Does participatory research stimulate sustained adoption of energy technologies? Lessons from stove dissemination in Gurué district, rural Mozambique

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
{"title":"Does participatory research stimulate sustained adoption of energy technologies? Lessons from stove dissemination in Gurué district, rural Mozambique","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research on energy transition to clean cooking suggests that the use of participatory approaches to design and evaluate the project impacts results in sustained adoption, user satisfaction, and continuous knowledge exchange between scientists and local stakeholders. However, the results of participatory approaches are mixed, and studies on long-term effects are rather scarce. This study uses an experimental design to test whether high stakeholder involvement in a participatory research approach is an effective tool for promoting the adoption of improved cookstoves. Data were collected from 138 participatory research participants and 448 conventional training participants. The results showed that participatory research is essential to stimulate early adoption, but is not sufficient to sustain adoption over time. Based on the results, we conclude that organizations implementing stove programs should not only consider strategies to encourage deep participation of potential beneficiaries in various stages (including planning, designing, testing, and modifying of improved cookstoves), but follow-up support should also occur. To sustain adoption, participation should be designed as a process that understands the mechanisms of unsustainable practices and the social demand for new technologies, going beyond adoption and promoting co-construction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24002707","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on energy transition to clean cooking suggests that the use of participatory approaches to design and evaluate the project impacts results in sustained adoption, user satisfaction, and continuous knowledge exchange between scientists and local stakeholders. However, the results of participatory approaches are mixed, and studies on long-term effects are rather scarce. This study uses an experimental design to test whether high stakeholder involvement in a participatory research approach is an effective tool for promoting the adoption of improved cookstoves. Data were collected from 138 participatory research participants and 448 conventional training participants. The results showed that participatory research is essential to stimulate early adoption, but is not sufficient to sustain adoption over time. Based on the results, we conclude that organizations implementing stove programs should not only consider strategies to encourage deep participation of potential beneficiaries in various stages (including planning, designing, testing, and modifying of improved cookstoves), but follow-up support should also occur. To sustain adoption, participation should be designed as a process that understands the mechanisms of unsustainable practices and the social demand for new technologies, going beyond adoption and promoting co-construction.
参与式研究能否促进能源技术的持续采用?莫桑比克农村古鲁埃地区炉灶推广的经验教训
有关能源向清洁烹饪过渡的研究表明,采用参与式方法设计和评估项目影响,可以持续采用项目,提高用户满意度,并促进科学家和当地利益相关者之间的持续知识交流。然而,参与式方法的结果好坏参半,对长期效果的研究也相当匮乏。本研究采用实验设计,检验利益相关者高度参与参与式研究方法是否是促进采用改良炉灶的有效工具。研究收集了 138 名参与式研究参与者和 448 名传统培训参与者的数据。结果表明,参与式研究对于促进早期采用至关重要,但不足以维持长期采用。根据研究结果,我们得出结论:实施炉灶计划的组织不仅应考虑采取策略,鼓励潜在受益者深入参与各个阶段(包括改良炉灶的规划、设计、测试和修改),而且还应提供后续支持。为了保持采用率,应将参与设计为一个过程,了解不可持续做法的机制和社会对新技术的需求,超越采用并促进共同建设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信