6-year follow-up on migration outcomes: a randomised clinical trial of cemented vitamin E-stabilised highly crosslinked versus standard polyethylene cup in total hip arthroplasty

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Olof Sköldenberg, Sebastian Mukka, Martin Magneli
{"title":"6-year follow-up on migration outcomes: a randomised clinical trial of cemented vitamin E-stabilised highly crosslinked versus standard polyethylene cup in total hip arthroplasty","authors":"Olof Sköldenberg, Sebastian Mukka, Martin Magneli","doi":"10.1177/11207000241267971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:In a previous study we have shown that a cemented vitamin E-doped highly cross-linked polyethylene (VEPE) compared to a conventional polyethylene cup in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has a slightly higher proximal migration but significantly lower wear rates up to 2 years after surgery. In this follow-up study we investigated the same cohort at 6 years.Methods:This was a double-blinded, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial on patients with osteoarthritis, with a mean age of 66 years. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either the conventional polyethylene cup or the VEPE cup in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was proximal implant migration of the cup measured with radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Secondary endpoints included wear rate of the cup and patient-reported outcome measurements (PROM).Results:At the 6-year follow-up, 25 patients (11 controls, 14 VEPE) were available for RSA measurements, and we found no statistically significant difference in proximal migration between the VEPE and control groups. The wear rate was significantly lower in the VEPE group compared to controls, 0.03 mm/year and 0.07 mm/year, respectively with a mean difference 0.04 mm, (95% CI, 0.02–0.06 mm). There were no cup revisions and no difference in PROM between the groups.Conclusions:Based on our 6-year results, the VEPE group exhibited no statistical or clinically relevant difference compared to the control group, and the wear rate was significantly lower in the VEPE group. The use of a cemented vitamin E-doped highly cross-linked cup is a good option in total hip arthroplasty.","PeriodicalId":12911,"journal":{"name":"HIP International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIP International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11207000241267971","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:In a previous study we have shown that a cemented vitamin E-doped highly cross-linked polyethylene (VEPE) compared to a conventional polyethylene cup in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has a slightly higher proximal migration but significantly lower wear rates up to 2 years after surgery. In this follow-up study we investigated the same cohort at 6 years.Methods:This was a double-blinded, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial on patients with osteoarthritis, with a mean age of 66 years. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either the conventional polyethylene cup or the VEPE cup in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was proximal implant migration of the cup measured with radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Secondary endpoints included wear rate of the cup and patient-reported outcome measurements (PROM).Results:At the 6-year follow-up, 25 patients (11 controls, 14 VEPE) were available for RSA measurements, and we found no statistically significant difference in proximal migration between the VEPE and control groups. The wear rate was significantly lower in the VEPE group compared to controls, 0.03 mm/year and 0.07 mm/year, respectively with a mean difference 0.04 mm, (95% CI, 0.02–0.06 mm). There were no cup revisions and no difference in PROM between the groups.Conclusions:Based on our 6-year results, the VEPE group exhibited no statistical or clinically relevant difference compared to the control group, and the wear rate was significantly lower in the VEPE group. The use of a cemented vitamin E-doped highly cross-linked cup is a good option in total hip arthroplasty.
对移位结果的 6 年随访:全髋关节置换术中粘接维生素 E 稳定型高交联聚乙烯髋臼杯与标准聚乙烯髋臼杯的随机临床试验
背景:在之前的一项研究中,我们发现在全髋关节置换术(THA)中,与传统的聚乙烯髋臼杯相比,掺杂维生素E的骨水泥高交联聚乙烯(VEPE)的近端移位率稍高,但术后2年的磨损率明显降低。方法:这是一项双盲、非劣效、随机对照试验,对象是平均年龄为66岁的骨关节炎患者。患者按1:1的比例随机分配接受传统聚乙烯髋臼杯或VEPE髋臼杯。主要终点是通过放射性立体计量分析(RSA)测量的髋臼杯近端植入迁移。结果:在6年的随访中,有25名患者(11名对照组,14名VEPE组)接受了RSA测量,我们发现VEPE组和对照组在近端移位方面没有显著的统计学差异。与对照组相比,VEPE 组的磨损率明显较低,分别为 0.03 毫米/年和 0.07 毫米/年,平均差异为 0.04 毫米(95% CI,0.02-0.06 毫米)。结论:根据我们的6年结果,VEPE组与对照组相比没有统计学或临床相关性差异,而VEPE组的磨损率明显较低。在全髋关节置换术中,使用掺杂维生素E的高交联骨水泥髋臼杯是一个不错的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HIP International
HIP International 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: HIP International is the official journal of the European Hip Society. It is the only international, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal dedicated to diseases of the hip. HIP International considers contributions relating to hip surgery, traumatology of the hip, prosthetic surgery, biomechanics, and basic sciences relating to the hip. HIP International invites reviews from leading specialists with the aim of informing its readers of current evidence-based best practice. The journal also publishes supplements containing proceedings of symposia, special meetings or articles of special educational merit. HIP International is divided into six independent sections led by editors of the highest scientific merit. These sections are: • Biomaterials • Biomechanics • Conservative Hip Surgery • Paediatrics • Primary and Revision Hip Arthroplasty • Traumatology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信