Critical evaluation of high-resolution and low-resolution mass spectrometry for biomonitoring of human environmental exposure to pesticides

IF 6.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Elies Zarrouk , Souleiman El Balkhi , Franck Saint-Marcoux
{"title":"Critical evaluation of high-resolution and low-resolution mass spectrometry for biomonitoring of human environmental exposure to pesticides","authors":"Elies Zarrouk ,&nbsp;Souleiman El Balkhi ,&nbsp;Franck Saint-Marcoux","doi":"10.1016/j.eti.2024.103834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite increasing debates about their potential side effects on human health, data concerning the risks and the impacts associated with pesticides remains scarce. Analytical tools allowing the measurement of most pesticides and/or their metabolites to which the population can be exposed are also of need. In the present study, the limits of detection (LODs) of 3 different screening procedures based on either Low-Resolution and High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (LR-MS and HR-MS) for the determination of pesticides in serum (among which carbamates, dithiocarbamates, neonicotinoids, organochlorines, organophosphates and pyrethroids) were explored. For HR-MS, a quadrupole time-of-flight was used in positive and negative electrospray ionization modes and data were obtained from either a targeted scheduled MSMS acquisition (HR-MSMS) or a data-independent acquisition (HR-DIA). For LR-MS, a triple quadrupole was used and data were acquired with a classical multiple-reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. Depending on the approach, the LOD values varied from 0.05 to 10 ng/mL. For the lowest concentrations, the proportion of molecules detected was systematically greater for the LR-MS approach, while those of HR-MSMS were better than those of HR-DIA. These differences in the LOD values were confirmed in a sample of 174 serums in which LR-MRM detected 89 compounds while HR-MSMS and HR-DIA detected 79 and 75 compounds, respectively. Nevertheless, for environmental and occupational purposes, HRMS approach could probably be efficient to detect most of pesticides and their metabolites in human serum and could be suitable for human biomonitoring studies or fundamental research exploring the impact of exposure to pesticides on human health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11725,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 103834"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186424003109/pdfft?md5=6566fdce7dce2b3193d297963a00703c&pid=1-s2.0-S2352186424003109-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186424003109","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite increasing debates about their potential side effects on human health, data concerning the risks and the impacts associated with pesticides remains scarce. Analytical tools allowing the measurement of most pesticides and/or their metabolites to which the population can be exposed are also of need. In the present study, the limits of detection (LODs) of 3 different screening procedures based on either Low-Resolution and High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (LR-MS and HR-MS) for the determination of pesticides in serum (among which carbamates, dithiocarbamates, neonicotinoids, organochlorines, organophosphates and pyrethroids) were explored. For HR-MS, a quadrupole time-of-flight was used in positive and negative electrospray ionization modes and data were obtained from either a targeted scheduled MSMS acquisition (HR-MSMS) or a data-independent acquisition (HR-DIA). For LR-MS, a triple quadrupole was used and data were acquired with a classical multiple-reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. Depending on the approach, the LOD values varied from 0.05 to 10 ng/mL. For the lowest concentrations, the proportion of molecules detected was systematically greater for the LR-MS approach, while those of HR-MSMS were better than those of HR-DIA. These differences in the LOD values were confirmed in a sample of 174 serums in which LR-MRM detected 89 compounds while HR-MSMS and HR-DIA detected 79 and 75 compounds, respectively. Nevertheless, for environmental and occupational purposes, HRMS approach could probably be efficient to detect most of pesticides and their metabolites in human serum and could be suitable for human biomonitoring studies or fundamental research exploring the impact of exposure to pesticides on human health.

高分辨率和低分辨率质谱法在人类环境农药暴露生物监测中的关键评估
尽管有关杀虫剂对人类健康的潜在副作用的讨论越来越多,但有关杀虫剂的风险和影响的数据仍然很少。此外,还需要能够测量大多数农药和/或其代谢物的分析工具,因为人们可能会接触到这些农药和/或其代谢物。本研究探讨了基于低分辨质谱法和高分辨质谱法(LR-MS 和 HR-MS)的三种不同筛选程序的检测限(LODs),以测定血清中的农药(其中包括氨基甲酸酯类、二硫代氨基甲酸酯类、新烟碱类、有机氯类、有机磷类和拟除虫菊酯类)。在 HR-MS 中,使用了正负电喷雾电离模式的四极杆飞行时间,并通过有针对性的计划 MSMS 采集(HR-MSMS)或独立于数据的采集(HR-DIA)获得数据。对于 LR-MS,使用的是三重四极杆,通过经典的多反应监测(MRM)模式获取数据。根据方法的不同,LOD 值从 0.05 到 10 纳克/毫升不等。就最低浓度而言,LR-MS 方法检测到的分子比例更大,而 HR-MSMS 方法的检测到的分子比例则优于 HR-DIA 方法。在 174 份血清样本中,LR-MRM 检测出 89 种化合物,而 HR-MSMS 和 HR-DIA 分别检测出 79 和 75 种化合物,这证实了 LOD 值的差异。尽管如此,就环境和职业目的而言,HRMS 方法可能可以有效地检测出人体血清中的大部分农药及其代谢物,并适用于人体生物监测研究或探索接触农药对人体健康影响的基础研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Environmental Technology & Innovation Environmental Science-General Environmental Science
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
435
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Technology & Innovation adopts a challenge-oriented approach to solutions by integrating natural sciences to promote a sustainable future. The journal aims to foster the creation and development of innovative products, technologies, and ideas that enhance the environment, with impacts across soil, air, water, and food in rural and urban areas. As a platform for disseminating scientific evidence for environmental protection and sustainable development, the journal emphasizes fundamental science, methodologies, tools, techniques, and policy considerations. It emphasizes the importance of science and technology in environmental benefits, including smarter, cleaner technologies for environmental protection, more efficient resource processing methods, and the evidence supporting their effectiveness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信