{"title":"Accelerating FLAIR imaging via deep learning reconstruction: potential for evaluating white matter hyperintensities.","authors":"Noriko Nishioka, Yukie Shimizu, Yukio Kaneko, Toru Shirai, Atsuro Suzuki, Tomoki Amemiya, Hisaaki Ochi, Yoshitaka Bito, Masahiro Takizawa, Yohei Ikebe, Hiroyuki Kameda, Taisuke Harada, Noriyuki Fujima, Kohsuke Kudo","doi":"10.1007/s11604-024-01666-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate deep learning-reconstructed (DLR)-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images generated from undersampled data, compare them with fully sampled and rapidly acquired FLAIR images, and assess their potential for white matter hyperintensity evaluation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We examined 30 patients with white matter hyperintensities, obtaining fully sampled FLAIR images (standard FLAIR, std-FLAIR). We created accelerated FLAIR (acc-FLAIR) images using one-third of the fully sampled data and applied deep learning to generate DLR-FLAIR images. Three neuroradiologists assessed the quality (amount of noise and gray/white matter contrast) in all three image types. The reproducibility of hyperintensities was evaluated by comparing a subset of 100 hyperintensities in acc-FLAIR and DLR-FLAIR images with those in the std-FLAIR images. Quantitatively, similarities and errors of the entire image and the focused regions on white matter hyperintensities in acc-FLAIR and DLR-FLAIR images were measured against std-FLAIR images using structural similarity index measure (SSIM), regional SSIM, normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), and regional NRMSE values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three neuroradiologists evaluated DLR-FLAIR as having significantly less noise and higher image quality scores compared with std-FLAIR and acc-FLAIR (p < 0.001). All three neuroradiologists assigned significantly higher frontal lobe gray/white matter visibility scores for DLR-FLAIR than for acc-FLAIR (p < 0.001); two neuroradiologists attributed significantly higher scores for DLR-FLAIR than for std-FLAIR (p < 0.05). Regarding white matter hyperintensities, all three neuroradiologists significantly preferred DLR-FLAIR (p < 0.0001). DLR-FLAIR exhibited higher similarity to std-FLAIR in terms of visibility of the hyperintensities, with 97% of the hyperintensities rated as nearly identical or equivalent. Quantitatively, DLR-FLAIR demonstrated significantly higher SSIM and regional SSIM values than acc-FLAIR, with significantly lower NRMSE and regional NRMSE values (p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DLR-FLAIR can reduce scan time and generate images of similar quality to std-FLAIR in patients with white matter hyperintensities. Therefore, DLR-FLAIR may serve as an effective method in traditional magnetic resonance imaging protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":14691,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-024-01666-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate deep learning-reconstructed (DLR)-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images generated from undersampled data, compare them with fully sampled and rapidly acquired FLAIR images, and assess their potential for white matter hyperintensity evaluation.
Materials and methods: We examined 30 patients with white matter hyperintensities, obtaining fully sampled FLAIR images (standard FLAIR, std-FLAIR). We created accelerated FLAIR (acc-FLAIR) images using one-third of the fully sampled data and applied deep learning to generate DLR-FLAIR images. Three neuroradiologists assessed the quality (amount of noise and gray/white matter contrast) in all three image types. The reproducibility of hyperintensities was evaluated by comparing a subset of 100 hyperintensities in acc-FLAIR and DLR-FLAIR images with those in the std-FLAIR images. Quantitatively, similarities and errors of the entire image and the focused regions on white matter hyperintensities in acc-FLAIR and DLR-FLAIR images were measured against std-FLAIR images using structural similarity index measure (SSIM), regional SSIM, normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), and regional NRMSE values.
Results: All three neuroradiologists evaluated DLR-FLAIR as having significantly less noise and higher image quality scores compared with std-FLAIR and acc-FLAIR (p < 0.001). All three neuroradiologists assigned significantly higher frontal lobe gray/white matter visibility scores for DLR-FLAIR than for acc-FLAIR (p < 0.001); two neuroradiologists attributed significantly higher scores for DLR-FLAIR than for std-FLAIR (p < 0.05). Regarding white matter hyperintensities, all three neuroradiologists significantly preferred DLR-FLAIR (p < 0.0001). DLR-FLAIR exhibited higher similarity to std-FLAIR in terms of visibility of the hyperintensities, with 97% of the hyperintensities rated as nearly identical or equivalent. Quantitatively, DLR-FLAIR demonstrated significantly higher SSIM and regional SSIM values than acc-FLAIR, with significantly lower NRMSE and regional NRMSE values (p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: DLR-FLAIR can reduce scan time and generate images of similar quality to std-FLAIR in patients with white matter hyperintensities. Therefore, DLR-FLAIR may serve as an effective method in traditional magnetic resonance imaging protocols.
期刊介绍:
Japanese Journal of Radiology is a peer-reviewed journal, officially published by the Japan Radiological Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the field of radiology in medicine and biology. The scope of Japanese Journal of Radiology encompasses but is not restricted to diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, radiation physics, and radiation biology. Additionally, the journal covers technical and industrial innovations. The journal welcomes original articles, technical notes, review articles, pictorial essays and letters to the editor. The journal also provides announcements from the boards and the committees of the society. Membership in the Japan Radiological Society is not a prerequisite for submission. Contributions are welcomed from all parts of the world.