Robotic sentinel lymph node dissection experiences in endometrial cancer at our tertiary cancer treatment institution.

Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) Pub Date : 2024-09-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1806-9282.20240696
Erkan Şimşek, Sadık Gündüz, Özge Akdeniz Yıldız, Zinar Serhanoğlu, Levent Yaşar
{"title":"Robotic sentinel lymph node dissection experiences in endometrial cancer at our tertiary cancer treatment institution.","authors":"Erkan Şimşek, Sadık Gündüz, Özge Akdeniz Yıldız, Zinar Serhanoğlu, Levent Yaşar","doi":"10.1590/1806-9282.20240696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In endometrial cancer surgery, sentinel lymph node dissection is used instead of staging surgery, particularly in advanced disease that is limited to the uterus. The aim of this study is to evaluate our practice of robotic sentinel lymph node dissection, which is applied to endometrial cancer patients in our tertiary cancer treatment center, according to the current literature, and to share our own data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Included in our analysis are patients who underwent robotic sentinel lymph node dissection for endometrial cancer utilizing indocyanine green in our center between January 2018 and January 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, of the 93 endometrial carcinoma patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy, 63 were classified as low-risk, while 30 were high-risk according to the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. We found sentinel lymph nodes in both low-risk and high-risk patients, with an overall sensitivity of 96.32% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85.12-99.71), specificity of 100% (95%CI, 92.20-99.8), negative predictive value of 96.72% (95%CI, 87.03-99.89), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.06 (95%CI, 0.01-0.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After evaluating our data retrospectively, we determined that we were compatible with the current literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":94194,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11415064/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20240696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In endometrial cancer surgery, sentinel lymph node dissection is used instead of staging surgery, particularly in advanced disease that is limited to the uterus. The aim of this study is to evaluate our practice of robotic sentinel lymph node dissection, which is applied to endometrial cancer patients in our tertiary cancer treatment center, according to the current literature, and to share our own data.

Methods: Included in our analysis are patients who underwent robotic sentinel lymph node dissection for endometrial cancer utilizing indocyanine green in our center between January 2018 and January 2024.

Results: In all, of the 93 endometrial carcinoma patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy, 63 were classified as low-risk, while 30 were high-risk according to the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. We found sentinel lymph nodes in both low-risk and high-risk patients, with an overall sensitivity of 96.32% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85.12-99.71), specificity of 100% (95%CI, 92.20-99.8), negative predictive value of 96.72% (95%CI, 87.03-99.89), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.06 (95%CI, 0.01-0.36).

Conclusion: After evaluating our data retrospectively, we determined that we were compatible with the current literature.

我们的三级癌症治疗机构在子宫内膜癌方面的机器人前哨淋巴结清扫经验。
目的:在子宫内膜癌手术中,前哨淋巴结清扫术被用来代替分期手术,特别是对于局限于子宫的晚期疾病。本研究旨在根据现有文献,评估我们三级癌症治疗中心应用于子宫内膜癌患者的机器人前哨淋巴结清扫术,并分享我们自己的数据:我们的分析包括2018年1月至2024年1月期间在本中心利用吲哚菁绿接受机器人前哨淋巴结清扫术治疗子宫内膜癌的患者:根据欧洲妇科肿瘤学会和美国国立综合癌症网络指南,在接受前哨淋巴结活检的 93 例子宫内膜癌患者中,63 例被归类为低风险,30 例为高风险。我们在低危和高危患者中都发现了前哨淋巴结,总体敏感性为96.32%(95%置信区间[CI],85.12-99.71),特异性为100%(95%CI,92.20-99.8),阴性预测值为96.72%(95%CI,87.03-99.89),阴性似然比为0.06(95%CI,0.01-0.36):在对数据进行回顾性评估后,我们认为我们的数据与现有文献相符。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信