Introducing a New Severity Specifier for Schizophrenia: Conceptual Framework and Clinical Implications.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Ary Gadelha, Renan M Biokino, Pedro Lorencetti, Nicolas A Crossley, Daniela Bordini, Raffael Massuda
{"title":"Introducing a New Severity Specifier for Schizophrenia: Conceptual Framework and Clinical Implications.","authors":"Ary Gadelha, Renan M Biokino, Pedro Lorencetti, Nicolas A Crossley, Daniela Bordini, Raffael Massuda","doi":"10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Schizophrenia patients represent a heterogeneous group in clinical presentation and severity. Although severity has been operationalized in different ways, mostly on a gradient between symptom severity and functional impairment, such approaches are limited in capturing real-world functioning. We suggest adopting the severity model proposed by DSM-5 for autism spectrum disorders. The model defines three levels of severity, based on the support required, directly addressing two barriers from previous models: real-world functioning and ease of implementation. Our adapted model includes three new features: First, this severity specifier is global, rather than for each symptom domain. Second, the centrality of occupational functioning is emphasized to define the level of support. Third, we propose a one-month timeframe for severity appraisal, standardizing the assessment process. Considering practical utility, we indicate how severity assessment can guide clinical practice towards rehabilitation. Additionally, we outlined operational definitions for severity and functioning in schizophrenia, aligned with the premises of our model. Finally, we acknowledge potential limitations, the most relevant being the need for empirical validation. The model is presented to foster discussion. Additional studies will follow to investigate inter-rater reliability and convergent validation with standard measures of symptom and functioning severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":21244,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47626/1516-4446-2024-3722","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Schizophrenia patients represent a heterogeneous group in clinical presentation and severity. Although severity has been operationalized in different ways, mostly on a gradient between symptom severity and functional impairment, such approaches are limited in capturing real-world functioning. We suggest adopting the severity model proposed by DSM-5 for autism spectrum disorders. The model defines three levels of severity, based on the support required, directly addressing two barriers from previous models: real-world functioning and ease of implementation. Our adapted model includes three new features: First, this severity specifier is global, rather than for each symptom domain. Second, the centrality of occupational functioning is emphasized to define the level of support. Third, we propose a one-month timeframe for severity appraisal, standardizing the assessment process. Considering practical utility, we indicate how severity assessment can guide clinical practice towards rehabilitation. Additionally, we outlined operational definitions for severity and functioning in schizophrenia, aligned with the premises of our model. Finally, we acknowledge potential limitations, the most relevant being the need for empirical validation. The model is presented to foster discussion. Additional studies will follow to investigate inter-rater reliability and convergent validation with standard measures of symptom and functioning severity.

引入精神分裂症的新严重程度指标:概念框架和临床意义。
精神分裂症患者的临床表现和严重程度各不相同。虽然严重程度有不同的操作方法,主要是症状严重程度和功能障碍之间的梯度,但这些方法在捕捉现实世界的功能方面是有限的。我们建议采用 DSM-5 提出的自闭症谱系障碍严重程度模型。该模型根据所需的支持定义了三个严重程度,直接解决了以往模型的两个障碍:现实世界的功能和实施的难易程度。我们调整后的模型有三个新特点:首先,这种严重程度规格是全球性的,而不是针对每个症状领域。第二,强调职业功能的中心地位,以确定支持的程度。第三,我们提出了一个月的严重程度评估时限,使评估过程标准化。考虑到实用性,我们指出了严重程度评估如何指导临床康复实践。此外,我们还概述了精神分裂症严重程度和功能的操作定义,这与我们模型的前提相一致。最后,我们承认可能存在的局限性,其中最重要的是需要经验验证。本模型的提出旨在促进讨论。接下来我们还将进行更多的研究,以调查评分者之间的可靠性以及与症状和功能严重程度标准测量方法的趋同验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria
Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria (RBP) is the official organ of the Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP - Brazilian Association of Psychiatry). The Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry is a bimonthly publication that aims to publish original manuscripts in all areas of psychiatry, including public health, clinical epidemiology, basic science, and mental health problems. The journal is fully open access, and there are no article processing or publication fees. Articles must be written in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信