Development and validation of a questionnaire (QSPC-Q) for assessment of quality and strengthening of primary care in Brazil.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ciencia & saude coletiva Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-18 DOI:10.1590/1413-812320242910.08722023
Mozart Júlio Tabosa Sales, Paulo Sávio Angeiras de Goes, Aline Priscila Rego de Carvalho, Caio Cesar Arruda da Silva, José Roberto da Silva Junior, Amanda Carolina Félix Cavalcanti de Abreu, Carolina Thaiza Costa Pazos, Suely Arruda Vidal
{"title":"Development and validation of a questionnaire (QSPC-Q) for assessment of quality and strengthening of primary care in Brazil.","authors":"Mozart Júlio Tabosa Sales, Paulo Sávio Angeiras de Goes, Aline Priscila Rego de Carvalho, Caio Cesar Arruda da Silva, José Roberto da Silva Junior, Amanda Carolina Félix Cavalcanti de Abreu, Carolina Thaiza Costa Pazos, Suely Arruda Vidal","doi":"10.1590/1413-812320242910.08722023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The performance evaluation of services through instruments is relevant, as it can support thoughts, actions and political approaches to meet a social need. The objective of the article was to develop and validate the Quality and Strengthening of Primary Care Questionnaire (QSPC-Q) for professionals and users based on Starfield attributes and Donabedian pillars. A mixed sequential study was performed to develop the QSPC-Q. The test was applied to 149 doctors and 795 users of basic health units. Psychometric properties was assessed by testing internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha and exploratory factor analysis. Reproducibility od scale was assessed using intraclass cognitive and test-retest correlation. The final version of the follow-up consisted of 45 items aimed at physicians (Cronbach's alpha = 0.921) and 33 at users (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86); the intraclass respiratory capacity was 0.88. An exploratory factor analysis identified 13 factors associated with the pattern components. A short version with 29 items for professionals was also elaborated. Professional QSPC-Q (short and braided versions) and user QSPC-Q were valid.</p>","PeriodicalId":10195,"journal":{"name":"Ciencia & saude coletiva","volume":"29 10","pages":"e08722023"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciencia & saude coletiva","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320242910.08722023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The performance evaluation of services through instruments is relevant, as it can support thoughts, actions and political approaches to meet a social need. The objective of the article was to develop and validate the Quality and Strengthening of Primary Care Questionnaire (QSPC-Q) for professionals and users based on Starfield attributes and Donabedian pillars. A mixed sequential study was performed to develop the QSPC-Q. The test was applied to 149 doctors and 795 users of basic health units. Psychometric properties was assessed by testing internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha and exploratory factor analysis. Reproducibility od scale was assessed using intraclass cognitive and test-retest correlation. The final version of the follow-up consisted of 45 items aimed at physicians (Cronbach's alpha = 0.921) and 33 at users (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86); the intraclass respiratory capacity was 0.88. An exploratory factor analysis identified 13 factors associated with the pattern components. A short version with 29 items for professionals was also elaborated. Professional QSPC-Q (short and braided versions) and user QSPC-Q were valid.

开发和验证用于评估巴西初级保健质量和加强初级保健的问卷(QSPC-Q)。
通过工具对服务进行绩效评估具有重要意义,因为它可以为满足社会需求的思想、行动和政治方法提供支持。这篇文章的目的是根据斯塔菲尔德属性和多纳比德支柱,为专业人员和用户开发并验证 "初级保健质量与强化问卷"(QSPC-Q)。为了开发 QSPC-Q,我们进行了一项混合序列研究。该测试适用于 149 名医生和 795 名基层医疗单位的用户。通过使用 Cronbach's alpha 和探索性因子分析测试内部一致性,对心理测量特性进行了评估。量表的再现性是通过类内认知和重复测试相关性来评估的。随访的最终版本包括针对医生的 45 个项目(Cronbach's alpha = 0.921)和针对用户的 33 个项目(Cronbach's alpha = 0.86);类内呼吸容量为 0.88。探索性因子分析确定了与模式成分相关的 13 个因子。此外,还为专业人员设计了一个包含 29 个项目的简短版本。专业人员 QSPC-Q(简短版和编织版)和用户 QSPC-Q 均有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ciencia & saude coletiva
Ciencia & saude coletiva PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
533
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ciência & Saúde Coletiva publishes debates, analyses, and results of research on a Specific Theme considered current and relevant to the field of Collective Health. Its abbreviated title is Ciênc. saúde coletiva, which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信