Age and gender differences in the value development of Dutch adults in 11 years of longitudinal data

IF 2.6 2区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

Journal of Research in Personality Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104540

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Value development over the life-span is rarely studied due to theory and data limitations. We use the LISS data, a Dutch longitudinal dataset, to study value change in adults aged 25–70 over 11 years from 2008 to 2019 (N=10,860), using the neo- socioanalyitcal model (NSM) as a theoretical framework. We find few cohort differences, differences between age groups and non-linear value change within individuals that continues until late adulthood. Gender differences in mean-levels are stable except in universalism and self-direction, while gender differences in rates of change are observed. We conclude that the NSM provides a fruitful framework to interpret value change as a maturation process toward becoming functioning members of society along gendered and age-graded normative stages.

查看原文本刊更多论文

11 年纵向数据中荷兰成年人价值观发展的年龄和性别差异

由于理论和数据的限制，很少有人研究人一生中的价值发展。我们使用荷兰纵向数据集 LISS 数据，以新社会分析模型（NSM）为理论框架，研究了 2008 年至 2019 年 11 年间 25-70 岁成年人的价值变化（N=10,860）。我们发现队列差异、年龄组之间的差异和个体内部的非线性价值变化很小，这种变化一直持续到成年晚期。除普遍主义和自我导向外，平均水平上的性别差异是稳定的，而变化率上的性别差异是可以观察到的。我们的结论是，NSM 提供了一个富有成果的框架，可以将价值观的变化解释为一个成熟的过程，即按照性别和年龄分级的规范阶段，成为社会中起作用的一员。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Research in Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-

CiteScore

5.40

自引率

6.10%

发文量

102

审稿时长

67 days

期刊介绍： Emphasizing experimental and descriptive research, the Journal of Research in Personality presents articles that examine important issues in the field of personality and in related fields basic to the understanding of personality. The subject matter includes treatments of genetic, physiological, motivational, learning, perceptual, cognitive, and social processes of both normal and abnormal kinds in human and animal subjects. Features: • Papers that present integrated sets of studies that address significant theoretical issues relating to personality. • Theoretical papers and critical reviews of current experimental and methodological interest. • Single, well-designed studies of an innovative nature. • Brief reports, including replication or null result studies of previously reported findings, or a well-designed studies addressing questions of limited scope.