Air pollutant exposure concentrations from cooking a meal with a gas or induction cooktop and the effectiveness of two recirculating range hoods with filters

Jiayu Li , Haoran Zhao , Marion L. Russell , William W. Delp , Alexandra Johnson , Xiaochen Tang , Iain S. Walker , Brett C. Singer
{"title":"Air pollutant exposure concentrations from cooking a meal with a gas or induction cooktop and the effectiveness of two recirculating range hoods with filters","authors":"Jiayu Li ,&nbsp;Haoran Zhao ,&nbsp;Marion L. Russell ,&nbsp;William W. Delp ,&nbsp;Alexandra Johnson ,&nbsp;Xiaochen Tang ,&nbsp;Iain S. Walker ,&nbsp;Brett C. Singer","doi":"10.1016/j.indenv.2024.100047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study compares air pollutant concentrations resulting from cooking with gas or induction cooktops, with or without either of two recirculating range hoods with filters. A meal of pasta, plant-based “meat” sauce and stir-fried broccoli was cooked three times for each cooktop and hood combination in a 158 m<sup>3</sup> room. Time-resolved measurements were made of nitrogen oxides (NO<sub>X</sub>), carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), size-resolved particles, and speciated volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during cooking and 30 minutes after cooking. Cooking with induction used half as much energy, produced no discernible NO<sub>X</sub>, and significantly reduced ultrafine particles (UFP, diameter &lt; 100 nm) and CO<sub>2</sub> compared to gas cooktops. Induction produced statistically higher PM<sub>2.5</sub> when calculated using size-resolved particle measurements from one pair of instruments, but the difference was not discernible when calculating from another pair. With gas cooktops, roughly half of the PM<sub>2.5</sub> was in particles smaller than 0.3 μm and thus below the lower quantitation threshold for many optical particle instruments; optical devices may thus substantially under-report PM<sub>2.5</sub> from gas cooking. VOCs did not significantly differ between gas and induction. Both recirculating range hoods substantially reduced all particle sizes when cooking with either fuel, and the reductions were larger for gas cooking. One of the range hoods also substantially lowered some of the VOCs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100665,"journal":{"name":"Indoor Environments","volume":"1 4","pages":"Article 100047"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indoor Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950362024000444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study compares air pollutant concentrations resulting from cooking with gas or induction cooktops, with or without either of two recirculating range hoods with filters. A meal of pasta, plant-based “meat” sauce and stir-fried broccoli was cooked three times for each cooktop and hood combination in a 158 m3 room. Time-resolved measurements were made of nitrogen oxides (NOX), carbon dioxide (CO2), size-resolved particles, and speciated volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during cooking and 30 minutes after cooking. Cooking with induction used half as much energy, produced no discernible NOX, and significantly reduced ultrafine particles (UFP, diameter < 100 nm) and CO2 compared to gas cooktops. Induction produced statistically higher PM2.5 when calculated using size-resolved particle measurements from one pair of instruments, but the difference was not discernible when calculating from another pair. With gas cooktops, roughly half of the PM2.5 was in particles smaller than 0.3 μm and thus below the lower quantitation threshold for many optical particle instruments; optical devices may thus substantially under-report PM2.5 from gas cooking. VOCs did not significantly differ between gas and induction. Both recirculating range hoods substantially reduced all particle sizes when cooking with either fuel, and the reductions were larger for gas cooking. One of the range hoods also substantially lowered some of the VOCs.
使用燃气灶或电磁炉烹饪食物时的空气污染物暴露浓度,以及两种带过滤器的循环式抽油烟机的效果
这项研究比较了使用燃气灶或电磁炉烹饪时产生的空气污染物浓度,以及是否使用两种带过滤器的循环式抽油烟机中的任何一种。在一个 158 立方米的房间里,用每种灶具和抽油烟机组合烹饪了三次意大利面、植物 "肉 "酱和炒西兰花。在烹饪过程中和烹饪后 30 分钟内,对氮氧化物 (NOX)、二氧化碳 (CO2)、大小分辨颗粒和特定挥发性有机化合物 (VOC) 进行了时间分辨测量。与燃气灶相比,电磁炉烹饪使用的能量是燃气灶的一半,不产生明显的氮氧化物,并显著减少了超细粒子(UFP,直径< 100 nm)和二氧化碳。在使用一对仪器的粒度分辨测量结果进行计算时,电磁炉产生的 PM2.5 在统计学上更高,但在使用另一对仪器进行计算时,则无法辨别两者之间的差异。在燃气灶中,大约一半的 PM2.5 是小于 0.3 μm 的颗粒,因此低于许多光学颗粒仪器的较低定量阈值;因此,光学设备可能会大大低估燃气烹饪产生的 PM2.5。燃气灶和电磁炉的挥发性有机化合物没有明显差异。在使用任何一种燃料烹饪时,两种循环式抽油烟机都能大幅减少所有颗粒大小,而燃气烹饪的减少幅度更大。其中一台抽油烟机还大幅减少了部分挥发性有机化合物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信