Effects of an untreated medial meniscal ramp lesion on histological deterioration findings of the medial meniscus: A study in a porcine anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction model

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Akihiro Saitsu, Tsuneari Takahashi, Hibiki Kakiage, Kazuhisa Hatayama, Tatsuya Kubo, Yuta Matsumoto, Katsushi Takeshita
{"title":"Effects of an untreated medial meniscal ramp lesion on histological deterioration findings of the medial meniscus: A study in a porcine anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction model","authors":"Akihiro Saitsu,&nbsp;Tsuneari Takahashi,&nbsp;Hibiki Kakiage,&nbsp;Kazuhisa Hatayama,&nbsp;Tatsuya Kubo,&nbsp;Yuta Matsumoto,&nbsp;Katsushi Takeshita","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the effect of untreated medial meniscal ramp lesions (MMRLs) on the tendon graft after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and histological findings of medial meniscus (MM) in a porcine a model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 17 pigs were divided into two groups: (1) the untreated MMRL group (UM group, <i>n</i> = 9) and (2) intact MM group (<i>n</i> = 8) and euthanized 12 weeks after surgery. The specimens were then tested cyclically and loaded to failure. Side-to-side differences (SSDs) in translation under cyclic loading and structural properties were analyzed. Histological evaluation of the MM was also performed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>No significant differences in the SSD in translation during the cyclic testing (UM group, 0.3 ± 0.4 mm; intact MM group, 0.1 ± 1.4 mm), upper yield load (UM group, 476.3 ± 399.9 N; intact MM group, 643.2 ± 302.9 N), maximum load (UM group, 539.5 ± 265.8 N; intact MM group, 705.8 ± 282.6 N), linear stiffness (UM group, 63.5 ± 39.0 N/mm; intact MM group, 73.7 ± 60.1 N/mm) and elongation at failure (UM group, −4.6 ± 16.3 mm; intact MM group, 2.3 ± 6.6 mm) were observed. However, the UM group had significantly worse Modified Mankin's histological grading scores (1.8 ± 0.4 [1–2] vs. 0 ± 0 [0]; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and Modified Copenhaver classification scores (6.6 ± 2.4 [2–9] vs. 0.7 ± 1.1 [0–3]; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) than did the intact MM group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Untreated MMRLs showed postoperative histological deterioration.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Level IV.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70027","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of untreated medial meniscal ramp lesions (MMRLs) on the tendon graft after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and histological findings of medial meniscus (MM) in a porcine a model.

Methods

A total of 17 pigs were divided into two groups: (1) the untreated MMRL group (UM group, n = 9) and (2) intact MM group (n = 8) and euthanized 12 weeks after surgery. The specimens were then tested cyclically and loaded to failure. Side-to-side differences (SSDs) in translation under cyclic loading and structural properties were analyzed. Histological evaluation of the MM was also performed.

Results

No significant differences in the SSD in translation during the cyclic testing (UM group, 0.3 ± 0.4 mm; intact MM group, 0.1 ± 1.4 mm), upper yield load (UM group, 476.3 ± 399.9 N; intact MM group, 643.2 ± 302.9 N), maximum load (UM group, 539.5 ± 265.8 N; intact MM group, 705.8 ± 282.6 N), linear stiffness (UM group, 63.5 ± 39.0 N/mm; intact MM group, 73.7 ± 60.1 N/mm) and elongation at failure (UM group, −4.6 ± 16.3 mm; intact MM group, 2.3 ± 6.6 mm) were observed. However, the UM group had significantly worse Modified Mankin's histological grading scores (1.8 ± 0.4 [1–2] vs. 0 ± 0 [0]; p < 0.001) and Modified Copenhaver classification scores (6.6 ± 2.4 [2–9] vs. 0.7 ± 1.1 [0–3]; p < 0.001) than did the intact MM group.

Conclusion

Untreated MMRLs showed postoperative histological deterioration.

Level of Evidence

Level IV.

Abstract Image

未经治疗的内侧半月板斜面损伤对内侧半月板组织学恶化结果的影响:猪前十字韧带重建模型研究
目的 在猪模型中评估未经处理的内侧半月板斜面损伤(MMRL)对前交叉韧带(ACL)重建后肌腱移植的影响以及内侧半月板(MM)的组织学结果。 方法 将 17 头猪分为两组:(1) 未经 MMRL 处理组(UM 组,n = 9)和 (2) 完整 MM 组(n = 8),术后 12 周安乐死。然后对这些试样进行周期性测试并加载至失效。分析了循环加载下平移的侧向差异(SSD)和结构特性。还对 MM 进行了组织学评估。 结果 在循环测试期间,平移的 SSD(UM 组,0.3 ± 0.4 mm;完整 MM 组,0.1 ± 1.4 mm)、上屈服载荷(UM 组,476.3 ± 399.9 N;完整 MM 组,643.2 ± 302.9 N)、最大载荷(UM 组,476.3 ± 399.9 N;完整 MM 组,643.2 ± 302.9 N)和结构特性均无明显差异。9 N)、最大载荷(UM 组,539.5 ± 265.8 N;完整 MM 组,705.8 ± 282.6 N)、线性刚度(UM 组,63.5 ± 39.0 N/mm;完整 MM 组,73.7 ± 60.1 N/mm)和破坏时伸长率(UM 组,-4.6 ± 16.3 mm;完整 MM 组,2.3 ± 6.6 mm)。然而,与完整 MM 组相比,UM 组的改良 Mankin 组织学分级评分(1.8 ± 0.4 [1-2] vs. 0 ± 0 [0];p < 0.001)和改良 Copenhaver 分类评分(6.6 ± 2.4 [2-9] vs. 0.7 ± 1.1 [0-3];p < 0.001)明显较差。 结论 未经治疗的MMRL术后组织学恶化。 证据等级 IV 级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信