Affordable in-house tests for bacteriuria can improve antimicrobial stewardship and access to care.

IF 1.6 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Kayla Sample, Claire Fellman, Greg Wolfus, Benjamin Koethe, Jennifer Grady
{"title":"Affordable in-house tests for bacteriuria can improve antimicrobial stewardship and access to care.","authors":"Kayla Sample, Claire Fellman, Greg Wolfus, Benjamin Koethe, Jennifer Grady","doi":"10.2460/javma.24.05.0307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the clinical utility of 3 in-house tests to screen for bacteriuria in dogs with urinary conditions: a computerized urine sediment analyzer (SediVue), a rapid immunoassay (RapidBac), and in-house urine culture. Accuracy of culture and antimicrobial susceptibility (C&S) results from submission of the positive in-house culture plate and a 24- to 48-hour refrigerated urine sample was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sterile urine samples from 101 client-owned dogs were used to evaluate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 3 in-house diagnostic tests to detect bacteriuria using C&S testing at a reference laboratory as the reference standard. For positive in-house culture plates, the plate and a 24- to 48-hour refrigerated urine sample were submitted to the reference laboratory for C&S testing and compared to the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reference standard C&S was positive in 25 of 101 cases (25%). All 3 in-house diagnostic tests had high negative predictive values: SediVue was 89% (95% CI, 81% to 96%), RapidBac was 93% (95% CI, 88% to 99%), and in-house culture was 99% (95% CI, 96% to 100%). Positive predictive values were 89% (95% CI, 74% to 100%) for SediVue, 77% (95% CI, 61% to 93%) for RapidBac, and 86% (95% CI, 73% to 99%) for in-house culture. Culture and antimicrobial susceptibility results from submission of the positive in-house plates and refrigerated urine samples approximated the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SediVue, RapidBac, and in-house cultures performed well to rule out canine bacteriuria.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Inexpensive in-house diagnostic tests can be used to screen for bacteriuria prior to submission of C&S testing, which promotes antimicrobial stewardship, responsible use of client resources, and access to veterinary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":14658,"journal":{"name":"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.24.05.0307","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical utility of 3 in-house tests to screen for bacteriuria in dogs with urinary conditions: a computerized urine sediment analyzer (SediVue), a rapid immunoassay (RapidBac), and in-house urine culture. Accuracy of culture and antimicrobial susceptibility (C&S) results from submission of the positive in-house culture plate and a 24- to 48-hour refrigerated urine sample was also assessed.

Methods: Sterile urine samples from 101 client-owned dogs were used to evaluate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 3 in-house diagnostic tests to detect bacteriuria using C&S testing at a reference laboratory as the reference standard. For positive in-house culture plates, the plate and a 24- to 48-hour refrigerated urine sample were submitted to the reference laboratory for C&S testing and compared to the reference standard.

Results: The reference standard C&S was positive in 25 of 101 cases (25%). All 3 in-house diagnostic tests had high negative predictive values: SediVue was 89% (95% CI, 81% to 96%), RapidBac was 93% (95% CI, 88% to 99%), and in-house culture was 99% (95% CI, 96% to 100%). Positive predictive values were 89% (95% CI, 74% to 100%) for SediVue, 77% (95% CI, 61% to 93%) for RapidBac, and 86% (95% CI, 73% to 99%) for in-house culture. Culture and antimicrobial susceptibility results from submission of the positive in-house plates and refrigerated urine samples approximated the reference standard.

Conclusions: SediVue, RapidBac, and in-house cultures performed well to rule out canine bacteriuria.

Clinical relevance: Inexpensive in-house diagnostic tests can be used to screen for bacteriuria prior to submission of C&S testing, which promotes antimicrobial stewardship, responsible use of client resources, and access to veterinary care.

经济实惠的内部菌尿检测可提高抗菌药物管理水平和医疗服务的可及性。
目的评估用于筛查犬泌尿系统细菌尿的 3 种内部测试的临床实用性:计算机化尿沉渣分析仪(SediVue)、快速免疫测定(RapidBac)和内部尿液培养。此外,还对提交阳性内部培养板和 24 至 48 小时冷藏尿样的培养和抗菌药敏感性(C&S)结果的准确性进行了评估:方法:以参考实验室的 C&S 检测为参考标准,使用 101 只客户饲养的犬的无菌尿样来评估 3 种检测菌尿的内部诊断检测的灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。对于阳性的内部培养板,该培养板和 24 至 48 小时冷藏尿样将被送往参考实验室进行 C&S 检测,并与参考标准进行比较:结果:101 个病例中有 25 个(25%)参考标准 C&S 呈阳性。所有 3 种内部诊断检测的阴性预测值都很高:SediVue为89%(95% CI,81%至96%),RapidBac为93%(95% CI,88%至99%),内部培养为99%(95% CI,96%至100%)。SediVue 的阳性预测值为 89%(95% CI,74%-100%),RapidBac 为 77%(95% CI,61%-93%),内部培养为 86%(95% CI,73%-99%)。呈阳性的内部平板和冷藏尿液样本的培养和抗菌药敏感性结果接近参考标准:结论:SediVue、RapidBac 和内部培养在排除犬细菌尿方面表现良好:临床意义:在提交 C&S 检测之前,可使用价格低廉的内部诊断检测来筛查犬细菌尿,从而促进抗菌药物管理、负责任地使用客户资源和获得兽医护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
15.80%
发文量
539
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Published twice monthly, this peer-reviewed, general scientific journal provides reports of clinical research, feature articles and regular columns of interest to veterinarians in private and public practice. The News and Classified Ad sections are posted online 10 days to two weeks before they are delivered in print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信