Editorial Commentary: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Selection Is Best Tailored to Individual Patient Sport and Activity Level

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Clayton W. Nuelle M.D. (Editorial Board)
{"title":"Editorial Commentary: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Selection Is Best Tailored to Individual Patient Sport and Activity Level","authors":"Clayton W. Nuelle M.D. (Editorial Board)","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.09.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction graft choice is a topic of ongoing debate. Literature shows allografts should be avoided in younger patients, and given this result, there has been a general trend toward increased use of autograft reconstruction in recent years, regardless of age. Almost concurrently, there has been an increased trend toward the use of quadriceps tendon as a primary or revision graft. In addition to these trends, more and more patients are remaining active at later ages, resulting in increased numbers of patients requiring ACL surgery at age 50 years and older. In this population, recent research shows equal outcomes with hamstring tendon and quadriceps tendon autografts, and lower return to skiing with hamstring grafts, indicating that graft choice should be tailored to the individual patient and their sport or activity level. Allografts (and any graft choice) may also show good outcomes in this age group.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 5","pages":"Pages 1521-1522"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806324007345","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction graft choice is a topic of ongoing debate. Literature shows allografts should be avoided in younger patients, and given this result, there has been a general trend toward increased use of autograft reconstruction in recent years, regardless of age. Almost concurrently, there has been an increased trend toward the use of quadriceps tendon as a primary or revision graft. In addition to these trends, more and more patients are remaining active at later ages, resulting in increased numbers of patients requiring ACL surgery at age 50 years and older. In this population, recent research shows equal outcomes with hamstring tendon and quadriceps tendon autografts, and lower return to skiing with hamstring grafts, indicating that graft choice should be tailored to the individual patient and their sport or activity level. Allografts (and any graft choice) may also show good outcomes in this age group.
前交叉韧带移植物的选择最好与患者的运动和活动水平相适应。
前交叉韧带重建的移植物选择一直是一个争论不休的话题。文献显示,年轻患者应避免使用同种异体移植物,鉴于这一结果,近年来无论年龄大小,使用自体移植物重建的趋势普遍增加。几乎与此同时,使用股四头肌腱(QT)作为初次或翻修移植物的趋势也在增加。除了这些趋势外,越来越多的患者在晚年仍保持运动能力,导致需要在晚年(大于 50 岁)进行前交叉韧带手术的患者人数增加。最近的研究显示,在这一人群中,腘绳肌腱和股四头肌腱自体移植物的疗效相当,而腘绳肌腱移植物恢复滑雪运动的效果较差(这表明,移植物的选择应根据患者个人及其运动或活动水平而定)。异体移植物(和任何移植物选择)在这一年龄组中也可显示出良好的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信