与其他评估方法、工具或方法结合使用,以建立证据、了解计划并完善基于证据的决策,从而改善所有计划成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mmwr Recommendations and Reports
Mmwr Recommendations and Reports PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
36.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: The MMWR series of publications is published by the Office of Science, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), U.S. The MMWR Recommendations and Reports contain in-depth articles that relay policy statements for prevention and treatment in all areas in the CDC’s scope of responsibility (e.g., recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信