Comparison of postoperative pain between InterTan and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in femoral intertrochanteric fractures: a retrospective study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2024-08-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62347/UVLL3087
Jing Li, Sheng Wang, Nan Lu, Aimin Chen
{"title":"Comparison of postoperative pain between InterTan and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in femoral intertrochanteric fractures: a retrospective study.","authors":"Jing Li, Sheng Wang, Nan Lu, Aimin Chen","doi":"10.62347/UVLL3087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the postoperative pain experienced by elderly patients with unstable trochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) and InterTan Nail, focusing on identifying differences among this demographic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 40 elderly patients (age >80 years old) underwent treatment with either the PFNA Nail or InterTan Nail. Observational metrics included the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, changes in implant position via X-ray, blood loss, fixation failures, and Harris Hip Scores (HHS) to assess complications and hip function at various time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 26 patients in the PFNA Nail group (Group A) and 26 patients in the InterTan Nail group (Group B). No significant differences were found in the main observational indicators between the two groups (all P>0.05). Both groups showed significant improvement in HHS post-surgery (all P<0.05). However, early post-operative pain scores were lower in the Group B (3.65±1.2) compared to Group A (5.5±0.9) (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite different implant materials being used, outcomes in both groups were consistent and reliable among elderly patients. No significant differences were observed in terms of postoperative functional recovery, mortality, or complications between the groups. Notably, in the early postoperative period (3 days postoperatively), the Group B demonstrated significantly superior pain scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384393/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/UVLL3087","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the postoperative pain experienced by elderly patients with unstable trochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) and InterTan Nail, focusing on identifying differences among this demographic.

Methods: A total of 40 elderly patients (age >80 years old) underwent treatment with either the PFNA Nail or InterTan Nail. Observational metrics included the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, changes in implant position via X-ray, blood loss, fixation failures, and Harris Hip Scores (HHS) to assess complications and hip function at various time points.

Results: The study included 26 patients in the PFNA Nail group (Group A) and 26 patients in the InterTan Nail group (Group B). No significant differences were found in the main observational indicators between the two groups (all P>0.05). Both groups showed significant improvement in HHS post-surgery (all P<0.05). However, early post-operative pain scores were lower in the Group B (3.65±1.2) compared to Group A (5.5±0.9) (P<0.001).

Conclusions: Despite different implant materials being used, outcomes in both groups were consistent and reliable among elderly patients. No significant differences were observed in terms of postoperative functional recovery, mortality, or complications between the groups. Notably, in the early postoperative period (3 days postoperatively), the Group B demonstrated significantly superior pain scores.

股骨转子间骨折 InterTan 和股骨近端钉抗旋转术后疼痛的比较:一项回顾性研究。
目的比较股骨近端抗旋转钉(PFNA)和InterTan钉治疗不稳定转子状骨折老年患者的术后疼痛情况,重点确定这一人群之间的差异:共有 40 名老年患者(年龄大于 80 岁)接受了 PFNA 钉或 InterTan 钉治疗。观察指标包括疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)、通过 X 光检查植入物位置的变化、失血量、固定失败以及哈里斯髋关节评分(HHS),以评估不同时间点的并发症和髋关节功能:研究包括 PFNA 钉组(A 组)和 InterTan 钉组(B 组)的 26 名患者。两组患者的主要观察指标无明显差异(P>0.05)。两组患者术后的 HHS 均有明显改善(均为 PC 结论):尽管使用的种植体材料不同,但两组老年患者的疗效一致且可靠。两组患者在术后功能恢复、死亡率和并发症方面没有明显差异。值得注意的是,在术后早期(术后 3 天),B 组的疼痛评分明显更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信