Strategic Learning Strategies of Doctor of Physical Therapy Students.

Journal, physical therapy education Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1097/JTE.0000000000000345
Carrie A Minahan, Breanna Reynolds, Jennifer G Martin, Jill Seale
{"title":"Strategic Learning Strategies of Doctor of Physical Therapy Students.","authors":"Carrie A Minahan, Breanna Reynolds, Jennifer G Martin, Jill Seale","doi":"10.1097/JTE.0000000000000345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The use of strategic learning strategies has been positively associated with academic performance in several graduate health profession programs. This finding suggests that it may be an important construct to explore in Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) education. The Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) summarizes a student's perception and use of 10 learning and study strategies.</p><p><strong>Review of literature: </strong>Although the LASSI has limited reporting in DPT education, other health care education programs have shown correlation with academic performance. The purpose of this study was to examine DPT students' early perceptions of strategic learning with descriptive summaries of LASSI data and examine correlations between demographic and admissions-related data.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Matriculated DPT students ( n = 294) at a 2-year hybrid program who completed the LASSI at orientation in 2020 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a descriptive study that retrospectively analyzed LASSI scores in entry-level DPT students. LASSI score differences among demographic groups and Spearman's rho correlations between the LASSI, Graduate Record Examination (GRE) scores, grade point averages, grit, and emotional intelligence (EI) were explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LASSI score means were in the 50th-75th percentile (moderate category) suggesting a need for further development in strategic learning. Group differences in LASSI scores were noted for gender identity (male higher Anxiety management, P < .001; female higher Attitude , P < .001, Time Management , P = .003, and Use of Academic Resources , P = .003), racial-ethnic minoritized group (higher S elf-regulation , P = .013), first-generation college students (higher Attitude , P = .047), physical therapy assistants (higher Information Processing , P = .047), students with a primary language other than English (higher Time Management , P = .046), and older students (higher Anxiety management, P = .026). Weak but significant correlations were identified between LASSI scale and component scores and several admissions variables. Highest correlations were with grit ( Will , ρ = 0.319, P < .001; Concentration , ρ = 0.312, P < .001), EI ( Will , ρ = 0.328, P < .001; Attitude , ρ = 0.302, P < .001; Self-regulation , ρ = 0.382, P < .001; Use of Academic Resources ρ = 0.331, P < .001), and quantitative GRE scores ( Anxiety management, ρ = 0.341, P < .001).</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>All LASSI scale scores and components were in the moderate category, potentially indicating a need to coach and develop strategic learning strategies. Group differences in LASSI scores may represent varied student needs. The weak relationship between LASSI scores and admissions variables could suggest that the constructs measured by LASSI are not currently captured through typical DPT admissions practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":517432,"journal":{"name":"Journal, physical therapy education","volume":" ","pages":"311-321"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal, physical therapy education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTE.0000000000000345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The use of strategic learning strategies has been positively associated with academic performance in several graduate health profession programs. This finding suggests that it may be an important construct to explore in Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) education. The Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) summarizes a student's perception and use of 10 learning and study strategies.

Review of literature: Although the LASSI has limited reporting in DPT education, other health care education programs have shown correlation with academic performance. The purpose of this study was to examine DPT students' early perceptions of strategic learning with descriptive summaries of LASSI data and examine correlations between demographic and admissions-related data.

Subjects: Matriculated DPT students ( n = 294) at a 2-year hybrid program who completed the LASSI at orientation in 2020 and 2021.

Methods: This was a descriptive study that retrospectively analyzed LASSI scores in entry-level DPT students. LASSI score differences among demographic groups and Spearman's rho correlations between the LASSI, Graduate Record Examination (GRE) scores, grade point averages, grit, and emotional intelligence (EI) were explored.

Results: LASSI score means were in the 50th-75th percentile (moderate category) suggesting a need for further development in strategic learning. Group differences in LASSI scores were noted for gender identity (male higher Anxiety management, P < .001; female higher Attitude , P < .001, Time Management , P = .003, and Use of Academic Resources , P = .003), racial-ethnic minoritized group (higher S elf-regulation , P = .013), first-generation college students (higher Attitude , P = .047), physical therapy assistants (higher Information Processing , P = .047), students with a primary language other than English (higher Time Management , P = .046), and older students (higher Anxiety management, P = .026). Weak but significant correlations were identified between LASSI scale and component scores and several admissions variables. Highest correlations were with grit ( Will , ρ = 0.319, P < .001; Concentration , ρ = 0.312, P < .001), EI ( Will , ρ = 0.328, P < .001; Attitude , ρ = 0.302, P < .001; Self-regulation , ρ = 0.382, P < .001; Use of Academic Resources ρ = 0.331, P < .001), and quantitative GRE scores ( Anxiety management, ρ = 0.341, P < .001).

Discussion/conclusion: All LASSI scale scores and components were in the moderate category, potentially indicating a need to coach and develop strategic learning strategies. Group differences in LASSI scores may represent varied student needs. The weak relationship between LASSI scores and admissions variables could suggest that the constructs measured by LASSI are not currently captured through typical DPT admissions practices.

理疗学博士生的策略性学习策略。
导言:在一些健康专业研究生课程中,策略性学习策略的使用与学习成绩呈正相关。这一研究结果表明,在物理治疗学博士(DPT)教育中,这可能是一个需要探讨的重要问题。学习和学习策略量表(LASSI)总结了学生对 10 种学习和学习策略的认知和使用情况:尽管学习与学习策略量表在 DPT 教育中的报道有限,但其他医疗保健教育项目已显示出与学习成绩的相关性。本研究的目的是通过 LASSI 数据的描述性总结来考察 DPT 学生对策略性学习的早期认知,并考察人口统计学和入学相关数据之间的相关性:方法:这是一项回顾性的描述性研究:这是一项描述性研究,回顾性分析了 DPT 入门级学生的 LASSI 分数。研究探讨了不同人口统计学群体的 LASSI 分数差异,以及 LASSI、研究生入学考试(GRE)分数、平均学分绩点、勇气和情商(EI)之间的 Spearman's rho 相关性:LASSI 分数均值位于第 50-75 百分位数(中等水平),表明需要进一步发展策略性学习。LASSI 分数的群体差异表现在性别认同(男性焦虑管理较高,P < .001;女性态度较高,P < .001,时间管理较高,P = .003 ,学术资源利用较高,P = .003)、少数种族族裔群体(自我调节能力较高,P = .013)、第一代大学生(态度较高,P = .047)、物理治疗助理(信息处理较高,P = .047)、母语非英语的学生(时间管理较高,P = .046)和高年级学生(焦虑管理较高,P = .026)。LASSI 量表和成分得分与几个入学变量之间存在微弱但重要的相关性。相关性最高的是勇气(意志,ρ = 0.319,P < .001;专注力,ρ = 0.312,P < .001)、EI(意志,ρ = 0.328,P < .001;态度,ρ = 0.302,P < .001;自我调节,ρ = 0.382,P < .001;使用学术资源,ρ = 0.331,P < .001),以及定量 GRE 分数(焦虑管理,ρ = 0.341,P < .001):所有LASSI量表得分和成分都处于中等水平,这可能表明需要指导和制定战略性学习策略。LASSI 分数的群体差异可能代表了学生的不同需求。LASSI得分与录取变量之间的微弱关系可能表明,LASSI所衡量的建构目前并未通过典型的DPT录取实践得到体现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信