Purchasing choices of older drivers on advanced vehicle technologies: A discrete choice experiment

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
Helen Nguyen , Kristy Coxon , Julie Brown , Gian Luca di Tanna , Blake Angell , Lisa Keay
{"title":"Purchasing choices of older drivers on advanced vehicle technologies: A discrete choice experiment","authors":"Helen Nguyen ,&nbsp;Kristy Coxon ,&nbsp;Julie Brown ,&nbsp;Gian Luca di Tanna ,&nbsp;Blake Angell ,&nbsp;Lisa Keay","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Introduction:</em> Advanced vehicle technologies (AVTs) can reduce the risk of crashing and serious injuries however their uptake remains low amongst older drivers. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to investigate what vehicle features, including AVTs, are preferred in vehicle purchasing decision in older drivers. <em>Methods:</em> Older drivers (≥65 years) completed a DCE containing 12 choice sets, with 2 vehicles to choose from, described by 4 attributes: Access, Fuel Efficiency, Cost, and AVTs. Conditional logistic models adjusting for age and sex, and then expanded to include a <em>priori</em> interactive terms for socio economic status, self-rated mobility limitations and anxiety/depression, and sex were run in R v4.2.2 with odds ratio (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (Cls) reported. Marginal willingness to pay for more AVTs was estimated. <em>Results:</em> 133 participants (mean age: 73.6 years; 66% males) completed the survey. Participants significantly preferred vehicles with better “Fuel efficiency” (OR 1.57, 95%Cl 1.44–1.71) and AVT inclusions (OR 1.29, 95%Cl 1.20–1.40), and were less likely to choose more expensive vehicles (per $5000 increase; OR 0.91, 95%Cl 0.86–0.99). “Access” did not influence choice between the two vehicle options. Those on a pension were price sensitive: twice as likely to choose a vehicle with better “fuel efficiency” and approximately 40 % less likely to choose a more expensive vehicle. Participants were willing to pay at most $1,604.17 (95%Cl $337.60-$3,174.50) extra for a car with AVTs that otherwise would cost $30,000. <em>Conclusion:</em> Despite showing interest in AVTs, older adults place more importance on price and fuel efficiency, and therefore would only pay a modest amount to get a car with more technological features. <em>Practical applications:</em> These results can help road safety professionals, industry and policy makers better communicate the value of AVTs to older drivers and help promote the uptake of AVTs and safety amongst older drivers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"91 ","pages":"Pages 210-216"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437524001221/pdfft?md5=b9a960f5232420fdc409c784828b5981&pid=1-s2.0-S0022437524001221-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Safety Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437524001221","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Advanced vehicle technologies (AVTs) can reduce the risk of crashing and serious injuries however their uptake remains low amongst older drivers. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to investigate what vehicle features, including AVTs, are preferred in vehicle purchasing decision in older drivers. Methods: Older drivers (≥65 years) completed a DCE containing 12 choice sets, with 2 vehicles to choose from, described by 4 attributes: Access, Fuel Efficiency, Cost, and AVTs. Conditional logistic models adjusting for age and sex, and then expanded to include a priori interactive terms for socio economic status, self-rated mobility limitations and anxiety/depression, and sex were run in R v4.2.2 with odds ratio (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (Cls) reported. Marginal willingness to pay for more AVTs was estimated. Results: 133 participants (mean age: 73.6 years; 66% males) completed the survey. Participants significantly preferred vehicles with better “Fuel efficiency” (OR 1.57, 95%Cl 1.44–1.71) and AVT inclusions (OR 1.29, 95%Cl 1.20–1.40), and were less likely to choose more expensive vehicles (per $5000 increase; OR 0.91, 95%Cl 0.86–0.99). “Access” did not influence choice between the two vehicle options. Those on a pension were price sensitive: twice as likely to choose a vehicle with better “fuel efficiency” and approximately 40 % less likely to choose a more expensive vehicle. Participants were willing to pay at most $1,604.17 (95%Cl $337.60-$3,174.50) extra for a car with AVTs that otherwise would cost $30,000. Conclusion: Despite showing interest in AVTs, older adults place more importance on price and fuel efficiency, and therefore would only pay a modest amount to get a car with more technological features. Practical applications: These results can help road safety professionals, industry and policy makers better communicate the value of AVTs to older drivers and help promote the uptake of AVTs and safety amongst older drivers.

老司机对先进汽车技术的购买选择:离散选择实验
导言:先进汽车技术(AVT)可以降低撞车和严重受伤的风险,但在老年驾驶者中的使用率仍然很低。本研究采用离散选择实验(DCE)来调查老年驾驶者在做出购车决定时更倾向于选择哪些汽车功能,包括先进汽车技术。实验方法老年驾驶者(≥65 岁)完成了一项包含 12 个选择集的离散选择实验,共有 2 种车辆可供选择,分别由 4 个属性描述:交通、燃油效率、成本和 AVTs。在 R v4.2.2 中运行了条件逻辑模型,对年龄和性别进行了调整,然后将社会经济状况、自我评定的行动受限和焦虑/抑郁以及性别等先验交互项进行了扩展,并报告了几率比(OR)和 95% 置信区间(Cls)。对支付更多 AVT 的边际意愿进行了估算。结果:133 名参与者(平均年龄:73.6 岁;66% 为男性)完成了调查。参与者明显偏好 "燃油效率 "更高的车辆(OR 1.57,95%Cl 1.44-1.71)和包含 AVT 的车辆(OR 1.29,95%Cl 1.20-1.40),并且不太可能选择更昂贵的车辆(每增加 5000 美元;OR 0.91,95%Cl 0.86-0.99)。"交通 "并不影响对两种汽车的选择。领取养老金的人对价格比较敏感:选择 "燃油效率 "更高的车辆的几率是选择 "燃油效率 "更高的车辆的几率的两倍,而选择价格更高的车辆的几率则降低了约 40%。参加者最多愿意多支付 1,604.17 美元(95%Cl 为 337.60 美元-3,174.50 美元)来购买一辆带有 AVT 的汽车,而如果没有 AVT 则需要 30,000 美元。结论:尽管老年人对反车辆地雷装置很感兴趣,但他们更看重价格和燃油效率,因此只愿意支付少量的钱来购买具有更多技术功能的汽车。实际应用:这些结果可以帮助道路安全专业人员、行业和政策制定者更好地向老年驾驶者宣传反车辆地雷技术的价值,并有助于促进老年驾驶者对反车辆地雷技术的使用和安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
174
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Safety Research is an interdisciplinary publication that provides for the exchange of ideas and scientific evidence capturing studies through research in all areas of safety and health, including traffic, workplace, home, and community. This forum invites research using rigorous methodologies, encourages translational research, and engages the global scientific community through various partnerships (e.g., this outreach includes highlighting some of the latest findings from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信