Hu Yang, Ruiwen Shi, Yue Liu, Yilin Shi, Shengben Zhang, Jing Lan
{"title":"Analysis of factors affecting bone volume changes after immediate implantation in the maxillary central incisor.","authors":"Hu Yang, Ruiwen Shi, Yue Liu, Yilin Shi, Shengben Zhang, Jing Lan","doi":"10.7518/hxkq.2024.2024127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of immediate implantation of single maxillary central incisor and explore factors affecting post-implant bone volume.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data and imaging records from pre-surgery, the day of surgery, and 6 months post-surgery of 100 patients (100 implants) with non-salvageable maxillary central incisors who underwent immediate implantation were collected. Bone thickness at the cervical, middle, and apical regions of the implant's labial and palatal sides were measured immediately post-surgery and at 6 months, and bone volume changes were observed. A regression analysis model was used to assess predictive factors for labial and palatal bone plate thickness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 6 months post-surgery, the labial bone thicknesses at the cervical, middle, and apical regions were 2.35, 2.29, and 3.28 mm, respectively, and those of the palatal side were 0.00, 2.40, and 6.05 mm, respectively. The cervical region had the highest alveolar crest collapse rates, with 32.87% on the labial side and 62.20% on the palatal side. The regression model indicated that factors influencing the thickness of bone at the cervical labial side of the implant included initial bone thickness, the implant center to adjacent tooth center angle, implant diameter, and the type of implant closure (<i>P</i><0.05). The initial bone thickness on the palatal side was the sole predictor for bone thickness on the palatal side (<i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Immediate implantation of single maxillary central incisors yields effective clinical results. The thickness of new bone around the implant is influenced by multiple factors. A comprehensive consideration of these factors in the planning of immediate implantation is necessary to achieve optimal therapeutic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94028,"journal":{"name":"Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology","volume":"42 5","pages":"660-666"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11493867/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7518/hxkq.2024.2024127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of immediate implantation of single maxillary central incisor and explore factors affecting post-implant bone volume.
Methods: Clinical data and imaging records from pre-surgery, the day of surgery, and 6 months post-surgery of 100 patients (100 implants) with non-salvageable maxillary central incisors who underwent immediate implantation were collected. Bone thickness at the cervical, middle, and apical regions of the implant's labial and palatal sides were measured immediately post-surgery and at 6 months, and bone volume changes were observed. A regression analysis model was used to assess predictive factors for labial and palatal bone plate thickness.
Results: At 6 months post-surgery, the labial bone thicknesses at the cervical, middle, and apical regions were 2.35, 2.29, and 3.28 mm, respectively, and those of the palatal side were 0.00, 2.40, and 6.05 mm, respectively. The cervical region had the highest alveolar crest collapse rates, with 32.87% on the labial side and 62.20% on the palatal side. The regression model indicated that factors influencing the thickness of bone at the cervical labial side of the implant included initial bone thickness, the implant center to adjacent tooth center angle, implant diameter, and the type of implant closure (P<0.05). The initial bone thickness on the palatal side was the sole predictor for bone thickness on the palatal side (P<0.05).
Conclusions: Immediate implantation of single maxillary central incisors yields effective clinical results. The thickness of new bone around the implant is influenced by multiple factors. A comprehensive consideration of these factors in the planning of immediate implantation is necessary to achieve optimal therapeutic outcomes.