Associations of close social connections with smoking and vaping: a population study in England.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sarah E Jackson, Hazel Squires, Lion Shahab, Harry Tattan-Birch, Charlotte Buckley, Robin C Purshouse, Jamie Brown
{"title":"Associations of close social connections with smoking and vaping: a population study in England.","authors":"Sarah E Jackson, Hazel Squires, Lion Shahab, Harry Tattan-Birch, Charlotte Buckley, Robin C Purshouse, Jamie Brown","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Studies consistently demonstrate smoking is a socially contagious behaviour, but less is known about the influence of social connections on vaping. This study examined associations between having close social connections who smoke or vape and relevant smoking and vaping outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a representative cross-sectional survey of adults (≥16y) in England. Participants (n=1,618) were asked how many people they discuss important matters with (i.e., close social connections) and how many of them smoke/vape. We tested associations between (i) smoking and (ii) vaping among close social connections and participants' own smoking and vaping status; harm perceptions of e-cigarettes (among current smokers); attempts and success in quitting smoking (among past-year smokers); and use of e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation aid (among past-year smokers who tried to quit).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adults with ≥1 close social connection who smoke were more likely than those with none to smoke themselves (32.8% vs. 9.4%; ORadj=7.23[95%CI 4.74-11.0]) and had an uncertain lower likelihood to quit (12.2% vs. 19.8%; ORadj=0.46[0.17-1.23]). Those with ≥1 close social connection who vape were more likely than those with none to vape themselves (29.6% vs. 6.3%; ORadj=5.16[3.15-8.43]) and to use e-cigarettes in their most recent attempt to quit (57.0% vs. 27.9%; ORadj=18.0[1.80-181]), and had an uncertain higher likelihood to perceive e-cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes (30.8% vs. 12.2%; ORadj=2.37[0.82-6.90]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In England, we replicated well-established associations with smoking and found similar evidence for vaping. People were much more likely to vape and to use e-cigarettes to quit smoking if they had close social connections who vaped.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The cross-sectional design means it is not clear whether smoking/vaping among close social connections influences people to smoke/vape themselves, or whether people who smoke/vape select to form close social connections with others who similarly smoke/vape. Further research is required to establish causality. If the associations we observed are causal, interventions that encourage smokers to switch to vaping may have positive spillover effects on social connections' perceptions of e-cigarettes and use of these products to support smoking cessation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae225","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Studies consistently demonstrate smoking is a socially contagious behaviour, but less is known about the influence of social connections on vaping. This study examined associations between having close social connections who smoke or vape and relevant smoking and vaping outcomes.

Methods: This was a representative cross-sectional survey of adults (≥16y) in England. Participants (n=1,618) were asked how many people they discuss important matters with (i.e., close social connections) and how many of them smoke/vape. We tested associations between (i) smoking and (ii) vaping among close social connections and participants' own smoking and vaping status; harm perceptions of e-cigarettes (among current smokers); attempts and success in quitting smoking (among past-year smokers); and use of e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation aid (among past-year smokers who tried to quit).

Results: Adults with ≥1 close social connection who smoke were more likely than those with none to smoke themselves (32.8% vs. 9.4%; ORadj=7.23[95%CI 4.74-11.0]) and had an uncertain lower likelihood to quit (12.2% vs. 19.8%; ORadj=0.46[0.17-1.23]). Those with ≥1 close social connection who vape were more likely than those with none to vape themselves (29.6% vs. 6.3%; ORadj=5.16[3.15-8.43]) and to use e-cigarettes in their most recent attempt to quit (57.0% vs. 27.9%; ORadj=18.0[1.80-181]), and had an uncertain higher likelihood to perceive e-cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes (30.8% vs. 12.2%; ORadj=2.37[0.82-6.90]).

Conclusions: In England, we replicated well-established associations with smoking and found similar evidence for vaping. People were much more likely to vape and to use e-cigarettes to quit smoking if they had close social connections who vaped.

Implications: The cross-sectional design means it is not clear whether smoking/vaping among close social connections influences people to smoke/vape themselves, or whether people who smoke/vape select to form close social connections with others who similarly smoke/vape. Further research is required to establish causality. If the associations we observed are causal, interventions that encourage smokers to switch to vaping may have positive spillover effects on social connections' perceptions of e-cigarettes and use of these products to support smoking cessation.

密切社会关系与吸烟和吸食毒品的关系:英格兰人口研究。
导言:研究不断证明吸烟是一种具有社会传染性的行为,但人们对社会关系对吸烟的影响却知之甚少。本研究探讨了与吸烟或吸食毒品者有密切社会关系与吸烟和吸食毒品的相关结果之间的关系:这是一项针对英格兰成年人(≥16 岁)的代表性横断面调查。参与者(n=1,618)被问及有多少人与他们讨论重要事项(即密切的社会关系)以及其中有多少人吸烟/吸食毒品。我们测试了(i)密切社交关系中的吸烟和(ii)吸食电子烟与参与者自身的吸烟和吸食电子烟状况、对电子烟危害的认知(在当前吸烟者中)、戒烟尝试和成功率(在过去一年的吸烟者中)以及使用电子烟作为戒烟辅助工具(在过去一年尝试戒烟的吸烟者中)之间的关联:有≥1个密切社会关系的成年人比没有密切社会关系的成年人更有可能自己吸烟(32.8% vs. 9.4%;ORadj=7.23[95%CI 4.74-11.0]),而且戒烟的可能性较低(12.2% vs. 19.8%;ORadj=0.46[0.17-1.23])。有≥1 个密切社会关系的吸烟者比没有密切社会关系的吸烟者更有可能自己吸烟(29.6% vs. 6.3%;ORadj=5.16[3.15-8.43]),并在最近的戒烟尝试中使用电子烟(57.0% vs. 27.9%)。0%对27.9%;ORadj=18.0[1.80-181]),并且认为电子烟比香烟危害小的可能性更高(30.8%对12.2%;ORadj=2.37[0.82-6.90]):在英格兰,我们复制了与吸烟有关的公认关联,并在吸食电子烟方面发现了类似的证据。如果人们有吸食电子烟的亲密社会关系,他们吸食电子烟和使用电子烟戒烟的可能性就会大得多:横断面设计意味着尚不清楚亲密社交关系中的吸烟/吸食行为是否会影响人们自己吸烟/吸食行为,或者吸烟/吸食行为的人是否会选择与同样吸烟/吸食行为的人建立亲密的社交关系。要确定因果关系,还需要进一步的研究。如果我们观察到的关联是因果关系,那么鼓励吸烟者改吸电子烟的干预措施可能会对社会关系中人对电子烟的看法以及使用这些产品支持戒烟产生积极的溢出效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信