Micro-bacterial assessment of disposable gowns with a focus on green endoscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures: A Japanese pilot study for healthcare waste reduction

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
DEN open Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1002/deo2.70016
Sakiko Naito, Itaru Nakamura, Takahiro Muramatsu, Yasuyuki Kagawa, Masakatsu Fukuzawa, Takao Itoi
{"title":"Micro-bacterial assessment of disposable gowns with a focus on green endoscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures: A Japanese pilot study for healthcare waste reduction","authors":"Sakiko Naito,&nbsp;Itaru Nakamura,&nbsp;Takahiro Muramatsu,&nbsp;Yasuyuki Kagawa,&nbsp;Masakatsu Fukuzawa,&nbsp;Takao Itoi","doi":"10.1002/deo2.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to implement green endoscopy through the microbiological assessment of gowning techniques during endoscopy to reduce carbon emissions and separate medical waste.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-five patients who performed esophagogastroduodenoscopy from March to May 2024 were included in this study. Four sections of the isolation gowns (anterior, posterior, right, and left) were cut into 2 cm<sup>2</sup> after endoscopy, and the rate of microbial contamination was examined using the stamp method.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The endoscopic examination time was 8 min (6−12), and endoscopy was performed by 10 expert endoscopists, six endoscopists, and nine residents. The overall isolation gown contamination rate was 56%, with 25%, 20.8%, 20.8%, and 33.3% in the front, back, as well as right and left arms, respectively. The rates of isolation gown contamination rates in the expert endoscopists, endoscopists, and residents groups were 30%, 50%, and 77.8%, respectively, with a higher rate in the residents group. Regardless of the physician's performance, bacterial detection was consistently higher in the left arm (42.9% vs. 40% vs. 25%; <i>p</i> = 0.093). The detected bacteria comprised 58% Gram-positive and 42% Gram-negative organisms, including those from tap water used for endoscopy bacteria and obtained from the participant's skin or mouth. No pathogenic organisms were detected.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The bacteria detected in disposable gowns after gastrointestinal endoscopy were non-pathogenic. Thus, our findings suggest that changing all personal protective equipment of respective endoscopes might not be essential. We advocate for green endoscopy to achieve sustainable development goals and reduce medical waste.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/deo2.70016","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to implement green endoscopy through the microbiological assessment of gowning techniques during endoscopy to reduce carbon emissions and separate medical waste.

Methods

Twenty-five patients who performed esophagogastroduodenoscopy from March to May 2024 were included in this study. Four sections of the isolation gowns (anterior, posterior, right, and left) were cut into 2 cm2 after endoscopy, and the rate of microbial contamination was examined using the stamp method.

Results

The endoscopic examination time was 8 min (6−12), and endoscopy was performed by 10 expert endoscopists, six endoscopists, and nine residents. The overall isolation gown contamination rate was 56%, with 25%, 20.8%, 20.8%, and 33.3% in the front, back, as well as right and left arms, respectively. The rates of isolation gown contamination rates in the expert endoscopists, endoscopists, and residents groups were 30%, 50%, and 77.8%, respectively, with a higher rate in the residents group. Regardless of the physician's performance, bacterial detection was consistently higher in the left arm (42.9% vs. 40% vs. 25%; p = 0.093). The detected bacteria comprised 58% Gram-positive and 42% Gram-negative organisms, including those from tap water used for endoscopy bacteria and obtained from the participant's skin or mouth. No pathogenic organisms were detected.

Conclusions

The bacteria detected in disposable gowns after gastrointestinal endoscopy were non-pathogenic. Thus, our findings suggest that changing all personal protective equipment of respective endoscopes might not be essential. We advocate for green endoscopy to achieve sustainable development goals and reduce medical waste.

Abstract Image

一次性手术衣的微生物细菌评估,重点关注胃肠道内窥镜检查过程中的绿色内窥镜检查:日本减少医疗废物试点研究
目的 本研究旨在通过对内镜检查过程中的穿袍技术进行微生物学评估,实施绿色内镜检查,以减少碳排放和分类医疗废物。 方法 2024 年 3 月至 5 月期间,25 名患者接受了食管胃十二指肠镜检查。内镜检查后,将隔离衣的四个部分(前、后、右、左)剪成 2 平方厘米,采用印章法检测微生物污染率。 结果 内镜检查时间为 8 分钟(6-12 分钟),内镜检查由 10 名内镜专家、6 名内镜医师和 9 名住院医师完成。总体隔离衣污染率为 56%,其中前臂、后臂、左右臂的污染率分别为 25%、20.8%、20.8% 和 33.3%。内镜专家组、内镜医师组和住院医师组的隔离衣污染率分别为 30%、50% 和 77.8%,住院医师组的污染率更高。无论医生的表现如何,左臂的细菌检出率一直较高(42.9% vs. 40% vs. 25%; p = 0.093)。检测到的细菌包括 58% 的革兰氏阳性菌和 42% 的革兰氏阴性菌,其中包括内窥镜细菌检查所用自来水中的细菌和从参与者皮肤或口腔中获得的细菌。没有检测到致病微生物。 结论 胃肠道内窥镜检查后在一次性手术衣中检测到的细菌均为非致病菌。因此,我们的研究结果表明,更换各自内窥镜的所有个人防护设备可能并非必要。我们提倡绿色内镜检查,以实现可持续发展目标并减少医疗废物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信