Validity and Reliability of the Farsi Version of the Heartland Forgiveness Scale in Iranian Cardiovascular Patients.

IF 0.7 Q4 NURSING
Hamid Sharif-Nia, Erika Sivarajan Froelicher, Seyed Amirhossein Mazhari, Pardis Rahmatpour, Azar Jafari-Koulaee, Vahid Ganji, Maryam Ziyari, Amir Hossein Goudarzian
{"title":"Validity and Reliability of the Farsi Version of the Heartland Forgiveness Scale in Iranian Cardiovascular Patients.","authors":"Hamid Sharif-Nia, Erika Sivarajan Froelicher, Seyed Amirhossein Mazhari, Pardis Rahmatpour, Azar Jafari-Koulaee, Vahid Ganji, Maryam Ziyari, Amir Hossein Goudarzian","doi":"10.1891/JNM-2023-0113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> A Farsi version of the Heartland Forgiveness Scale (HFS-F) for assessing forgiveness in Iranian cardiovascular patients was not available. This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the Farsi version of HFS in this population. <b>Methods:</b> In this methodological cross-sectional research design, 400 Iranian cardiovascular patients completed the HFS-F between October 2019 and January 2020. We assessed the characteristics, content, and both exploratory and confirmatory construct validity of the measures. To evaluate the reliability and construct validity of the HFS-F, we calculated Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient. <b>Results:</b> Three factors were identified following confirmatory and deterministic factor analyses. The extracted factors demonstrated satisfactory reliability, exceeding a threshold of 0.7. <b>Conclusions:</b> The HFS-F exhibited a robust level of validity and reliability, rendering it a suitable instrument for future research endeavors.</p>","PeriodicalId":16585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing measurement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JNM-2023-0113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose: A Farsi version of the Heartland Forgiveness Scale (HFS-F) for assessing forgiveness in Iranian cardiovascular patients was not available. This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the Farsi version of HFS in this population. Methods: In this methodological cross-sectional research design, 400 Iranian cardiovascular patients completed the HFS-F between October 2019 and January 2020. We assessed the characteristics, content, and both exploratory and confirmatory construct validity of the measures. To evaluate the reliability and construct validity of the HFS-F, we calculated Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient. Results: Three factors were identified following confirmatory and deterministic factor analyses. The extracted factors demonstrated satisfactory reliability, exceeding a threshold of 0.7. Conclusions: The HFS-F exhibited a robust level of validity and reliability, rendering it a suitable instrument for future research endeavors.

伊朗心血管病人心境宽恕量表波斯语版的有效性和可靠性。
背景和目的:目前还没有用于评估伊朗心血管病患者宽恕程度的波斯语版心境宽恕量表(HFS-F)。本研究旨在确定波斯语版 HFS 在该人群中的有效性和可靠性。研究方法在这项方法学横断面研究设计中,400 名伊朗心血管患者在 2019 年 10 月至 2020 年 1 月期间完成了 HFS-F。我们评估了测量的特征、内容以及探索性和确认性构架效度。为了评估 HFS-F 的信度和建构效度,我们计算了 Cronbach's alpha、McDonald's omega 和类内相关系数。结果:经过确认性和确定性因子分析,确定了三个因子。提取的因子显示出令人满意的可靠性,超过了 0.7 的临界值。结论:HFS-FHFS-F 具有很高的效度和信度,适用于未来的研究工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Measurement specifically addresses instrumentation in nursing. It serves as a prime forum for disseminating information on instruments, tools, approaches, and procedures developed or utilized for measuring variables in nursing research, practice, and education. Particular emphasis is placed on evidence for the reliability and validity or sensitivity and specificity of such instruments. The journal includes innovative discussions of theories, principles, practices, and issues relevant to nursing measurement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信