Ecosystem services linked sustainability assessment of poverty alleviation based on emergy analysis: Case study in the Tibetan area of Northwest Sichuan Plateau, China

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
{"title":"Ecosystem services linked sustainability assessment of poverty alleviation based on emergy analysis: Case study in the Tibetan area of Northwest Sichuan Plateau, China","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although China has successfully addressed absolute poverty, poor areas still face the challenge of reducing relative poverty while achieving sustainable ecological and economic development. A comprehensive sustainability assessment of poverty alleviation from multiple perspectives is crucial. However, existing studies have paid little attention to specific poverty alleviation measures and their ecological impacts, and lack a uniform unit of measurement. In this study, a comprehensive system for sustainability assessment of poverty alleviation is established via quantitative emergy analysis methods. Emergy accounting was conducted for two business development-based poverty alleviation programs in the Tibetan area of the Northwest Sichuan Plateau, China, from three perspectives: production processes, multidimensional poverty reduction, and ecosystem services. Emergy indices were calculated to evaluate sustainability. The results indicate that the emergy of ecosystem services and poverty reduction has significantly increased in both programs, demonstrating their substantial impact on poverty alleviation and ecological enhancement. According to the emergy indices, the emergy sustainability index increased by 0.48 and 2.04, respectively, and the ecological poverty reduction index reached 8.83 and 4.64, respectively, indicating that both programs have become more sustainable. This study highlights the comprehensive benefits of poverty alleviation in Tibetan areas and provides insights into sustainability assessments that incorporate ecosystem services.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24010859/pdfft?md5=3bc10df6879da9d57c6fcf2eb3ccd6a6&pid=1-s2.0-S1470160X24010859-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X24010859","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although China has successfully addressed absolute poverty, poor areas still face the challenge of reducing relative poverty while achieving sustainable ecological and economic development. A comprehensive sustainability assessment of poverty alleviation from multiple perspectives is crucial. However, existing studies have paid little attention to specific poverty alleviation measures and their ecological impacts, and lack a uniform unit of measurement. In this study, a comprehensive system for sustainability assessment of poverty alleviation is established via quantitative emergy analysis methods. Emergy accounting was conducted for two business development-based poverty alleviation programs in the Tibetan area of the Northwest Sichuan Plateau, China, from three perspectives: production processes, multidimensional poverty reduction, and ecosystem services. Emergy indices were calculated to evaluate sustainability. The results indicate that the emergy of ecosystem services and poverty reduction has significantly increased in both programs, demonstrating their substantial impact on poverty alleviation and ecological enhancement. According to the emergy indices, the emergy sustainability index increased by 0.48 and 2.04, respectively, and the ecological poverty reduction index reached 8.83 and 4.64, respectively, indicating that both programs have become more sustainable. This study highlights the comprehensive benefits of poverty alleviation in Tibetan areas and provides insights into sustainability assessments that incorporate ecosystem services.

Abstract Image

基于应急分析的生态系统服务扶贫可持续性评估:中国川西北高原藏区案例研究
尽管中国已成功解决了绝对贫困问题,但贫困地区仍面临着在实现生态和经济可持续发展的同时减少相对贫困的挑战。从多个角度对扶贫工作进行全面的可持续性评估至关重要。然而,现有研究很少关注具体的扶贫措施及其对生态的影响,也缺乏统一的衡量单位。本研究通过定量应急分析方法,建立了一套全面的扶贫可持续性评估体系。从生产过程、多维减贫和生态系统服务三个角度,对中国川西北高原藏区的两个以商业发展为基础的扶贫项目进行了应急核算。通过计算应急指数来评估可持续性。结果表明,在这两个项目中,生态系统服务和减贫的应急能力都有显著提高,表明其对减贫和生态改善产生了实质性影响。根据应急指数,应急可持续性指数分别增加了 0.48 和 2.04,生态减贫指数分别达到了 8.83 和 4.64,表明这两项计划都更具可持续性。本研究强调了藏区扶贫的综合效益,并为纳入生态系统服务的可持续性评估提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信