China's reaction to the Russia–Ukraine war: A test case for a global ‘Pax Sinica’?

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Björn Alexander Düben
{"title":"China's reaction to the Russia–Ukraine war: A test case for a global ‘Pax Sinica’?","authors":"Björn Alexander Düben","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.13359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines the Chinese government's stance on the Russia–Ukraine war, including the recent development of China's economic relations with Russia. It assesses the factors that have influenced Beijing's position and the narrative it has used to explain it. Considering China's outsized importance for global events, the article also explores what implications its positioning regarding the war can have for the future of the global order. Since Russia's invasion began, China's government has presented itself as a neutral party, but it has de facto adopted a pro-Russian position in the conflict. Beijing has primarily framed its stance on Ukraine in security terms, embedded in what is essentially a Realist narrative interlinked with pre-existing ideological worldviews among China's political elites. It has condoned Russia's invasion on the grounds that Moscow is defending its ‘legitimate security interests’, which is an implicit appeal to respect a great power's sphere of influence, even at the expense of smaller states' sovereignty. While this raises questions about the compatibility of Beijing's vision of global order with the broader interests of most other states of the Global South, China (alongside Russia) has intensified its efforts to court these states in the context of the Russia–Ukraine war.</p>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.13359","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the Chinese government's stance on the Russia–Ukraine war, including the recent development of China's economic relations with Russia. It assesses the factors that have influenced Beijing's position and the narrative it has used to explain it. Considering China's outsized importance for global events, the article also explores what implications its positioning regarding the war can have for the future of the global order. Since Russia's invasion began, China's government has presented itself as a neutral party, but it has de facto adopted a pro-Russian position in the conflict. Beijing has primarily framed its stance on Ukraine in security terms, embedded in what is essentially a Realist narrative interlinked with pre-existing ideological worldviews among China's political elites. It has condoned Russia's invasion on the grounds that Moscow is defending its ‘legitimate security interests’, which is an implicit appeal to respect a great power's sphere of influence, even at the expense of smaller states' sovereignty. While this raises questions about the compatibility of Beijing's vision of global order with the broader interests of most other states of the Global South, China (alongside Russia) has intensified its efforts to court these states in the context of the Russia–Ukraine war.

中国对俄乌战争的反应:全球 "中国大同 "的试验?
本文探讨了中国政府对俄乌战争的立场,包括中国与俄罗斯经济关系的最新发展。文章评估了影响中国政府立场的因素,以及中国政府为解释其立场而使用的说法。考虑到中国在全球事件中举足轻重的地位,文章还探讨了中国在这场战争中的定位对全球秩序的未来有何影响。自俄罗斯开始入侵以来,中国政府一直以中立者自居,但事实上却在冲突中采取了亲俄立场。中国政府主要从安全角度阐述其在乌克兰问题上的立场,这种立场本质上是一种现实主义叙事,与中国政治精英原有的意识形态世界观相互关联。中国以莫斯科正在捍卫其 "合法安全利益 "为由纵容了俄罗斯的入侵,这是在暗中呼吁尊重大国的势力范围,甚至不惜牺牲小国的主权。虽然这让人怀疑中国政府的全球秩序观是否符合全球南部大多数其他国家的广泛利益,但中国(与俄罗斯一道)在俄乌战争的背景下加大了对这些国家的讨好力度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Policy
Global Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
125
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信