Reevaluating the role of heparin during mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: Increased risks without functional benefit

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Seyed Behnam Jazayeri , Sherief Ghozy , Ram Saha , Aryan Gajjar , Mohamed Elfil , David F. Kallmes
{"title":"Reevaluating the role of heparin during mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: Increased risks without functional benefit","authors":"Seyed Behnam Jazayeri ,&nbsp;Sherief Ghozy ,&nbsp;Ram Saha ,&nbsp;Aryan Gajjar ,&nbsp;Mohamed Elfil ,&nbsp;David F. Kallmes","doi":"10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Heparin may be administered during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusions (AIS-LVO), with the aim of enhancing reperfusion and improving patient outcomes. The uncertain balance between risks and benefits of administering heparin during MT prompted us to perform this systematic review and meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus to find studies that report the safety or efficacy of administering heparin during MT for AIS-LVO. Meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model. In case of significant heterogeneity a subgroup analysis was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 2398 screened records, we included 15 studies. Rate of favorable functional outcome (90 day modified Rankin Scale 0–2 (mRS 0–2)) was lower among patients who received heparin (OR, 0.88 [95 %CI 0.79–0.98]; p=.023). Risk of distal embolization was higher in patients who received heparin (OR, 1.25 [95 %CI 1.01–1.55]; p=.04). The subgroup analysis showed that patients who received intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) had higher risk of Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) (OR, 2.94 [95 %CI 1.30–6.63]; p=.009) and lower rate of mRS 0–2 (OR, 0.66 [95 %CI 0.50–0.87]; p=.004). Heparin use didn’t affect successful reperfusion rate (Thrombolysis in cerebral infarction ≥2B), mortality or any ICH risk.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Overall, our analysis indicates that administering heparin during MT for AIS-LVO correlates with worse clinical outcomes and increased distal embolization rates. Moreover, it is linked to a higher risk of sICH in patients who receive IVT. Consequently, the routine utilization of heparin during MT should be reconsidered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10385,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","volume":"246 ","pages":"Article 108560"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846724004475","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Heparin may be administered during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusions (AIS-LVO), with the aim of enhancing reperfusion and improving patient outcomes. The uncertain balance between risks and benefits of administering heparin during MT prompted us to perform this systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus to find studies that report the safety or efficacy of administering heparin during MT for AIS-LVO. Meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model. In case of significant heterogeneity a subgroup analysis was performed.

Results

From 2398 screened records, we included 15 studies. Rate of favorable functional outcome (90 day modified Rankin Scale 0–2 (mRS 0–2)) was lower among patients who received heparin (OR, 0.88 [95 %CI 0.79–0.98]; p=.023). Risk of distal embolization was higher in patients who received heparin (OR, 1.25 [95 %CI 1.01–1.55]; p=.04). The subgroup analysis showed that patients who received intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) had higher risk of Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) (OR, 2.94 [95 %CI 1.30–6.63]; p=.009) and lower rate of mRS 0–2 (OR, 0.66 [95 %CI 0.50–0.87]; p=.004). Heparin use didn’t affect successful reperfusion rate (Thrombolysis in cerebral infarction ≥2B), mortality or any ICH risk.

Conclusion

Overall, our analysis indicates that administering heparin during MT for AIS-LVO correlates with worse clinical outcomes and increased distal embolization rates. Moreover, it is linked to a higher risk of sICH in patients who receive IVT. Consequently, the routine utilization of heparin during MT should be reconsidered.
重新评估肝素在急性缺血性脑卒中机械性血栓切除术中的作用:风险增加却无功能性益处
背景在大血管闭塞(AIS-LVO)导致的急性缺血性卒中的机械取栓术(MT)中可使用肝素,目的是加强再灌注并改善患者预后。方法在PubMed、Embase和Scopus上进行了全面检索,以找到报告AIS-LVO MT期间使用肝素的安全性或有效性的研究。采用随机效应模型进行了 Meta 分析。结果从 2398 条筛选记录中,我们纳入了 15 项研究。接受肝素治疗的患者的良好功能预后率(90 天改良 Rankin 量表 0-2 (mRS 0-2))较低(OR, 0.88 [95 %CI 0.79-0.98]; p=0.023)。接受肝素治疗的患者发生远端栓塞的风险更高(OR,1.25 [95 %CI 1.01-1.55];P=.04)。亚组分析显示,接受静脉溶栓(IVT)的患者发生症状性颅内出血(sICH)的风险较高(OR,2.94 [95 %CI 1.30-6.63];p=.009),mRS 0-2 的比例较低(OR,0.66 [95 %CI 0.50-0.87];p=.004)。总之,我们的分析表明,在 MT 治疗 AIS-LVO 期间使用肝素与较差的临床预后和较高的远端栓塞率相关。此外,它还与接受 IVT 的患者发生 sICH 的风险较高有关。因此,应重新考虑在 MT 期间常规使用肝素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
358
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery is devoted to publishing papers and reports on the clinical aspects of neurology and neurosurgery. It is an international forum for papers of high scientific standard that are of interest to Neurologists and Neurosurgeons world-wide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信