Economic drivers of deforestation in the Brazilian Legal Amazon

IF 25.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Eduardo A. Haddad, Inácio F. Araújo, Rafael Feltran-Barbieri, Fernando S. Perobelli, Ademir Rocha, Karina S. Sass, Carlos A. Nobre
{"title":"Economic drivers of deforestation in the Brazilian Legal Amazon","authors":"Eduardo A. Haddad, Inácio F. Araújo, Rafael Feltran-Barbieri, Fernando S. Perobelli, Ademir Rocha, Karina S. Sass, Carlos A. Nobre","doi":"10.1038/s41893-024-01387-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deforestation in the Brazilian Legal Amazon remains a challenge due to its detrimental effects on ecosystems and the associated increase in greenhouse gas emissions. Such deforestation can be driven by foreign demand in terms of international exports, as well as domestic demand. However, most efforts to quantify the associations between consumer markets and deforestation mainly consider international exports rather than domestic and local sources of demand. Here we show that economic demand originating in the more developed Brazilian centre-south imposes a much stronger pressure on the Amazon’s deforestation than local (within the Amazon) and foreign export demand. Acknowledging domestic markets as a critical driver of changes in forest cover in the region emphasizes the need for increased engagement by national and transnational stakeholders operating in national markets in Brazil. Domestic environmental traceability must be linked to sanitary and fiscal controls at interstate and interregional borders, helping promote transparency in the deforestation intensity of inputs and products originating from the Brazilian Legal Amazon. This would promote sustainability by better informing policymakers about potential future stress regarding the Amazon’s resources under different scenarios of population growth, socio-economic development paths, institutional reforms and technical change. Deforestation, which can have detrimental consequences for native ecosystems and result in increased greenhouse gas emissions, is driven by different sources of economic demand. This study evaluates the role of local and domestic demand driving deforestation in the Brazilian Legal Amazon.","PeriodicalId":19056,"journal":{"name":"Nature Sustainability","volume":"7 9","pages":"1141-1148"},"PeriodicalIF":25.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-024-01387-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deforestation in the Brazilian Legal Amazon remains a challenge due to its detrimental effects on ecosystems and the associated increase in greenhouse gas emissions. Such deforestation can be driven by foreign demand in terms of international exports, as well as domestic demand. However, most efforts to quantify the associations between consumer markets and deforestation mainly consider international exports rather than domestic and local sources of demand. Here we show that economic demand originating in the more developed Brazilian centre-south imposes a much stronger pressure on the Amazon’s deforestation than local (within the Amazon) and foreign export demand. Acknowledging domestic markets as a critical driver of changes in forest cover in the region emphasizes the need for increased engagement by national and transnational stakeholders operating in national markets in Brazil. Domestic environmental traceability must be linked to sanitary and fiscal controls at interstate and interregional borders, helping promote transparency in the deforestation intensity of inputs and products originating from the Brazilian Legal Amazon. This would promote sustainability by better informing policymakers about potential future stress regarding the Amazon’s resources under different scenarios of population growth, socio-economic development paths, institutional reforms and technical change. Deforestation, which can have detrimental consequences for native ecosystems and result in increased greenhouse gas emissions, is driven by different sources of economic demand. This study evaluates the role of local and domestic demand driving deforestation in the Brazilian Legal Amazon.

Abstract Image

巴西亚马逊法定森林砍伐的经济驱动因素
巴西法定亚马逊地区的森林砍伐仍是一项挑战,因为它对生态系统造成了有害影响,并导致温室气体排放量增加。这种毁林行为可能是由国际出口方面的国外需求以及国内需求驱动的。然而,大多数量化消费市场与森林砍伐之间关联的工作主要考虑的是国际出口,而不是国内和本地需求来源。在这里,我们表明,与当地(亚马逊地区内)和国外出口需求相比,来自巴西中南部较发达地区的经济需求对亚马逊森林砍伐的压力要大得多。承认国内市场是该地区森林覆盖率变化的关键驱动力,强调了在巴西国内市场运营的国内和跨国利益相关者加强参与的必要性。国内环境可追溯性必须与国家间和地区间边界的卫生和财政控制联系起来,帮助提高源自巴西亚马逊法定地区的投入和产品的森林砍伐强度的透明度。这将使决策者更好地了解在人口增长、社会经济发展道路、体制改革和技术变革等不同情况下亚马逊资源未来可能面临的压力,从而促进可持续性。砍伐森林会对本地生态系统造成有害影响,并导致温室气体排放增加,而经济需求的驱动力则来自不同方面。本研究评估了当地和国内需求对巴西法定亚马逊地区森林砍伐的推动作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Sustainability
Nature Sustainability Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
41.90
自引率
1.10%
发文量
159
期刊介绍: Nature Sustainability aims to facilitate cross-disciplinary dialogues and bring together research fields that contribute to understanding how we organize our lives in a finite world and the impacts of our actions. Nature Sustainability will not only publish fundamental research but also significant investigations into policies and solutions for ensuring human well-being now and in the future.Its ultimate goal is to address the greatest challenges of our time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信