Slurring silences

IF 1.3 1区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1111/phpr.13114

A. G. Holdier

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Silence can be a communicative act. Tanesini (2018) demonstrates how “eloquent” silences can virtuously indicate resistance and dissent; in this paper, I outline one way silence can also be used viciously to cause discursive harm, specifically by slurring victims. By distinguishing between eloquent and “signaling” silences (two kinds of what I call “performative” silences), I show how “slurring” silences — fully quiet discursive moves that signal one's commitment to a slurring perspective — function in a manner that illuminates the pragmatic topography of conversational silence in general.

查看原文本刊更多论文

口齿不清的沉默

沉默可以是一种交流行为。塔内西尼（Tanesini，2018 年）展示了 "雄辩的 "沉默如何能够善意地表示反抗和异议；在本文中，我概述了沉默也可以被恶毒地用来造成话语伤害的一种方式，特别是通过骚动受害者。通过区分雄辩式沉默和 "示意性 "沉默（我称之为 "表演性 "沉默的两种），我展示了 "辱骂性 "沉默--表明一个人致力于辱骂观点的完全安静的话语举动--是如何以一种照亮一般会话沉默的实用地形的方式发挥作用的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

3.50

自引率

6.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Philosophy and Phenomenological Research publishes articles in a wide range of areas including philosophy of mind, epistemology, ethics, metaphysics, and philosophical history of philosophy. No specific methodology or philosophical orientation is required for submissions.