Development and validation of the Nursing Information Security Questionnaire.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Xiaoyun Zhou, Tingting Gao, Xiujuan Jing, Hong Liu, Xuebing Jing
{"title":"Development and validation of the Nursing Information Security Questionnaire.","authors":"Xiaoyun Zhou, Tingting Gao, Xiujuan Jing, Hong Liu, Xuebing Jing","doi":"10.1055/a-2424-2103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Ensuring the security of nursing information holds substantial importance. The awareness of information security among nurses in China is generally inadequate, and there is a lack of standardized evaluation tools for nurse information security in nursing practice. The nursing sector necessitates the establishment of a robust culture surrounding information security. Objective The aim of this study was to construct a self-reporting instrument for evaluating nursing information security. Methods The research team utilized literature analysis and group discussions to draft the item pool. After two rounds of Delphi consultation by 15 experts and pilot testing, the initial questionnaire was formed. Item analysis was carried out on the questionnaire, and the validity and reliability of the instrument were statistically tested by computing the Keiser-Meier-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett tests, an exploratory factor analysis, a confirmatory factor analysis, convergent and discriminative validity, descriptive statistics, Cronbach's α and test-retest reliability. Results A total of 501 nurses participated in the study, supplemented by the inclusion of five experts who were invited to contribute to the assessment of content validity. Four factors were formed using exploratory factor analysis (n=250), and the cumulative variance contribution rate was found to be 60.10%. The confirmatory factor analysis (n=251) showed the model fit was good. The overall Cronbach's α coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.948, and the test-retest reliability was 0.837. Conclusion Finally, the NIS-Q with 38 items and three dimensions of knowledge, attitude and practice were formed. A promising assessment instrument for gauging the degree of nursing information security was introduced. Further, a foundational platform was established for implementing specific enhancement strategies aimed at advancing nursing information security.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2424-2103","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Ensuring the security of nursing information holds substantial importance. The awareness of information security among nurses in China is generally inadequate, and there is a lack of standardized evaluation tools for nurse information security in nursing practice. The nursing sector necessitates the establishment of a robust culture surrounding information security. Objective The aim of this study was to construct a self-reporting instrument for evaluating nursing information security. Methods The research team utilized literature analysis and group discussions to draft the item pool. After two rounds of Delphi consultation by 15 experts and pilot testing, the initial questionnaire was formed. Item analysis was carried out on the questionnaire, and the validity and reliability of the instrument were statistically tested by computing the Keiser-Meier-Olkin (KMO) and Bartlett tests, an exploratory factor analysis, a confirmatory factor analysis, convergent and discriminative validity, descriptive statistics, Cronbach's α and test-retest reliability. Results A total of 501 nurses participated in the study, supplemented by the inclusion of five experts who were invited to contribute to the assessment of content validity. Four factors were formed using exploratory factor analysis (n=250), and the cumulative variance contribution rate was found to be 60.10%. The confirmatory factor analysis (n=251) showed the model fit was good. The overall Cronbach's α coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.948, and the test-retest reliability was 0.837. Conclusion Finally, the NIS-Q with 38 items and three dimensions of knowledge, attitude and practice were formed. A promising assessment instrument for gauging the degree of nursing information security was introduced. Further, a foundational platform was established for implementing specific enhancement strategies aimed at advancing nursing information security.

开发和验证护理信息安全问卷。
背景 确保护理信息安全具有重要意义。我国护士对信息安全的认识普遍不足,护理实践中缺乏规范的护士信息安全评估工具。护理行业需要建立健全的信息安全文化。目的 本研究旨在构建一个自我报告的护理信息安全评估工具。方法 研究小组利用文献分析和小组讨论起草了项目库。经过 15 位专家两轮德尔菲咨询和试点测试,形成了初步问卷。对问卷进行了项目分析,并通过计算 Keiser-Meier-Olkin (KMO) 和 Bartlett 检验、探索性因子分析、确认性因子分析、收敛效度和区分效度、描述性统计、Cronbach's α 和测试-再测信度对问卷的效度和信度进行了统计检验。结果 共有 501 名护士参与了研究,并邀请了五位专家参与内容效度评估。通过探索性因子分析(n=250)形成了四个因子,累计方差贡献率为 60.10%。确认性因子分析(n=251)显示模型拟合良好。问卷的总体 Cronbach's α 系数为 0.948,测试-再测信度为 0.837。结论 最后,38 个项目和知识、态度和实践三个维度的 NIS-Q 形成。为衡量护理信息安全程度提供了一个有前途的评估工具。此外,还为实施旨在提高护理信息安全的具体改进策略建立了基础平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信