A revisit of knowledge, attitude and practice of emergency contraception in Hong Kong.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Yat Yee Shizuka Chan, Siu Fan Rebecca Wan, Hang Wun Raymond Li, Sue Seen-Tsing Lo
{"title":"A revisit of knowledge, attitude and practice of emergency contraception in Hong Kong.","authors":"Yat Yee Shizuka Chan, Siu Fan Rebecca Wan, Hang Wun Raymond Li, Sue Seen-Tsing Lo","doi":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To revisit women's knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) regarding emergency contraception (EC) in Hong Kong. The research sought to provide insights for improving the accessibility and quality of EC services.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A cross-sectional study, where self-administered questionnaires were distributed at a major community sexual and reproductive health service in Hong Kong over a 3-month period between July 2023 and October 2023. Descriptive and regression analyses were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1127 respondents, the majority (n=1057, 93.8%) reported using contraception and 513 (45.6%) had used EC. The main contraceptive methods used were male condoms and oral contraceptive pills. The majority (n=1035, 91.8%) of respondents demonstrated awareness about EC and 938 (83.2%) participants correctly reported the timeframe for oral EC. Around two-thirds reported the internet as being their leading source of EC knowledge. Over 93% of respondents advocated for enhancing public awareness. Acceptance of non-traditional means of obtaining EC, such as over-the-counter provision (51.3%), pharmacy provision (49.8%) and telemedicine consultation (43.1%), were higher than face-to-face EC consultations (32.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Family planning service users' characteristics and KAP regarding EC have significantly changed over the last 20 years. Women now demonstrate greater awareness, knowledge and openness regarding EC, indicating improved readiness for more liberal delivery of EC nowadays. This study highlights the need for restructuring EC service provision in Hong Kong to address women's changing preferences and contraceptive needs, and to minimise barriers to EC access. We recommend reclassifying emergency contraceptive pills as non-prescription drugs in Hong Kong to align with international practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":9219,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202331","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To revisit women's knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) regarding emergency contraception (EC) in Hong Kong. The research sought to provide insights for improving the accessibility and quality of EC services.

Study design: A cross-sectional study, where self-administered questionnaires were distributed at a major community sexual and reproductive health service in Hong Kong over a 3-month period between July 2023 and October 2023. Descriptive and regression analyses were used.

Results: Of 1127 respondents, the majority (n=1057, 93.8%) reported using contraception and 513 (45.6%) had used EC. The main contraceptive methods used were male condoms and oral contraceptive pills. The majority (n=1035, 91.8%) of respondents demonstrated awareness about EC and 938 (83.2%) participants correctly reported the timeframe for oral EC. Around two-thirds reported the internet as being their leading source of EC knowledge. Over 93% of respondents advocated for enhancing public awareness. Acceptance of non-traditional means of obtaining EC, such as over-the-counter provision (51.3%), pharmacy provision (49.8%) and telemedicine consultation (43.1%), were higher than face-to-face EC consultations (32.9%).

Conclusions: Family planning service users' characteristics and KAP regarding EC have significantly changed over the last 20 years. Women now demonstrate greater awareness, knowledge and openness regarding EC, indicating improved readiness for more liberal delivery of EC nowadays. This study highlights the need for restructuring EC service provision in Hong Kong to address women's changing preferences and contraceptive needs, and to minimise barriers to EC access. We recommend reclassifying emergency contraceptive pills as non-prescription drugs in Hong Kong to align with international practice.

重新审视香港人对紧急避孕的认识、态度和做法。
目的重新审视香港妇女对紧急避孕药具(EC)的认识、态度和做法(KAP)。研究设计:研究设计:横断面研究,在 2023 年 7 月至 2023 年 10 月的 3 个月期间,在香港一家大型社区性健康和生殖健康服务机构发放自填问卷。研究采用了描述性分析和回归分析:在 1127 名受訪者中,大部分(1057 人,93.8%)表示曾使用避孕方法,其中 513 人(45.6%)曾使用避孕药具。使用的主要避孕方法是男用避孕套和口服避孕药。大多数受访者(n=1035,91.8%)表示了解避孕药具,938 名(83.2%)受访者正确说出了口服避孕药的时限。约三分之二的受访者表示,互联网是他们了解避孕药知识的主要来源。超过 93%的受访者主张提高公众意识。受访者对非传统方式获取避孕药具的接受程度高于面对面咨询(32.9%),如非处方药(51.3%)、药房(49.8%)和远程医疗咨询(43.1%):结论:在过去 20 年中,计划生育服务使用者的特点和有关心血管疾病的 KAP 发生了显著变化。现在,妇女对生殖健康的认识、了解和开放程度都有所提高,这表明她们更愿意接受更自由的生殖健康服务。这项研究指出,香港有必要重整提供的紧急避孕药具服务,以满足妇女不断变化的喜好和避孕需求,并尽量减少获得紧急避孕药具的障碍。我們建議香港把緊急避孕丸重新歸類為非處方藥物,與國際做法看齊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health Medicine-Reproductive Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health is a multiprofessional journal that promotes sexual and reproductive health and wellbeing, and best contraceptive practice, worldwide. It publishes research, debate and comment to inform policy and practice, and recognises the importance of professional-patient partnership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信