Increasing the reach: optimizing screening for atrial fibrillation-the STROKESTOP III study.

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Europace Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1093/europace/euae234
Mashroor Khan, Michael Ingre, Fredrik Carlstedt, Anders Eriksson, Sofia Skröder, Johanna Star Tenn, Mårten Rosenqvist, Emma Svennberg
{"title":"Increasing the reach: optimizing screening for atrial fibrillation-the STROKESTOP III study.","authors":"Mashroor Khan, Michael Ingre, Fredrik Carlstedt, Anders Eriksson, Sofia Skröder, Johanna Star Tenn, Mårten Rosenqvist, Emma Svennberg","doi":"10.1093/europace/euae234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of cardiac arrythmia and is an important risk factor for ischaemic stroke. Many cases of AF remain undiagnosed due to its paroxysmal, intermittent, and often asymptomatic nature. Early detection of AF through screening and initiation of treatment with oral anticoagulants can prevent stroke, increase life expectancy, and decrease the cost of healthcare for the society. However, participation has been low in previous AF screening studies employing population screening. The aim of this study is to determine whether opportunistic screening is a superior method to increase participation in comparison to population screening. We hypothesize that opportunistic screening will significantly increase participation.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>In our study, STROKESTOP III, a randomized prospective cohort study, we compare two different methods of AF screening in high-risk individuals: population screening vs. opportunistic screening. Sixteen different primary clinics in Värmland, Sweden, serving 75-76-year-old individuals (n = 2954), will be randomized to either population screening or opportunistic screening. The individuals will be instructed to record electrocardiogram (ECG) for 30 s, 3 times daily for 2 weeks, using a handheld one-lead ECG device. Patients with detected AF will be referred to their primary healthcare physician and offered treatment. The main objective of the study is to determine the rate of participation in opportunistic screening in comparison to population screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The STROKESTOP III study will provide valuable information on which screening method to use for improved participation in atrial fibrillation screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":11981,"journal":{"name":"Europace","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11413581/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europace","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae234","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of cardiac arrythmia and is an important risk factor for ischaemic stroke. Many cases of AF remain undiagnosed due to its paroxysmal, intermittent, and often asymptomatic nature. Early detection of AF through screening and initiation of treatment with oral anticoagulants can prevent stroke, increase life expectancy, and decrease the cost of healthcare for the society. However, participation has been low in previous AF screening studies employing population screening. The aim of this study is to determine whether opportunistic screening is a superior method to increase participation in comparison to population screening. We hypothesize that opportunistic screening will significantly increase participation.

Methods and results: In our study, STROKESTOP III, a randomized prospective cohort study, we compare two different methods of AF screening in high-risk individuals: population screening vs. opportunistic screening. Sixteen different primary clinics in Värmland, Sweden, serving 75-76-year-old individuals (n = 2954), will be randomized to either population screening or opportunistic screening. The individuals will be instructed to record electrocardiogram (ECG) for 30 s, 3 times daily for 2 weeks, using a handheld one-lead ECG device. Patients with detected AF will be referred to their primary healthcare physician and offered treatment. The main objective of the study is to determine the rate of participation in opportunistic screening in comparison to population screening.

Conclusions: The STROKESTOP III study will provide valuable information on which screening method to use for improved participation in atrial fibrillation screening.

扩大覆盖范围:优化心房颤动筛查:STROKESTOP III 研究。
目的和假设:心房颤动(房颤)是最常见的心律失常类型,也是缺血性中风的重要危险因素。由于心房颤动具有阵发性、间歇性和无症状的特点,许多心房颤动病例仍未得到诊断。通过筛查及使用口服抗凝药(OACs)进行治疗来早期发现房颤可预防中风、延长预期寿命并降低社会医疗成本。然而,在以往采用人群筛查的房颤筛查研究中,参与率较低。本研究旨在确定与人群筛查相比,机会性筛查是否是提高参与率的更好方法。我们假设机会性筛查将显著提高参与率:在我们的研究 STROKESTOP III(一项随机前瞻性队列研究)中,我们比较了对高危人群进行房颤筛查的两种不同方法:人群筛查与机会性筛查。瑞典韦姆兰省 16 家不同的基层诊所将为 75-76 岁的患者(n = 2954)提供服务,这些患者将随机接受人群筛查或机会性筛查。将指导患者使用手持式单导联心电图仪记录心电图,每天 3 次,每次 30 秒,持续两周。检测出心房颤动的患者将被转诊至其初级保健医生并接受治疗。该研究的主要目的是确定机会性筛查与人群筛查的参与率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Europace
Europace 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
8.20%
发文量
851
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: EP - Europace - European Journal of Pacing, Arrhythmias and Cardiac Electrophysiology of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology. The journal aims to provide an avenue of communication of top quality European and international original scientific work and reviews in the fields of Arrhythmias, Pacing and Cellular Electrophysiology. The Journal offers the reader a collection of contemporary original peer-reviewed papers, invited papers and editorial comments together with book reviews and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信