Does disease etiology matter in long-term patency in extracranial-intracranial bypass?

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Laura Stone McGuire, Tatiana Abou-Mrad, Gursant Atwal, Sepideh Amin-Hanjani, Fady T Charbel
{"title":"Does disease etiology matter in long-term patency in extracranial-intracranial bypass?","authors":"Laura Stone McGuire, Tatiana Abou-Mrad, Gursant Atwal, Sepideh Amin-Hanjani, Fady T Charbel","doi":"10.3171/2024.6.JNS2414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass has been well described in chronic vaso-occlusive cerebrovascular diseases, including both moyamoya disease (MMD) and atherosclerotic disease (AD). This study aimed to compare factors associated with bypass occlusion between these two diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An institutional database of 357 patients with intracranial bypass procedures performed between August 2001 and May 2022 was retrospectively reviewed. Patients with MMD and AD were selected for study. Baseline characteristics, surgical technique, and flow-related measurements were compared in relation to the outcome of bypass occlusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 232 patients met inclusion criteria (AD, n = 108; MMD, n = 124). The average age and sex differed significantly between groups (AD 57.2 years, 56.5% male; MMD 36.6 years, 31.5% male; p < 0.001). The modified Rankin Scale scores at surgery and at follow-up were higher in the AD group (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively), showing a slightly worse baseline functional status, and higher rates of stroke were observed in the AD group by last follow-up (p = 0.005). Patients with AD also were more likely to require an interpositional graft (p < 0.001). At last follow-up, rates of occlusion did not differ between AD and MMD groups (25.2% vs 25.4%, respectively). Of occluded bypasses, the AD group had more occlusions within 1 week compared to MMD (51.9% vs 35.5%, p = 0.176), although the difference was not significant. In patients with more than 1 year of follow-up and in those with more than 2 years of follow-up, MMD tended to have higher rates of occlusion (31.2% vs 26.1% [p = 0.558], and 26.4% vs 20.7% [p = 0.564]). Flow measurements did not differ between AD and MMD groups, but in subgroup analyses of patients with AD and those with MMD, both bypass flow and cut flow index predicted occlusion in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite different disease etiologies treated with bypass, rates of occlusion at last follow-up did not vary between groups, although short-term follow-up would suggest earlier bypass failure in AD, and extended follow-up trended toward higher occlusion rates in MMD. Additionally, patients with AD were more likely to have further occurrences of stroke by last follow-up. Importantly, the bypass flow and cut flow index at the time of surgery predicted occlusion in both AD and MMD.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.6.JNS2414","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass has been well described in chronic vaso-occlusive cerebrovascular diseases, including both moyamoya disease (MMD) and atherosclerotic disease (AD). This study aimed to compare factors associated with bypass occlusion between these two diseases.

Methods: An institutional database of 357 patients with intracranial bypass procedures performed between August 2001 and May 2022 was retrospectively reviewed. Patients with MMD and AD were selected for study. Baseline characteristics, surgical technique, and flow-related measurements were compared in relation to the outcome of bypass occlusion.

Results: A total of 232 patients met inclusion criteria (AD, n = 108; MMD, n = 124). The average age and sex differed significantly between groups (AD 57.2 years, 56.5% male; MMD 36.6 years, 31.5% male; p < 0.001). The modified Rankin Scale scores at surgery and at follow-up were higher in the AD group (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively), showing a slightly worse baseline functional status, and higher rates of stroke were observed in the AD group by last follow-up (p = 0.005). Patients with AD also were more likely to require an interpositional graft (p < 0.001). At last follow-up, rates of occlusion did not differ between AD and MMD groups (25.2% vs 25.4%, respectively). Of occluded bypasses, the AD group had more occlusions within 1 week compared to MMD (51.9% vs 35.5%, p = 0.176), although the difference was not significant. In patients with more than 1 year of follow-up and in those with more than 2 years of follow-up, MMD tended to have higher rates of occlusion (31.2% vs 26.1% [p = 0.558], and 26.4% vs 20.7% [p = 0.564]). Flow measurements did not differ between AD and MMD groups, but in subgroup analyses of patients with AD and those with MMD, both bypass flow and cut flow index predicted occlusion in both groups.

Conclusions: Despite different disease etiologies treated with bypass, rates of occlusion at last follow-up did not vary between groups, although short-term follow-up would suggest earlier bypass failure in AD, and extended follow-up trended toward higher occlusion rates in MMD. Additionally, patients with AD were more likely to have further occurrences of stroke by last follow-up. Importantly, the bypass flow and cut flow index at the time of surgery predicted occlusion in both AD and MMD.

疾病病因对颅外-颅内搭桥术的长期通畅性有影响吗?
目的:颅外-颅内(EC-IC)搭桥术在慢性血管闭塞性脑血管疾病(包括莫亚莫亚氏病(MMD)和动脉粥样硬化性疾病(AD))中得到了广泛的应用。本研究旨在比较这两种疾病的旁路闭塞相关因素:方法:回顾性研究了2001年8月至2022年5月期间实施颅内搭桥术的357例患者的机构数据库。研究选择了MMD和AD患者。比较了基线特征、手术技术和血流相关测量与旁路闭塞结果的关系:共有 232 名患者符合纳入标准(AD,108 人;MMD,124 人)。两组患者的平均年龄和性别有明显差异(AD 57.2 岁,56.5% 为男性;MMD 36.6 岁,31.5% 为男性;P < 0.001)。AD组患者手术时和随访时的改良Rankin量表评分较高(分别为p = 0.004和p < 0.001),表明其基线功能状态稍差,而且在最后一次随访时,AD组患者的中风发生率较高(p = 0.005)。此外,AD 组患者更有可能需要植入人工血管(p < 0.001)。在最后一次随访时,AD 组和 MMD 组的闭塞率没有差异(分别为 25.2% 对 25.4%)。在闭塞旁路中,AD 组在 1 周内闭塞的比例高于 MMD 组(51.9% vs 35.5%,p = 0.176),但差异并不显著。在随访超过1年和超过2年的患者中,MMD的闭塞率往往更高(31.2% vs 26.1% [p = 0.558],26.4% vs 20.7% [p = 0.564])。AD组和MMD组的血流测量结果没有差异,但在对AD患者和MMD患者进行的亚组分析中,旁路血流和切流指数都能预测两组患者的闭塞情况:结论:尽管采用旁路治疗的病因不同,但各组患者在最后一次随访时的闭塞率并无差异,不过短期随访表明,AD患者的旁路失败时间更早,而MMD患者的随访时间更长,其闭塞率呈上升趋势。此外,AD 患者在最后一次随访时更有可能再次发生中风。重要的是,在 AD 和 MMD 患者中,手术时的旁路流量和切流指数都能预测闭塞情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信