Prognostic value of the postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level in colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
World Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1002/wjs.12349
Furui Liu, Shuai Jiang, Jianli Cui, Yueqiao Wu, Shuhui Chen, Zhan Yu
{"title":"Prognostic value of the postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level in colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.","authors":"Furui Liu, Shuai Jiang, Jianli Cui, Yueqiao Wu, Shuhui Chen, Zhan Yu","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is one of the commonly used preoperative biomarkers for colorectal cancer (CRC), but no meta-analysis has evaluated the findings of all recently published studies to determine whether its postoperative level can serve as a prognostic indicator.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search for eligible literature from the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases in October 2023. Studies that investigated the relationship between postoperative serum CEA levels and prognosis in CRC patients were included. Outcome indicators, including overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and progression-free survival (PFS)/recurrence-free survival (RFS), were analyzed using a fixed-effects or random-effects model. The pooled hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as effective values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis included 20 eligible studies involving 10,114 CRC patients from the East Asian and Western countries. A comprehensive analysis revealed that elevated postoperative CEA levels were associated with low OS (HR: 2.92, 95% CI: 2.36-3.62, and p < 0.000), DFS (HR: 2.81, 95% CI: 2.01-3.94, and p < 0.000), and RFS/PFS (HR: 2.52, 95% CI: 1.75-3.62, p < 0.000). A subgroup analysis by region, analysis type, distant metastasis, HR obtain method, sample size, postoperative measurement date, and study design demonstrated that the negative correlation observed between high serum CEA levels after surgery and poor prognosis was not significantly different between the subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When CEA levels are found to be elevated during postoperative follow-up, more active intervention measures should be implemented to further improve the patient's survival outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2359-2375"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12349","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is one of the commonly used preoperative biomarkers for colorectal cancer (CRC), but no meta-analysis has evaluated the findings of all recently published studies to determine whether its postoperative level can serve as a prognostic indicator.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search for eligible literature from the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases in October 2023. Studies that investigated the relationship between postoperative serum CEA levels and prognosis in CRC patients were included. Outcome indicators, including overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and progression-free survival (PFS)/recurrence-free survival (RFS), were analyzed using a fixed-effects or random-effects model. The pooled hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as effective values.

Results: This meta-analysis included 20 eligible studies involving 10,114 CRC patients from the East Asian and Western countries. A comprehensive analysis revealed that elevated postoperative CEA levels were associated with low OS (HR: 2.92, 95% CI: 2.36-3.62, and p < 0.000), DFS (HR: 2.81, 95% CI: 2.01-3.94, and p < 0.000), and RFS/PFS (HR: 2.52, 95% CI: 1.75-3.62, p < 0.000). A subgroup analysis by region, analysis type, distant metastasis, HR obtain method, sample size, postoperative measurement date, and study design demonstrated that the negative correlation observed between high serum CEA levels after surgery and poor prognosis was not significantly different between the subgroups.

Conclusion: When CEA levels are found to be elevated during postoperative follow-up, more active intervention measures should be implemented to further improve the patient's survival outcomes.

结直肠癌术后癌胚抗原水平的预后价值:荟萃分析。
背景:癌胚抗原(CEA)是结直肠癌(CRC)术前常用的生物标志物之一,但目前还没有一项荟萃分析对近期发表的所有研究结果进行评估,以确定其术后水平是否可作为预后指标:我们于 2023 年 10 月在 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Web of Science 数据库中对符合条件的文献进行了系统检索。方法:我们于 2023 年 10 月在 PubMase、EMBASE 和 Web Science 数据库中对符合条件的文献进行了系统检索,纳入了调查 CRC 患者术后血清 CEA 水平与预后关系的研究。结果指标包括总生存期(OS)、无病生存期(DFS)和无进展生存期(PFS)/无复发生存期(RFS),采用固定效应或随机效应模型进行分析。汇总的危险比(HR)及95%置信区间(CI)作为有效值:该荟萃分析包括20项符合条件的研究,涉及来自东亚和西方国家的10114名CRC患者。综合分析显示,术后 CEA 水平升高与低 OS 相关(HR:2.92,95% CI:2.36-3.62,P 结论:CEA 水平升高与低 OS 相关:如果在术后随访中发现 CEA 水平升高,应采取更积极的干预措施,以进一步改善患者的生存预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Surgery
World Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
460
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信