Unravelling the discursive dynamics of counternarratives in the Dutch energy transition

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Naomi Schrandt , Julia M. Wittmayer , Tamara Metze
{"title":"Unravelling the discursive dynamics of counternarratives in the Dutch energy transition","authors":"Naomi Schrandt ,&nbsp;Julia M. Wittmayer ,&nbsp;Tamara Metze","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2024.101546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Decarbonization of the energy system to combat climate change poses a significant challenge for the Netherlands, often attributed to carbon lock-in: a persistent dependence on fossil fuels shaped by historical forces. Carbon lock-in also occurs at the discursive level, which is why research on sustainability transitions increasingly explores discourses as a crucial element for change. Our research contributes to this knowledge by exploring how counternarratives shape the discursive dynamics surrounding the fossil fuel industry's role in the Dutch energy system. Using an interpretive approach, we examine how the role of Shell, as the ‘epitome’ of the Dutch fossil fuel industry, is framed by both Shell itself and three discursive agents opposing fossil fuel-based pathways. To this end, we reconstruct the counternarratives by Friends of the Earth NL, Follow This, Code Rood and Shell around how they envision the role of Shell in the Dutch energy system, with the goal to identify how discursive agents position their narratives vis-à-vis each other and if coalitions are formed. Our findings reveal that discursive agents deploy a variety of strategic practices to increase the successful reproduction of their narratives: first, Code Rood strategically adopts a radical narrative that stimulates imagination, polarizing the discursive struggle surrounding Shell's role in the energy system. Second, Follow This strategically adopts a marginal narrative, designed to persuade incumbents of alternative interpretations, especially to rethink the profitability of fossil fuels. Third, Friends of the Earth NL and Follow This enhance their discursive agency through coalition building. Since unlocking institutionalized discourses becomes more important, further research should shed light on discursive dynamics within the institutionalized discourse. By offering insights into the pivotal role(s) of counternarratives in instigating discursive change, this study contributes to the growing body of knowledge crucial for accelerating the shift toward a decarbonized energy system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47848,"journal":{"name":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 101546"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X24001424","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Decarbonization of the energy system to combat climate change poses a significant challenge for the Netherlands, often attributed to carbon lock-in: a persistent dependence on fossil fuels shaped by historical forces. Carbon lock-in also occurs at the discursive level, which is why research on sustainability transitions increasingly explores discourses as a crucial element for change. Our research contributes to this knowledge by exploring how counternarratives shape the discursive dynamics surrounding the fossil fuel industry's role in the Dutch energy system. Using an interpretive approach, we examine how the role of Shell, as the ‘epitome’ of the Dutch fossil fuel industry, is framed by both Shell itself and three discursive agents opposing fossil fuel-based pathways. To this end, we reconstruct the counternarratives by Friends of the Earth NL, Follow This, Code Rood and Shell around how they envision the role of Shell in the Dutch energy system, with the goal to identify how discursive agents position their narratives vis-à-vis each other and if coalitions are formed. Our findings reveal that discursive agents deploy a variety of strategic practices to increase the successful reproduction of their narratives: first, Code Rood strategically adopts a radical narrative that stimulates imagination, polarizing the discursive struggle surrounding Shell's role in the energy system. Second, Follow This strategically adopts a marginal narrative, designed to persuade incumbents of alternative interpretations, especially to rethink the profitability of fossil fuels. Third, Friends of the Earth NL and Follow This enhance their discursive agency through coalition building. Since unlocking institutionalized discourses becomes more important, further research should shed light on discursive dynamics within the institutionalized discourse. By offering insights into the pivotal role(s) of counternarratives in instigating discursive change, this study contributes to the growing body of knowledge crucial for accelerating the shift toward a decarbonized energy system.
揭示荷兰能源转型中反面叙述的话语动力
为应对气候变化而实现能源系统的去碳化对荷兰构成了重大挑战,这通常归因于碳锁定:历史力量形成的对化石燃料的持久依赖。碳锁定也发生在话语层面,这就是为什么有关可持续性转型的研究越来越多地将话语作为变革的关键因素加以探讨。我们的研究通过探讨反叙述如何塑造化石燃料行业在荷兰能源体系中的作用的话语动态,为这方面的知识做出了贡献。我们采用解释学方法,研究了壳牌作为荷兰化石燃料行业的 "缩影",是如何被壳牌本身和三个反对以化石燃料为基础的发展道路的话语主体所塑造的。为此,我们重新构建了荷兰地球之友、Follow This、Code Rood 和壳牌公司围绕他们如何设想壳牌公司在荷兰能源系统中的角色所做的反叙述,目的是确定话语代理如何将他们的叙述定位为相互对立,以及是否形成了联盟。我们的研究结果表明,话语主体采取了多种策略,以提高其叙事的成功复制率:首先,"鲁德代码"(Code Rood)策略性地采用了激进叙事,激发人们的想象力,使围绕壳牌在能源系统中的角色的话语斗争两极化。其次,"照着做"(Follow This)策略性地采用边缘叙事,旨在说服现任者做出其他解释,尤其是重新思考化石燃料的盈利能力。第三,荷兰地球之友和 "跟进 "组织通过建立联盟来增强其话语权。由于开启制度化话语变得更加重要,进一步的研究应揭示制度化话语中的话语动态。通过深入了解反叙述在推动话语变革中的关键作用,本研究为不断增长的知识体系做出了贡献,这些知识对于加快向低碳化能源系统的转变至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信