Analysis of care and gender stereotypes in nursing scientific research: a scoping review.

Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P Pub Date : 2024-09-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0066en

Gabriela Duarte Almeida Mundim, Maria Raquel Gomes Maia Pires, Maria Verônica Sousa Torres, Aline Oliveira Silveira

{"title":"Analysis of care and gender stereotypes in nursing scientific research: a scoping review.","authors":"Gabriela Duarte Almeida Mundim, Maria Raquel Gomes Maia Pires, Maria Verônica Sousa Torres, Aline Oliveira Silveira","doi":"10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0066en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To map evidence about care and gender stereotypes in nursing scientific research.Method: A scoping review developed under the JBI framework with analysis of gender perspective in care approaches. The searches were carried out on January 31, 2023 in SciELO, Scopus, CINAHL, PubMed, BDENF.Results: Of the 3,743 studies located, 25 were included. Evidence was grouped into categories: essentially female care (n = 9; 36%); calling and service of love (n = 3; 12%); erasure of gender inequalities (n = 2; 8%); \"inadequate and harmful\" care (n = 5; 20%); neutralization of gender and bodies (n = 3; 12%); and reporting oppression in care work (n = 3; 12%).Conclusion: Most scientific research on care reproduces gender stereotypes that reinforce the oppression of women in nursing. In contrast, resistance denounces naturalization of care as \"inadequate and harmful\", for perpetuating gender oppression in care work.","PeriodicalId":94195,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","volume":"58 ","pages":"e20240066"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11391781/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0066en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To map evidence about care and gender stereotypes in nursing scientific research.

Method: A scoping review developed under the JBI framework with analysis of gender perspective in care approaches. The searches were carried out on January 31, 2023 in SciELO, Scopus, CINAHL, PubMed, BDENF.

Results: Of the 3,743 studies located, 25 were included. Evidence was grouped into categories: essentially female care (n = 9; 36%); calling and service of love (n = 3; 12%); erasure of gender inequalities (n = 2; 8%); "inadequate and harmful" care (n = 5; 20%); neutralization of gender and bodies (n = 3; 12%); and reporting oppression in care work (n = 3; 12%).

Conclusion: Most scientific research on care reproduces gender stereotypes that reinforce the oppression of women in nursing. In contrast, resistance denounces naturalization of care as "inadequate and harmful", for perpetuating gender oppression in care work.

查看原文本刊更多论文

护理科学研究中的护理和性别陈规定型观念分析：范围界定综述。

目的绘制护理科学研究中有关护理和性别陈规定型观念的证据图：方法：在 JBI 框架下进行范围综述，分析护理方法中的性别观点。2023 年 1 月 31 日，在 SciELO、Scopus、CINAHL、PubMed 和 BDENF 中进行了检索：结果：在找到的 3,743 项研究中，有 25 项被纳入。结果：在找到的 3,743 项研究中，有 25 项被收录。证据被分为以下几类：基本上是女性护理（n = 9；36%）；爱的呼唤和服务（n = 3；12%）；消除性别不平等（n = 2；8%）；"不适当和有害的 "护理（n = 5；20%）；性别和身体的中性化（n = 3；12%）；报告护理工作中的压迫（n = 3；12%）：结论：大多数关于护理工作的科学研究都再现了性别陈规定型观念，这些观念强化了护理工作中对妇女的压迫。与此形成鲜明对比的是，抗争谴责护理归化 "不充分且有害"，因为它使护理工作中的性别压迫永久化。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P

自引率

0.00%

发文量