Sedation of Adults with Orally Administered Midazolam in Dentistry - A Retrospective Study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Marika Storskrubb, Pia Gabre
{"title":"Sedation of Adults with Orally Administered Midazolam in Dentistry - A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Marika Storskrubb, Pia Gabre","doi":"10.2340/aos.v83.41403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The use of midazolam (MZ) has increased in dentistry, but the effect in adults is sparsely studied. The aim of this study was to investigate doses, effects, and side effects of orally administered MZ as a sedative for adults in a dental care organization.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective record review was performed including all adult patients in the dental care organization ≥20 years receiving MZ, identified through a logbook for addictive drugs, during 2020. From patients' records, the following data were extracted: age, gender, medical history, reason for sedation, performed treatments, doses, effects, and side effects of MZ.  Results: In total, 265 patients on 418 occasions had been sedated, which constituted 2.3 sedations per 1,000 visits and 3.3 sedations per 1,000 treated patients. Mean age was 40.8 years and 67.7% were females. The most common reason for sedation was anxiety. Mean dose in primary dental clinics was 7.9 mg and in specialist clinics, 6.8 mg (p < 0.001). Older patients (>70 years) had lower doses than younger (p < 0.001), while no difference was found between ages 55-70 years and those who were younger. Dental treatment was completed in 91.9% of occasions, and side effects were registered in 2.2%. Successful dental treatment was related to type of treatment performed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sedation is rarely used, particularly in primary dental care, and the use varies widely between clinics. MZ administered by dentists seems to be safe and effective. A sedation record should be used to make patient data such as weight and medical conditions available.</p>","PeriodicalId":7313,"journal":{"name":"Acta Odontologica Scandinavica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Odontologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v83.41403","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The use of midazolam (MZ) has increased in dentistry, but the effect in adults is sparsely studied. The aim of this study was to investigate doses, effects, and side effects of orally administered MZ as a sedative for adults in a dental care organization.

Material and methods: A retrospective record review was performed including all adult patients in the dental care organization ≥20 years receiving MZ, identified through a logbook for addictive drugs, during 2020. From patients' records, the following data were extracted: age, gender, medical history, reason for sedation, performed treatments, doses, effects, and side effects of MZ.  Results: In total, 265 patients on 418 occasions had been sedated, which constituted 2.3 sedations per 1,000 visits and 3.3 sedations per 1,000 treated patients. Mean age was 40.8 years and 67.7% were females. The most common reason for sedation was anxiety. Mean dose in primary dental clinics was 7.9 mg and in specialist clinics, 6.8 mg (p < 0.001). Older patients (>70 years) had lower doses than younger (p < 0.001), while no difference was found between ages 55-70 years and those who were younger. Dental treatment was completed in 91.9% of occasions, and side effects were registered in 2.2%. Successful dental treatment was related to type of treatment performed.

Conclusions: Sedation is rarely used, particularly in primary dental care, and the use varies widely between clinics. MZ administered by dentists seems to be safe and effective. A sedation record should be used to make patient data such as weight and medical conditions available.

牙科口服咪达唑仑对成人的镇静作用 - 一项回顾性研究。
目的:咪达唑仑(MZ)在牙科中的使用有所增加,但对其在成人中的效果研究却很少。本研究旨在调查一家牙科医疗机构中口服 MZ 作为成人镇静剂的剂量、效果和副作用:研究人员对 2020 年期间牙科医疗机构中所有年龄≥20 岁、接受过 MZ 治疗的成年患者进行了回顾性记录审查,并通过成瘾药物记录簿确定了这些患者。从患者记录中提取了以下数据:年龄、性别、病史、镇静原因、已进行的治疗、MZ的剂量、效果和副作用。 结果:共有 265 名患者在 418 次治疗中使用了镇静剂,即每 1,000 次就诊中有 2.3 次使用镇静剂,每 1,000 名接受治疗的患者中有 3.3 次使用镇静剂。平均年龄为 40.8 岁,67.7% 为女性。最常见的镇静原因是焦虑。初级牙科诊所的平均剂量为 7.9 毫克,专科诊所为 6.8 毫克(p < 0.001)。老年患者(70 岁以上)的剂量低于年轻患者(p < 0.001),而 55-70 岁的患者与年轻患者的剂量没有差异。91.9%的患者完成了牙科治疗,2.2%的患者出现了副作用。成功的牙科治疗与治疗类型有关:结论:镇静剂很少使用,尤其是在初级牙科护理中,而且不同诊所的使用情况差异很大。牙医使用 MZ 似乎安全有效。应使用镇静记录来提供患者的体重和医疗条件等数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Odontologica Scandinavica publishes papers conveying new knowledge within all areas of oral health and disease sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信