Optical microscopy evaluation of root canal filling removal by beginner operators in posterior teeth.

Q3 Medicine
Bogdan Dimitriu, Ioana Suciu, Oana Elena Amza, Mihai Ciocârdel, Dana Bodnar, Ana Maria Cristina Țâncu, Mihaela Tanase, Maria Sabina Branescu, Mihaela Chirilă
{"title":"Optical microscopy evaluation of root canal filling removal by beginner operators in posterior teeth.","authors":"Bogdan Dimitriu, Ioana Suciu, Oana Elena Amza, Mihai Ciocârdel, Dana Bodnar, Ana Maria Cristina Țâncu, Mihaela Tanase, Maria Sabina Branescu, Mihaela Chirilă","doi":"10.25122/jml-2024-0283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study analyzed the effectiveness of root canal filling removal in lower molars performed by beginner operators using optical microscopy. A total of 55 mandibular first and second molars with mesial roots exhibiting an average curvature of 10-20° were selected based on preoperative radiographs. Instrumentation was done with ProTaper Gold (Dentsply Sirona) up to F2 (25/.08), using 2ml of 2.5% NaOCl irrigation solution after each file. Root canal obturation was performed using gutta-percha points with cold lateral condensation and Sealapex (Kerr Dental). Coronal fillings were made with composite resin and stored in distilled water for two years. Removal of the root canal fillings was performed with AF Retreatment Rotary (AFRR) and AF Blue R3 (AFBR3) (Fanta Dental Materials) under reciprocating motion with 2.5% NaOCl irrigation. Cross-sections of the coronal, middle, and apical thirds were analyzed at 40x magnification using a STEINDORFF POL microscope with a digital camera. Image analysis was conducted using Image J software, version 1.54, to determine the efficiency of root canal filling removal by percentage. Statistical analysis via one-way ANOVA revealed significant differences between distal and mesial roots (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Specifically, for mesial roots, the removal efficiency was 70.65% in the coronal third, 54.66% in the middle third, and 21.32% in the apical third. Significant difficulties were noted due to fractured files, calcifications, and debris accumulation in the isthmuses. The study concluded that the protocol using Fanta files demonstrated significant differences in removal efficiency correlated with root curvature, compounded by the inexperience of beginner operators. The findings highlight the challenges faced by novice practitioners in achieving effective root canal filling removal.</p>","PeriodicalId":16386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine and Life","volume":"17 6","pages":"555-563"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11407485/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine and Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2024-0283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study analyzed the effectiveness of root canal filling removal in lower molars performed by beginner operators using optical microscopy. A total of 55 mandibular first and second molars with mesial roots exhibiting an average curvature of 10-20° were selected based on preoperative radiographs. Instrumentation was done with ProTaper Gold (Dentsply Sirona) up to F2 (25/.08), using 2ml of 2.5% NaOCl irrigation solution after each file. Root canal obturation was performed using gutta-percha points with cold lateral condensation and Sealapex (Kerr Dental). Coronal fillings were made with composite resin and stored in distilled water for two years. Removal of the root canal fillings was performed with AF Retreatment Rotary (AFRR) and AF Blue R3 (AFBR3) (Fanta Dental Materials) under reciprocating motion with 2.5% NaOCl irrigation. Cross-sections of the coronal, middle, and apical thirds were analyzed at 40x magnification using a STEINDORFF POL microscope with a digital camera. Image analysis was conducted using Image J software, version 1.54, to determine the efficiency of root canal filling removal by percentage. Statistical analysis via one-way ANOVA revealed significant differences between distal and mesial roots (P < 0.05). Specifically, for mesial roots, the removal efficiency was 70.65% in the coronal third, 54.66% in the middle third, and 21.32% in the apical third. Significant difficulties were noted due to fractured files, calcifications, and debris accumulation in the isthmuses. The study concluded that the protocol using Fanta files demonstrated significant differences in removal efficiency correlated with root curvature, compounded by the inexperience of beginner operators. The findings highlight the challenges faced by novice practitioners in achieving effective root canal filling removal.

光学显微镜评估初学者对后牙根管充填物的清除。
本研究使用光学显微镜分析了初级操作者对下磨牙根管充填物去除的效果。根据术前X光片,共选择了55颗下颌第一和第二磨牙,其中轴根的平均弯曲度为10-20°。使用 ProTaper Gold(Dentsply Sirona)进行器械操作,最高可达 F2 (25/.08),每个锉后使用 2 毫升 2.5% NaOCl 冲洗液。根管封固采用古塔波胶点冷侧凝和 Sealapex(Kerr Dental)。冠状充填使用复合树脂,并在蒸馏水中保存两年。使用 AF Retreatment Rotary(AFRR)和 AF Blue R3(AFBR3)(Fanta Dental Materials)在往复运动和 2.5% NaOCl 冲洗下去除根管填充物。使用带有数码相机的 STEINDORFF POL 显微镜,以 40 倍放大率对冠状切面、中切面和根尖切面进行分析。使用 Image J 1.54 版软件进行图像分析,以确定根管填充物去除效率的百分比。通过单因素方差分析进行的统计分析显示,远端根和中侧根之间存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。具体来说,对于中侧根,冠状三分之一处的去除效率为 70.65%,中间三分之一处为 54.66%,根尖三分之一处为 21.32%。由于锉刀断裂、钙化以及峡部碎屑堆积等原因,拔牙存在很大困难。研究得出结论,使用Fanta锉的方案在去除效率方面表现出与牙根弯曲度相关的显著差异,而初学者操作者经验不足又加剧了这种差异。研究结果凸显了新手操作者在实现有效根管填充物清除方面所面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medicine and Life
Journal of Medicine and Life Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medicine and Life publishes peer-reviewed articles from various fields of medicine and life sciences, including original research, systematic reviews, special reports, case presentations, major medical breakthroughs and letters to the editor. The Journal focuses on current matters that lie at the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice and strives to present this information to inform health care delivery and improve patient outcomes. Papers addressing topics such as neuroprotection, neurorehabilitation, neuroplasticity, and neuroregeneration are particularly encouraged, as part of the Journal''s continuous interest in neuroscience research. The Editorial Board of the Journal of Medicine and Life is open to consider manuscripts from all levels of research and areas of biological sciences, including fundamental, experimental or clinical research and matters of public health. As part of our pledge to promote an educational and community-building environment, our issues feature sections designated to informing our readers regarding exciting international congresses, teaching courses and relevant institutional-level events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信