[The consistency between changes in Mandarin Tinnitus Questionnaire scores and tinnitus treatment outcomes].

Q3 Medicine
C Diao, Q Wang, Y Zhao, Z L Meng
{"title":"[The consistency between changes in Mandarin Tinnitus Questionnaire scores and tinnitus treatment outcomes].","authors":"C Diao, Q Wang, Y Zhao, Z L Meng","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240220-00356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To verify the consistency between changes in Mandarin Tinnitus Questionnaire (MTQ) scores and tinnitus treatment outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> Tinnitus patients attending the Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University from September 2020 to September 2021were prospectively enrolled. The tinnitus severity was evaluated by the doctor's assessment, the patient's self-assessment, the MTQ, and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Follow-up assessments were conducted 3 to 6 months later to evaluate the severity of tinnitus post-treatment, and information on the interventions received (pharmacologic/non-pharmacologic) and patients' self-reported clinical impressions of their treatment outcomes (tinnitus cured/improved/no change/exacerbated) was collected. <b>Results:</b> A total of 54 tinnitus patients aged (43.5±12.7) years were included, consisting of 16 males and 38 females. There were 38 cases in the medication group and 16 cases in the non-medication group. No statistically significant differences in baseline clinical data were observed (all <i>P</i>>0.05). The proportion of primary tinnitus in the medication group was higher than that in the non-medication group [97.4% (37/38) vs 75.0% (12/16), <i>P</i>=0.023]. The correlation coefficients of MTQ scores at the initial and follow-up visits with doctor's assessment, patient's self-assessment, and VAS scores were 0.679, 0.483, 0.606, 0.774, 0.779, and 0.756, respectively (all <i>P</i><0.001). The ΔMTQ correlation coefficient with ΔVAS was 0.694 (<i>P</i><0.001), with a mean difference of 3.704×10<sup>-7</sup> and 95% limits of agreement ranging from -1.534 to 1.534 in Bland-Altman analysis. There were no statistically significant differences of ΔVAS and ΔMTQ between two groups (both <i>P</i>>0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> MTQ correlates well with the doctor's assessment, the patient's self-assessment, and VAS. Changes in MTQ scores associate well with changes in VAS scores. Additionally, changes in MTQ scores are consistent with the effect of tinnitus treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":24023,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi","volume":"104 36","pages":"3386-3391"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240220-00356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To verify the consistency between changes in Mandarin Tinnitus Questionnaire (MTQ) scores and tinnitus treatment outcomes. Methods: Tinnitus patients attending the Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University from September 2020 to September 2021were prospectively enrolled. The tinnitus severity was evaluated by the doctor's assessment, the patient's self-assessment, the MTQ, and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Follow-up assessments were conducted 3 to 6 months later to evaluate the severity of tinnitus post-treatment, and information on the interventions received (pharmacologic/non-pharmacologic) and patients' self-reported clinical impressions of their treatment outcomes (tinnitus cured/improved/no change/exacerbated) was collected. Results: A total of 54 tinnitus patients aged (43.5±12.7) years were included, consisting of 16 males and 38 females. There were 38 cases in the medication group and 16 cases in the non-medication group. No statistically significant differences in baseline clinical data were observed (all P>0.05). The proportion of primary tinnitus in the medication group was higher than that in the non-medication group [97.4% (37/38) vs 75.0% (12/16), P=0.023]. The correlation coefficients of MTQ scores at the initial and follow-up visits with doctor's assessment, patient's self-assessment, and VAS scores were 0.679, 0.483, 0.606, 0.774, 0.779, and 0.756, respectively (all P<0.001). The ΔMTQ correlation coefficient with ΔVAS was 0.694 (P<0.001), with a mean difference of 3.704×10-7 and 95% limits of agreement ranging from -1.534 to 1.534 in Bland-Altman analysis. There were no statistically significant differences of ΔVAS and ΔMTQ between two groups (both P>0.05). Conclusions: MTQ correlates well with the doctor's assessment, the patient's self-assessment, and VAS. Changes in MTQ scores associate well with changes in VAS scores. Additionally, changes in MTQ scores are consistent with the effect of tinnitus treatment.

[普通话耳鸣问卷评分变化与耳鸣治疗效果的一致性]。
目的验证普通话耳鸣问卷(MTQ)得分变化与耳鸣治疗效果之间的一致性。方法: 在耳鼻咽喉科就诊的耳鸣患者前瞻性纳入 2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 9 月在四川大学华西医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科就诊的耳鸣患者。耳鸣严重程度通过医生评估、患者自评、MTQ和视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行评估。3至6个月后进行随访评估,以评价治疗后耳鸣的严重程度,并收集所接受的干预措施(药物/非药物)和患者对治疗结果(耳鸣治愈/改善/无变化/加剧)的临床自我报告。结果:共纳入 54 名耳鸣患者,年龄(43.5±12.7)岁,其中男性 16 名,女性 38 名。药物治疗组 38 例,非药物治疗组 16 例。基线临床数据差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。药物治疗组的原发性耳鸣比例高于非药物治疗组[97.4% (37/38) vs 75.0% (12/16),P=0.023]。初诊和复诊时的 MTQ 评分与医生评估、患者自评和 VAS 评分的相关系数分别为 0.679、0.483、0.606、0.774、0.779 和 0.756(均为 PP-7,布兰德-阿尔特曼分析的 95% 一致度范围为-1.534 至 1.534)。两组间的ΔVAS和ΔMTQ差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。结论MTQ 与医生的评估、患者的自我评估和 VAS 都有很好的相关性。MTQ 分数的变化与 VAS 分数的变化密切相关。此外,MTQ 分数的变化与耳鸣治疗效果一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
400
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信