Usefulness of the Upright Posture Test in the Diagnosis of Primary Aldosteronism.

IF 3 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Journal of the Endocrine Society Pub Date : 2024-09-04 eCollection Date: 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1210/jendso/bvae155
Nada Younes, Matthieu St-Jean, Marie-Josée Desrochers, Eric Therasse, Mathieu Latour, Isabelle Bourdeau, André Lacroix
{"title":"Usefulness of the Upright Posture Test in the Diagnosis of Primary Aldosteronism.","authors":"Nada Younes, Matthieu St-Jean, Marie-Josée Desrochers, Eric Therasse, Mathieu Latour, Isabelle Bourdeau, André Lacroix","doi":"10.1210/jendso/bvae155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the usefulness of the upright posture stimulation test (UPT) in the confirmation of primary aldosteronism (PA) in patients in whom saline tests (ST) were inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred eighty-seven adult patients with possible PA were retrospectively included and compared to 25 control subjects. Blood samples were obtained after a 1-hour supine posture and during 2 hours of ambulation. An increase in plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) ≥ 50% with a suppressed renin (≤10.1 ng/L; ≤1 ng/mL/hour) and a cortisol increase ≤50% were considered abnormal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PA patients had higher basal PAC and lower basal direct renin concentration (DRC) (<i>P</i> < .0001) and a higher maximal PAC (<i>P</i> = .0025) and lower maximal DRC (DRC<sub>max</sub>) (<i>P</i> < .0001) during UPT compared to controls. PA was confirmed in 145 patients (77.5%), based on either oral/IV ST or UPT. DRC<sub>max</sub> ≤12 ng/L during UPT was a predictor of PA (receiver operating characteristic curve sensitivity 93.8%, specificity 88%), and 95.6% of PA patients increased PAC ≥50% on UPT (median 222.2%), while renin remained suppressed. All 41 PA patients with false-negative IV ST (PAC < 162 pmol/L) and 88.9% with borderline response (162-240 pmol/L) had a DRC<sub>max</sub> ≤12, while, respectively, 97.6% and 100% increased aldosterone by ≥50%. Similar responses to UPT were found in lateralized (28/63) and bilateral PA source (35/63). PA diagnosis increased from 23.6% to 88.8% using UPT results instead of IV ST and were confirmed at pathology and clinical outcome after adrenalectomy (n = 22).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>UPT can be useful to confirm PA, particularly in patients with suspected false-negative ST.</p>","PeriodicalId":17334,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Endocrine Society","volume":"8 10","pages":"bvae155"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11411212/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Endocrine Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvae155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the usefulness of the upright posture stimulation test (UPT) in the confirmation of primary aldosteronism (PA) in patients in whom saline tests (ST) were inconclusive.

Methods: One hundred eighty-seven adult patients with possible PA were retrospectively included and compared to 25 control subjects. Blood samples were obtained after a 1-hour supine posture and during 2 hours of ambulation. An increase in plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) ≥ 50% with a suppressed renin (≤10.1 ng/L; ≤1 ng/mL/hour) and a cortisol increase ≤50% were considered abnormal.

Results: PA patients had higher basal PAC and lower basal direct renin concentration (DRC) (P < .0001) and a higher maximal PAC (P = .0025) and lower maximal DRC (DRCmax) (P < .0001) during UPT compared to controls. PA was confirmed in 145 patients (77.5%), based on either oral/IV ST or UPT. DRCmax ≤12 ng/L during UPT was a predictor of PA (receiver operating characteristic curve sensitivity 93.8%, specificity 88%), and 95.6% of PA patients increased PAC ≥50% on UPT (median 222.2%), while renin remained suppressed. All 41 PA patients with false-negative IV ST (PAC < 162 pmol/L) and 88.9% with borderline response (162-240 pmol/L) had a DRCmax ≤12, while, respectively, 97.6% and 100% increased aldosterone by ≥50%. Similar responses to UPT were found in lateralized (28/63) and bilateral PA source (35/63). PA diagnosis increased from 23.6% to 88.8% using UPT results instead of IV ST and were confirmed at pathology and clinical outcome after adrenalectomy (n = 22).

Conclusion: UPT can be useful to confirm PA, particularly in patients with suspected false-negative ST.

直立姿势测试在诊断原发性醛固酮增多症中的实用性。
目的评估直立姿势刺激试验(UPT)在盐水试验(ST)不能确诊的原发性醛固酮增多症(PA)患者中的实用性:方法:回顾性纳入 187 名可能患有 PA 的成年患者,并与 25 名对照组受试者进行比较。在仰卧 1 小时后和行走 2 小时后采集血液样本。血浆醛固酮浓度(PAC)增加≥50%且肾素受抑制(≤10.1纳克/升;≤1纳克/毫升/小时)和皮质醇增加≤50%均被视为异常:与对照组相比,PA 患者的基础 PAC 较高,基础直接肾素浓度 (DRC) 较低(P < .0001),UPT 期间的最大 PAC 较高(P = .0025),最大 DRC (DRCmax) 较低(P < .0001)。根据口服/静脉注射 ST 或 UPT,145 名患者(77.5%)证实了 PA。UPT 期间 DRCmax≤12 纳克/升是 PA 的预测指标(接收器操作特征曲线灵敏度为 93.8%,特异性为 88%),95.6% 的 PA 患者在 UPT 期间 PAC 升高≥50%(中位数为 222.2%),而肾素仍受到抑制。所有 41 名 IV ST 假阴性 PA 患者(PAC < 162 pmol/L)和 88.9% 的边缘反应患者(162-240 pmol/L)的 DRCmax 均≤12,而分别有 97.6% 和 100% 的患者醛固酮增加≥50%。侧源(28/63)和双侧 PA 源(35/63)对 UPT 的反应相似。使用 UPT 结果而非 IV ST 诊断 PA 的比例从 23.6% 上升至 88.8%,并在肾上腺切除术后的病理和临床结果中得到证实(n = 22):结论:UPT可用于确诊PA,尤其适用于疑似ST假阴性的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Journal of the Endocrine Society Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2039
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信