Patients' experience of telehealth clinics during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Faten A AlRadini, Maha Abdulrahim, Naif AlOtaibi, Fahad A Al Amri, Samar Ahmed Amer
{"title":"Patients' experience of telehealth clinics during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional study.","authors":"Faten A AlRadini, Maha Abdulrahim, Naif AlOtaibi, Fahad A Al Amri, Samar Ahmed Amer","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000039837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Globally, the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic in 2019 has accelerated the adoption of telehealth technologies. The implementation of the Saudi Telemedicine Network (STN) and other digital health initiatives, such as the telehealth clinic (THC) at King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAAUH), exemplifies this trend in Saudi Arabia. The aim of this study was to explore the patients' experience of THC in KAAUH during the COVID-19 pandemic and their' beliefs about their readiness to replace the traditional onsite clinical visits with THC from March to September 2020. A cross-sectional study targeted all 1398 patients who utilized THC at KAAUH. A self-administrated, validated survey collected the data. The survey used a Likert scale and included questions on satisfaction with THC services and the perceived effectiveness of telehealth as a substitute for in-person visits. The collected data was analyzed using frequency and percentage. A total of 252 patients responded to the THC postvisit survey. Overall, 217 patients (86%) were satisfied, 32 patients (13%) were dissatisfied, and only 3 patients (1%) were neutral about THC. Most patients (65.5%) agree that THC provided enough information about their health conditions, which can substitute for clinical visits. About 18.3% of patients were neutral, while 16.3% disagreed with the effectiveness of THC services and believed that they could not replace onsite visits. During the COVID-19 pandemic, most patients were satisfied at KAAUH-THC in Saudi Arabia and believed that it could replace the onsite visit to a physician's clinic. The 2 main causes of the patient's belief that THC could not replace an onsite clinical visit were: First, nonadherence to appointments led to missed calls and a complete medical service. Second, the patient's perception is that a physical examination and lab investigation cannot be completed through THC.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000039837","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globally, the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic in 2019 has accelerated the adoption of telehealth technologies. The implementation of the Saudi Telemedicine Network (STN) and other digital health initiatives, such as the telehealth clinic (THC) at King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAAUH), exemplifies this trend in Saudi Arabia. The aim of this study was to explore the patients' experience of THC in KAAUH during the COVID-19 pandemic and their' beliefs about their readiness to replace the traditional onsite clinical visits with THC from March to September 2020. A cross-sectional study targeted all 1398 patients who utilized THC at KAAUH. A self-administrated, validated survey collected the data. The survey used a Likert scale and included questions on satisfaction with THC services and the perceived effectiveness of telehealth as a substitute for in-person visits. The collected data was analyzed using frequency and percentage. A total of 252 patients responded to the THC postvisit survey. Overall, 217 patients (86%) were satisfied, 32 patients (13%) were dissatisfied, and only 3 patients (1%) were neutral about THC. Most patients (65.5%) agree that THC provided enough information about their health conditions, which can substitute for clinical visits. About 18.3% of patients were neutral, while 16.3% disagreed with the effectiveness of THC services and believed that they could not replace onsite visits. During the COVID-19 pandemic, most patients were satisfied at KAAUH-THC in Saudi Arabia and believed that it could replace the onsite visit to a physician's clinic. The 2 main causes of the patient's belief that THC could not replace an onsite clinical visit were: First, nonadherence to appointments led to missed calls and a complete medical service. Second, the patient's perception is that a physical examination and lab investigation cannot be completed through THC.

在 COVID-19 大流行期间患者对远程医疗诊所的体验:横断面研究。
在全球范围内,2019 年流行的冠状病毒疾病(COVID-19)加速了远程医疗技术的采用。沙特阿拉伯远程医疗网络(STN)和其他数字医疗举措的实施,如阿卜杜拉-本-阿卜杜勒-阿齐兹国王大学医院(KAAUH)的远程医疗诊所(THC),体现了沙特阿拉伯的这一趋势。本研究旨在探讨 KAAUH 的患者在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用 THC 的体验,以及他们是否愿意在 2020 年 3 月至 9 月期间用 THC 取代传统的现场临床就诊。这项横断面研究的对象是在高大医院使用过 THC 的所有 1398 名患者。研究人员通过自我管理的有效调查收集数据。调查采用李克特量表,内容包括对 THC 服务的满意度,以及对远程医疗替代现场就诊效果的看法。收集到的数据使用频率和百分比进行分析。共有 252 名患者回复了 THC 诊后调查。总体而言,217 名患者(86%)对 THC 表示满意,32 名患者(13%)表示不满意,只有 3 名患者(1%)对 THC 持中立态度。大多数患者(65.5%)认为 THC 提供了有关其健康状况的足够信息,可以替代临床就诊。约 18.3%的病人持中立态度,16.3%的病人不同意 THC 服务的有效性,并认为 THC 服务不能取代现场就诊。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,大多数患者对沙特阿拉伯的 KAAUH-THC 感到满意,认为它可以取代医生诊所的现场就诊。导致患者认为 THC 无法取代现场门诊的两个主要原因是:首先,不遵守预约导致错过电话和完整的医疗服务。第二,患者认为 THC 无法完成体格检查和实验室检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信