Delivery Room Handling of the Newborn: Filling the Gaps.

Neonatology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1159/000540079
Ola Didrik Saugstad, Vishal Kapadia, Maximo Vento
{"title":"Delivery Room Handling of the Newborn: Filling the Gaps.","authors":"Ola Didrik Saugstad, Vishal Kapadia, Maximo Vento","doi":"10.1159/000540079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Newborn resuscitation algorithms have since the turn of the century been more evidence-based. In this review, we discuss the development of American Heart Association (AHA) and the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR)'s algorithm for newborn resuscitation from 1992-2024. We have also aimed to identify the remaining gaps in non-evidenced practice.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Of the 22 procedures reviewed in the 2020 ILCOR recommendations, the evidence was either low, very low, or non-existing. The strength of recommendation is weak or non-existing for most topics discussed. Several knowledge gaps are also summarized. The special challenge for low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) is discussed.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>Newborn resuscitation is still not evidence-based, although great progress has been achieved the recent years. We have identified several knowledge gaps which should be prioritized in future research. The challenge of obtaining evidence-based knowledge from LMIC should be focused on in future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":94152,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":"553-561"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11446302/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Newborn resuscitation algorithms have since the turn of the century been more evidence-based. In this review, we discuss the development of American Heart Association (AHA) and the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR)'s algorithm for newborn resuscitation from 1992-2024. We have also aimed to identify the remaining gaps in non-evidenced practice.

Summary: Of the 22 procedures reviewed in the 2020 ILCOR recommendations, the evidence was either low, very low, or non-existing. The strength of recommendation is weak or non-existing for most topics discussed. Several knowledge gaps are also summarized. The special challenge for low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) is discussed.

Key messages: Newborn resuscitation is still not evidence-based, although great progress has been achieved the recent years. We have identified several knowledge gaps which should be prioritized in future research. The challenge of obtaining evidence-based knowledge from LMIC should be focused on in future research.

产房处理新生儿:填补空白。
背景:自本世纪初以来,新生儿复苏算法越来越多地以证据为基础。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了美国心脏协会(AHA)和国际复苏联络委员会(ILCOR)1992-2024 年间新生儿复苏算法的发展。摘要:在 2020 年 ILCOR 建议中审查的 22 个程序中,证据要么较少,要么非常少,要么不存在。对于所讨论的大多数主题,推荐强度为弱或不存在。此外,还总结了一些知识缺口。讨论了中低收入国家(LMIC)面临的特殊挑战:尽管近年来取得了巨大进步,但新生儿复苏仍不是以证据为基础的。我们发现了几个知识缺口,应在今后的研究中优先考虑。今后的研究应重点关注从低收入和中等收入国家获取循证知识的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信