Evaluating vertebrobasilar insufficiency and Meniere's disease: Insights from cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential and video head impulse test.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mehmet Surmeli, Reyhan Surmeli, Destina Yalcin, Ayse Asli Yilmaz Sahin, Ahmet Cirik Adnan, Gozde Gunay, Fatma Kulali
{"title":"Evaluating vertebrobasilar insufficiency and Meniere's disease: Insights from cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential and video head impulse test.","authors":"Mehmet Surmeli, Reyhan Surmeli, Destina Yalcin, Ayse Asli Yilmaz Sahin, Ahmet Cirik Adnan, Gozde Gunay, Fatma Kulali","doi":"10.18071/isz.77.0349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong><p>This prospective study aimed to investigate diffe-rences in video head impulse test (vHIT) and&nbsp;cervical vestibular evoked myogenic poten-tial (cVEMP) findings between patients with vertebrobasilar insufficiency (VBI) and Meniere&rsquo;s disease (MD) who experience episodic vertigo attacks.</p>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong><p>A total of 27 patients with VBI and 37 patients with MD were enrolled into the study in a tertiary referral center. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients with a minimum of two previous vertigo attacks, unaccompanied by any neurological symptoms during an attack. All patients underwent horizontal canal h-vHIT and c-VEMP assessments following pure sound audiometric examinations. First, vHIT and cVEMP results for low and high flow sides in VBI patients were analyzed. Subsequently, data from the low-flow side in VBI patients and the affected side in MD patients were compared.</p>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><p>The mean vHIT values for low and high-flow volume sides in VBI patients were 0.68 and 0.88, respectively. In MD patients, mean vHIT values for affected and healthy sides were measured as 0.77 and 0.87, respectively. Abnormal results were observed in 66.7% of VBI patients and 51.4% of MD patients, with no statistically significant difference between the findings (p&gt; 0.05). Upon examining the affected side, c-VEMP responses were absent in 41% of MD patients and 48% of VBI patients, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (p&gt; 0.05).</p>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><p>vHIT and cVEMP assessments can be utilized as supplementary tools to radiologic investigations for the clinical diagnosis and follow-up of VBI. However, no significant differences were observed between vHIT and cVEMP findings in patients with MD and VBI.</p>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50394,"journal":{"name":"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"77 9-10","pages":"349-356"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18071/isz.77.0349","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose:

This prospective study aimed to investigate diffe-rences in video head impulse test (vHIT) and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic poten-tial (cVEMP) findings between patients with vertebrobasilar insufficiency (VBI) and Meniere’s disease (MD) who experience episodic vertigo attacks.

.

Methods:

A total of 27 patients with VBI and 37 patients with MD were enrolled into the study in a tertiary referral center. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients with a minimum of two previous vertigo attacks, unaccompanied by any neurological symptoms during an attack. All patients underwent horizontal canal h-vHIT and c-VEMP assessments following pure sound audiometric examinations. First, vHIT and cVEMP results for low and high flow sides in VBI patients were analyzed. Subsequently, data from the low-flow side in VBI patients and the affected side in MD patients were compared.

.

Results:

The mean vHIT values for low and high-flow volume sides in VBI patients were 0.68 and 0.88, respectively. In MD patients, mean vHIT values for affected and healthy sides were measured as 0.77 and 0.87, respectively. Abnormal results were observed in 66.7% of VBI patients and 51.4% of MD patients, with no statistically significant difference between the findings (p> 0.05). Upon examining the affected side, c-VEMP responses were absent in 41% of MD patients and 48% of VBI patients, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (p> 0.05).

.

Conclusion:

vHIT and cVEMP assessments can be utilized as supplementary tools to radiologic investigations for the clinical diagnosis and follow-up of VBI. However, no significant differences were observed between vHIT and cVEMP findings in patients with MD and VBI.

.

评估椎基底动脉供血不足和梅尼埃病:颈前庭诱发肌源性电位和视频头脉冲试验的启示。
背景和目的:这项前瞻性研究旨在探讨发作性眩晕的椎基底动脉供血不足(VBI)和梅尼埃病(MD)患者的视频头脉冲试验(vHIT)和颈前庭诱发肌源性电位(cVEMP)结果的差异:一家三级转诊中心共招募了 27 名 VBI 患者和 37 名 MD 患者参与研究。纳入标准包括既往至少有两次眩晕发作,且在发作期间未伴有任何神经症状的患者。所有患者在接受纯音测听检查后都接受了水平管 h-vHIT 和 c-VEMP 评估。首先,分析了 VBI 患者低流量侧和高流量侧的 vHIT 和 cVEMP 结果。随后,比较了 VBI 患者低流量侧和 MD 患者受影响侧的数据:VBI患者低流量侧和高流量侧的平均vHIT值分别为0.68和0.88。在 MD 患者中,患侧和健侧的平均 vHIT 值分别为 0.77 和 0.87。在 66.7% 的 VBI 患者和 51.4% 的 MD 患者中观察到了异常结果,两者之间的差异无统计学意义(p> 0.05)。在检查患侧时,41% 的 MD 患者和 48% 的 VBI 患者没有 c-VEMP 反应,组间差异无统计学意义(p> 0.05)。然而,在 MD 和 VBI 患者中,vHIT 和 cVEMP 结果之间并无明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience
Ideggyogyaszati Szemle-Clinical Neuroscience CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Clinical Neuroscience (Ideggyógyászati Szemle) is to provide a forum for the exchange of clinical and scientific information for a multidisciplinary community. The Clinical Neuroscience will be of primary interest to neurologists, neurosurgeons, psychiatrist and clinical specialized psycholigists, neuroradiologists and clinical neurophysiologists, but original works in basic or computer science, epidemiology, pharmacology, etc., relating to the clinical practice with involvement of the central nervous system are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信