[Comparison of horizontal plane auditory spatial discrimination abilities and testing methods in patients with symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss].

Q4 Medicine
L Wei, J Y Li, X Wang, X L He, S Nie, X Fu, H Li, J X Liu, X L Zhao, Z H Zhao, N Y Wang, J Zhang
{"title":"[Comparison of horizontal plane auditory spatial discrimination abilities and testing methods in patients with symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss].","authors":"L Wei, J Y Li, X Wang, X L He, S Nie, X Fu, H Li, J X Liu, X L Zhao, Z H Zhao, N Y Wang, J Zhang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20231115-00215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To evaluate auditory spatial discrimination capabilities in patients with mild to moderately severe symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and to compare the impact of different psychophysical testing methods on Minimum Audible Angle (MAA) and test duration. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 105 symmetrical SNHL patients aged from 18 to 60 years old were enrolled from April to July 2023, including 56 males and 49 females. They were divided into three groups based on PTA: mild, moderate, and moderately severe hearing loss, with 35 individuals in each group. Additionally, a control group of 35 individuals with normal hearing was tested, including 18 males and 17 females. Participants underwent four distinct psychophysical discrimination tests: the block up-down, 1-up/1-down, 1-up/2-down, and 1-up/3-down procedures. We recorded the MAA and test duration for each. We employed repeated measures of ANOVA to compare the MAA and test duration across different methods and groups, and Pearson's correlation to assess the relationship between MAA and degree of hearing loss. <b>Results:</b> MAA of sound localization in patients with symmetrical SNHL was significantly positively correlated with the degree of hearing loss (<i>r</i>=0.59, <i>P</i><0.01). Significant deterioration in MAA was observed as hearing loss progressed to the moderate level (PTA≥35 dBHL, <i>P</i><0.01). The testing methods significantly influenced MAA and testing duration (<i>F</i>=24.02, <i>P</i><0.01; <i>F</i>=75.56, <i>P</i><0.01) and the 1-up/1-down method was the quickest, averaging only (0.69±0.32) mins. <b>Conclusions:</b> The horizontal plane auditory spatial discrimination abilities in patients with symmetrical SNHL is impaired progressively with increasing hearing loss, notably beyond moderate hearing loss levels. Different psychophysical methods influence both MAA and test duration, the quicker 1-up/1-down method is recommended for assessing MAA in symmetrical SNHL patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23987,"journal":{"name":"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery","volume":"59 9","pages":"922-927"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20231115-00215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate auditory spatial discrimination capabilities in patients with mild to moderately severe symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and to compare the impact of different psychophysical testing methods on Minimum Audible Angle (MAA) and test duration. Methods: A total of 105 symmetrical SNHL patients aged from 18 to 60 years old were enrolled from April to July 2023, including 56 males and 49 females. They were divided into three groups based on PTA: mild, moderate, and moderately severe hearing loss, with 35 individuals in each group. Additionally, a control group of 35 individuals with normal hearing was tested, including 18 males and 17 females. Participants underwent four distinct psychophysical discrimination tests: the block up-down, 1-up/1-down, 1-up/2-down, and 1-up/3-down procedures. We recorded the MAA and test duration for each. We employed repeated measures of ANOVA to compare the MAA and test duration across different methods and groups, and Pearson's correlation to assess the relationship between MAA and degree of hearing loss. Results: MAA of sound localization in patients with symmetrical SNHL was significantly positively correlated with the degree of hearing loss (r=0.59, P<0.01). Significant deterioration in MAA was observed as hearing loss progressed to the moderate level (PTA≥35 dBHL, P<0.01). The testing methods significantly influenced MAA and testing duration (F=24.02, P<0.01; F=75.56, P<0.01) and the 1-up/1-down method was the quickest, averaging only (0.69±0.32) mins. Conclusions: The horizontal plane auditory spatial discrimination abilities in patients with symmetrical SNHL is impaired progressively with increasing hearing loss, notably beyond moderate hearing loss levels. Different psychophysical methods influence both MAA and test duration, the quicker 1-up/1-down method is recommended for assessing MAA in symmetrical SNHL patients.

[对称性感音神经性听力损失患者水平面听觉空间分辨能力和测试方法的比较]。
目的评估轻度至中度重度对称性感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)患者的听觉空间分辨能力,并比较不同心理物理测试方法对最小可闻角度(MAA)和测试持续时间的影响。测试方法2023 年 4 月至 7 月,共招募了 105 名年龄在 18 至 60 岁之间的对称性感音神经性听力损失患者,其中包括 56 名男性和 49 名女性。根据 PTA 将他们分为三组:轻度、中度和中重度听力损失,每组 35 人。此外,还对听力正常的 35 名对照组人员进行了测试,其中包括 18 名男性和 17 名女性。受试者接受了四种不同的心理物理辨别测试:块状上-下、1-上/1-下、1-上/2-下和 1-上/3-下程序。我们记录了每项测试的 MAA 和测试持续时间。我们采用重复测量方差分析来比较不同方法和组别的 MAA 和测试持续时间,并采用皮尔逊相关性来评估 MAA 与听力损失程度之间的关系。结果对称性 SNHL 患者声音定位的 MAA 与听力损失程度呈显著正相关(r=0.59,PPF=24.02,PF=75.56,PConclusions):对称性SNHL患者的水平面听觉空间分辨能力会随着听力损失程度的增加而逐渐受损,中度听力损失程度以上的患者尤为明显。不同的心理物理方法会影响听觉空间分辨能力和测试持续时间,建议采用更快的1-up/1-down方法来评估对称性SNHL患者的听觉空间分辨能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12432
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信