The role of cricoarytenoid joint ankylosis in bilateral vocal cord immobility.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Wan-Fu Su, Chi-Jen Chen, Yun-Chen Huang, Ying-Chieh Hsu, Po-Yun Ko, Shao-Cheng Liu
{"title":"The role of cricoarytenoid joint ankylosis in bilateral vocal cord immobility.","authors":"Wan-Fu Su, Chi-Jen Chen, Yun-Chen Huang, Ying-Chieh Hsu, Po-Yun Ko, Shao-Cheng Liu","doi":"10.1007/s00405-024-08988-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To stratify the severity of cricoarytenoid joint fixation (CAJF) by surgery and understand the role of it played in the bilateral vocal fold immobility (BVFI). The second objective emphasizes on the significance of the preoperative differential diagnosis from neurogenic immobility with medical history and endoscopic findings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted of 74 patients between 2005 and 2022. Careful medical history inquiry, and videolaryngoscopy are conducted to recruit the appropriate surgical candidates. All patients underwent arytenoid remobilization (AR) followed by vocal fold medialization with arytenoid adduction (AA) or lateralization with suture lateralization (SL). The severity of CAJF is graded during the operation or inferred based on the period from operation to recurrence.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 18 patients, aged between 18 and 76 years, were analyzed. Among them, 14 cases were classified as the adducted type with ventilation problems, with three presenting with dyspnea, and 11 requiring artificial airways. Additionally, four patients presented with the abducted type, characterized by aphonia. Meanwhile, two additional cases were considered for comparison but were not included in this cohort of 18 subjects due to incorrect diagnosis and inappropriate management. Using AR procedure, the AA procedure offered three aphonia subjects a voiced sound without airway impairment and the SL procedure decannulated 100% (11/11) of the artificial airways and improved the airway patency in 100% (3/3) of the non-tracheostomized subjects despite the severity of CAJF. The severity of joint ankylosis was distributed as follows: In the aphonia group, there were three subjects with grade I, one subject with grade II, and 0 subjects with grade III. In the ventilation group, there was one subject with grade I, seven subjects with grade II, and six subjects with grade III. In contrast, the two cases used for comparison experienced recurrent dyspnea and failed decannulation because the AR procedure was not performed. The follow-up period was averaged in 58 and 14 months at least.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>From this experience, it is the accurate preoperative diagnosis instead of the severity of CAJF that determines the successful rate in airway patency and voiced phonation if the AR procedure is utilized. Careful medical history inquiry and videolaryngoscopic examination can correctly differentiate the mechanical from neurogenic origin without the help of EMG. Evidence of level: 4.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08988-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To stratify the severity of cricoarytenoid joint fixation (CAJF) by surgery and understand the role of it played in the bilateral vocal fold immobility (BVFI). The second objective emphasizes on the significance of the preoperative differential diagnosis from neurogenic immobility with medical history and endoscopic findings.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 74 patients between 2005 and 2022. Careful medical history inquiry, and videolaryngoscopy are conducted to recruit the appropriate surgical candidates. All patients underwent arytenoid remobilization (AR) followed by vocal fold medialization with arytenoid adduction (AA) or lateralization with suture lateralization (SL). The severity of CAJF is graded during the operation or inferred based on the period from operation to recurrence.

Result: A total of 18 patients, aged between 18 and 76 years, were analyzed. Among them, 14 cases were classified as the adducted type with ventilation problems, with three presenting with dyspnea, and 11 requiring artificial airways. Additionally, four patients presented with the abducted type, characterized by aphonia. Meanwhile, two additional cases were considered for comparison but were not included in this cohort of 18 subjects due to incorrect diagnosis and inappropriate management. Using AR procedure, the AA procedure offered three aphonia subjects a voiced sound without airway impairment and the SL procedure decannulated 100% (11/11) of the artificial airways and improved the airway patency in 100% (3/3) of the non-tracheostomized subjects despite the severity of CAJF. The severity of joint ankylosis was distributed as follows: In the aphonia group, there were three subjects with grade I, one subject with grade II, and 0 subjects with grade III. In the ventilation group, there was one subject with grade I, seven subjects with grade II, and six subjects with grade III. In contrast, the two cases used for comparison experienced recurrent dyspnea and failed decannulation because the AR procedure was not performed. The follow-up period was averaged in 58 and 14 months at least.

Conclusion: From this experience, it is the accurate preoperative diagnosis instead of the severity of CAJF that determines the successful rate in airway patency and voiced phonation if the AR procedure is utilized. Careful medical history inquiry and videolaryngoscopic examination can correctly differentiate the mechanical from neurogenic origin without the help of EMG. Evidence of level: 4.

环杓关节强直在双侧声带活动障碍中的作用。
目的通过手术对环状腱膜关节固定术(CAJF)的严重程度进行分层,并了解其在双侧声带固定术(BVFI)中的作用。第二个目的是强调术前根据病史和内窥镜检查结果与神经源性声带不动进行鉴别诊断的重要性:方法:对 2005 年至 2022 年间的 74 例患者进行了回顾性研究。方法:对 2005 年至 2022 年间的 74 例患者进行回顾性研究,仔细询问病史并进行视频喉镜检查,以确定合适的手术人选。所有患者均接受了杓状肌再固定术(AR),随后进行了声带内侧化,杓状肌内收(AA)或缝合侧化(SL)。CAJF 的严重程度在手术过程中分级,或根据从手术到复发的时间推断:结果:共分析了 18 名患者,年龄在 18 岁至 76 岁之间。其中,14 例被归类为有通气问题的内收型,3 例出现呼吸困难,11 例需要人工气道。此外,4 名患者属于内收型,表现为失语。同时,还有两个病例被考虑用于比较,但由于诊断不正确和处理不当,这两个病例未被纳入本组的 18 名受试者中。使用 AR 程序,AA 程序为三名失声受试者提供了发声功能,且未造成气道损伤;SL 程序使 100%(11/11)的人工气道解禁,并改善了 100%(3/3)非气管造口受试者的气道通畅性,尽管 CAJF 的严重程度不同。关节强直的严重程度分布如下:在失声组中,3 名受试者为 I 级,1 名受试者为 II 级,0 名受试者为 III 级。通气组中,I 级 1 例,II 级 7 例,III 级 6 例。相比之下,用于对比的两个病例出现了反复呼吸困难,并因未进行 AR 程序而导致解禁失败。平均随访时间分别为 58 个月和至少 14 个月:结论:从本次经验来看,准确的术前诊断而非 CAJF 的严重程度决定了使用 AR 手术的气道通畅和语音发音的成功率。仔细询问病史和进行视频喉镜检查可以正确区分机械性和神经源性,而无需借助肌电图。证据等级:4。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信