Knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding ChatGPT among health care professionals.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Yang Li, Zhongying Li
{"title":"Knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding ChatGPT among health care professionals.","authors":"Yang Li, Zhongying Li","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) in regard to ChatGPT among health care professionals (HCPs).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This web-based cross-sectional study included HCPs working at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University in China between August 2023 and September 2023. Participants unwilling to use ChatGPT were excluded. Correlations between KAP scores were evaluated by Pearson correlation analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 543 valid questionnaires were collected; of these, 231 questionnaires (42.54%) were completed by male HCPs. Mean (SD) knowledge, attitude, and practice scores were 6.71 (3.24) (range, 0-12), 21.27 (2.73) (range, 6-30), and 47.91 (8.17) (range, 12-60), respectively, indicating poor knowledge (55.92%), positive attitudes (70.90%), and proactive practices (79.85%). The knowledge scores were positively correlated with attitude (Pearson r = 0.216; P < .001) and practice (Pearson r = 0.283; P < .001) scores, and the attitude scores were positively correlated with practice scores (Pearson r = 0.479; P < .001). SEM showed that knowledge influenced attitude positively (β = 0.498; P < .001) but negatively influenced practice part 1 (improving work efficiency and patient experience) (β = -0.301; P < .001), practice part 2 (helping advance medical research) (β = -0.436; P < .001), practice part 3 (assisting HCPs) (β = -0.338; P  < .001), and practice part 4 (the possibilities) (β = -0.242; P < .001). Attitude positively influenced practice part 1 (β = 1.430; P  < .001), practice part 2 (β = 1.581; P < .001), practice part 3 (β = 1.513; P < .001), and practice part 4 (β = 1.387; P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HCPs willing to use ChatGPT in China showed poor knowledge, positive attitudes, and proactive practices regarding ChatGPT.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89604","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) in regard to ChatGPT among health care professionals (HCPs).

Study design: Cross-sectional study.

Methods: This web-based cross-sectional study included HCPs working at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University in China between August 2023 and September 2023. Participants unwilling to use ChatGPT were excluded. Correlations between KAP scores were evaluated by Pearson correlation analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM).

Results: A total of 543 valid questionnaires were collected; of these, 231 questionnaires (42.54%) were completed by male HCPs. Mean (SD) knowledge, attitude, and practice scores were 6.71 (3.24) (range, 0-12), 21.27 (2.73) (range, 6-30), and 47.91 (8.17) (range, 12-60), respectively, indicating poor knowledge (55.92%), positive attitudes (70.90%), and proactive practices (79.85%). The knowledge scores were positively correlated with attitude (Pearson r = 0.216; P < .001) and practice (Pearson r = 0.283; P < .001) scores, and the attitude scores were positively correlated with practice scores (Pearson r = 0.479; P < .001). SEM showed that knowledge influenced attitude positively (β = 0.498; P < .001) but negatively influenced practice part 1 (improving work efficiency and patient experience) (β = -0.301; P < .001), practice part 2 (helping advance medical research) (β = -0.436; P < .001), practice part 3 (assisting HCPs) (β = -0.338; P  < .001), and practice part 4 (the possibilities) (β = -0.242; P < .001). Attitude positively influenced practice part 1 (β = 1.430; P  < .001), practice part 2 (β = 1.581; P < .001), practice part 3 (β = 1.513; P < .001), and practice part 4 (β = 1.387; P < .001).

Conclusion: HCPs willing to use ChatGPT in China showed poor knowledge, positive attitudes, and proactive practices regarding ChatGPT.

医护人员对 ChatGPT 的认识、态度和做法。
研究目的研究设计:横断面研究:研究设计:横断面研究:这项基于网络的横断面研究纳入了 2023 年 8 月至 2023 年 9 月期间在中国安徽医科大学第一附属医院工作的医护人员。排除了不愿意使用 ChatGPT 的参与者。通过皮尔逊相关分析和结构方程模型(SEM)评估了KAP评分之间的相关性:共收集到 543 份有效问卷,其中 231 份(42.54%)由男性保健医生填写。知识、态度和实践得分的平均值(标清)分别为 6.71 (3.24)(范围,0-12)、21.27 (2.73)(范围,6-30)和 47.91 (8.17)(范围,12-60),表明知识贫乏(55.92%)、态度积极(70.90%)和实践主动(79.85%)。知识得分与态度呈正相关(Pearson r = 0.216;P 结论:知识得分与态度得分呈正相关(Pearson r = 0.216;P 结论:知识得分与态度得分呈正相关:在中国,愿意使用 ChatGPT 的 HCPs 对 ChatGPT 的认知度较低,态度积极,实践主动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信