[Rehabilitative subacute inpatient care-Optimizing posthospital care for geriatric patients with rehabilitation needs: results of the REKUP study].

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Anne Keilhauer, Christian Werner, Sandra Diekmann, Pauline Zur Nieden, Kathrin Pahmeier, Anja Neumann, Anke Walendzik, Theresa Hüer, Pascal Raszke, Jürgen Wasem, Julia Frankenhauser-Mannuß, Norbert Specht-Leible, Jürgen M Bauer
{"title":"[Rehabilitative subacute inpatient care-Optimizing posthospital care for geriatric patients with rehabilitation needs: results of the REKUP study].","authors":"Anne Keilhauer, Christian Werner, Sandra Diekmann, Pauline Zur Nieden, Kathrin Pahmeier, Anja Neumann, Anke Walendzik, Theresa Hüer, Pascal Raszke, Jürgen Wasem, Julia Frankenhauser-Mannuß, Norbert Specht-Leible, Jürgen M Bauer","doi":"10.1007/s00391-024-02367-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Geriatric patients in subacute inpatient care (SC) with rehabilitation needs after hospitalization seldom utilize rehabilitative services and are often transitioned to long-term care (LTC), suggesting that their care in SC can be optimized.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of rehabilitative subacute inpatient care (REKUP) in improving the care of geriatric patients in SC with rehabilitation needs after hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted as a nonrandomized intervention trial with an historical control group (CG). The intervention group (IG: n = 49) received REKUP (activating therapeutic care, functional rehabilitative therapy, psychosocial services, medical care), while the CG (n = 57) received usual care during SC. Primary outcomes were transition to inpatient rehabilitation, home, and LTC, deteriorated care setting, care level, and mortality within 3 months after SC. Secondary outcomes were functional, motor and psychological variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The transition rate to inpatient rehabilitation (82% vs. 37%) and home (86% vs. 65%) was higher (p < 0.05) in the IG than in the CG. The proportion of persons utilizing LTC (12% vs. 35%) and with deteriorated care setting (35% vs. 60%) was lower (p < 0.01) in the IG than in the CG. The Barthel Index, visual analogue scale of the EQ-5D, and numerical pain scale improved (p < 0.05) during the SC stay in the IG but not in the CG.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>REKUP as a new care model for SC promotes the transition to inpatient rehabilitation, reduces the utilization of LTC and improves the chances of returning home and achieving greater independence in geriatric patients with rehabilitation needs after hospitalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":49345,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-024-02367-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Geriatric patients in subacute inpatient care (SC) with rehabilitation needs after hospitalization seldom utilize rehabilitative services and are often transitioned to long-term care (LTC), suggesting that their care in SC can be optimized.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of rehabilitative subacute inpatient care (REKUP) in improving the care of geriatric patients in SC with rehabilitation needs after hospitalization.

Methods: The study was conducted as a nonrandomized intervention trial with an historical control group (CG). The intervention group (IG: n = 49) received REKUP (activating therapeutic care, functional rehabilitative therapy, psychosocial services, medical care), while the CG (n = 57) received usual care during SC. Primary outcomes were transition to inpatient rehabilitation, home, and LTC, deteriorated care setting, care level, and mortality within 3 months after SC. Secondary outcomes were functional, motor and psychological variables.

Results: The transition rate to inpatient rehabilitation (82% vs. 37%) and home (86% vs. 65%) was higher (p < 0.05) in the IG than in the CG. The proportion of persons utilizing LTC (12% vs. 35%) and with deteriorated care setting (35% vs. 60%) was lower (p < 0.01) in the IG than in the CG. The Barthel Index, visual analogue scale of the EQ-5D, and numerical pain scale improved (p < 0.05) during the SC stay in the IG but not in the CG.

Discussion: REKUP as a new care model for SC promotes the transition to inpatient rehabilitation, reduces the utilization of LTC and improves the chances of returning home and achieving greater independence in geriatric patients with rehabilitation needs after hospitalization.

[康复亚急性住院护理--优化有康复需求的老年病人的院后护理:REKUP 研究结果]。
背景:住院后有康复需求的亚急性住院病人(SC)中的老年病人很少使用康复服务,通常会被转入长期护理(LTC),这表明他们在亚急性住院病人中的护理可以得到优化:评估亚急性住院康复护理(REKUP)在改善住院后有康复需求的亚急性住院老年病人护理方面的效果:研究以非随机干预试验的形式进行,并设历史对照组(CG)。干预组(IG:n = 49)接受 REKUP(激活治疗护理、功能康复治疗、社会心理服务、医疗护理),而历史对照组(CG:n = 57)在住院期间接受常规护理。主要结果是 SC 后 3 个月内转入住院康复、家庭和 LTC、护理环境恶化、护理级别和死亡率。次要结果为功能、运动和心理变量:向住院康复(82% 对 37%)和居家(86% 对 65%)的过渡率更高(P 讨论):REKUP作为一种新的住院康复护理模式,促进了住院康复的过渡,减少了对长期护理服务的使用,提高了有康复需求的老年病人住院后重返家庭并实现更大程度独立的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
126
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The fact that more and more people are becoming older and are having a significant influence on our society is due to intensive geriatric research and geriatric medicine in the past and present. The Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie has contributed to this area for many years by informing a broad spectrum of interested readers about various developments in gerontology research. Special issues focus on all questions concerning gerontology, biology and basic research of aging, geriatric research, psychology and sociology as well as practical aspects of geriatric care. Target group: Geriatricians, social gerontologists, geriatric psychologists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurses/caregivers, nurse researchers, biogerontologists in geriatric wards/clinics, gerontological institutes, and institutions of teaching and further or continuing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信